Financial interests and research bias

Perspectives on Science

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 255-285

  Resnik, David B ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142256741     PISSN: 10636145     EISSN: 15309274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/106361400750340497     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Abbott, A. 1999. "Science Comes to Terms with the Lessons of Fraud." Nature 398:13-17.
2. Agnew, B. 1999. "NIH Invites Activists into the Inner Sanctum." Science 283:1999-2001.
3. Altman, L. 1996. "Secrecy is Hurting Medical Research, a US Official Says." New York Times, 10 February, sec. A, p. 11.
4. Angell, M. 2000. "The Pharmaceutical Industry-To Whom Is It Accountable?" New EnglandJournal of Medicine 342: 1902-4.
5. American Physical Society (APS). 1991. Guidelines for Professional Conduct. Washington: APS.
6. American Statistical Association (ASA). 1999. Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice. Alexandria, VA: ASA.
7. Associated Press. 2000. "Report: Diet Drug Firm Accused of Funding Favorable Journal Articles." The Daily Reflector, 24 May, sec. A, p. 3.
8. Associated Press. 1993. "Drug Maker Lilly Accused of Cloaking Toxic Reaction." The Denver Post. 10 December, sec. A, p. 22.
9. Beardsley, T. 1994. "Big-Time Biology." Scientific American 271, 5: 90-94.
10. nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Blumenthal, D. 1997. "Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty." Journal of the American Medical Association 277: 1224-28.
12. Bowie, N. 1994. "An Evaluation of University-Business Partnerships." In: Bowie, N. ed. University-Business Partnerships: an Assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 45-99.
13. Broad, W. and Wade, N. 1993. Betrayers of Truth, new ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
14. Brody, B. 1995. Ethical Issues in Drug Testing, Approval and Pricing. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Collins, H. 1985. Changing Order. London: Sage Publications.
16. Crossen, C. 1994. Tainted Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.
17. Davidson, R. 1986. "Source of Funding and Outcome of Clinical Trials" Journal of General Internal Medicine 1: 155-58.
18. DeMets, D. 1999. "Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research." Science and Engineering Ethics 5: 97-118.
19. Department of Health and Human Services. 1994. Objectivity in Research. Federal Register 59, 123:33242-33251.
20. nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Dresser, R. 1992. "Wanted: Single, White Male for Research." Hastings Center Report 22,1: 24-29.
22. Dresser, R. 1999. "Public Advocacy and Allocation of Federal Funds for Biomedical Research." Milbank Quarterly 77, 2: 257-82.
23. Easterbrook, P., et al. 1991. "Publication Bias in Clinical Research." Lancet 337:867-72.
24. Enserink, M. 1996. "Clinical Trials: Fraud and Ethics Charges Hit Stroke Drug Trial." Science 274:2004-5.
25. FDA. 1998. Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators. 21 Code of Federal Regulations 54.
26. Foltz, F. 1999. "Five Arguments for Increasing Public Participation in Making Science Policy." Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society 19,2: 117-27.
27. Frankel, M. 1999. "Public access to data." Science 283: 1114.
28. Friedberg, M., et al. 1999. "Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in New Drugs Used in Oncology." Journal of the American Medical Association 282:1453-7.
29. Fuchs, S. 1992. The Professional Quest for the Truth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30. Fuller, S. 1988. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31. Gibbs, W. 1996. "The Price of Silence: Does Profit-minded Secrecy Retard Scientific Progress?" Scientific American 275, 5: 15-16.
32. rd ed. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Glick, J. and Shamoo, A. 1993. "A Call for the Development of Good Research Practices (GPR) Guidelines." Accountability in Research 2: 231-35.
34. Gould, S. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: WW Norton.
35. Gross, P. and Levitt, N. 1994. Higher Superstition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Grunbaum, A. 1985. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Haerlin, B. and Parr, D. 1999. "How to Restore Public Trust in Science." Nature 400: 499.
38. Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
39. Hess, D. 1999. "Suppression, Bias, and Selection in Science: the Case of Cancer Research." Accountability in Research 6, 4: 245-257.
40. Hilts, P. 1994a. "Philip Morris Blocked '83 Paper Showing Tobacco is Addictive, Panel Finds." New York Times, 1 April, sec A, p. 1.
41. Hilts, P. 1994b. "Two Scientists Testify Against Tobacco Firm." New York Times, 29 April, sec. A, p. 1.
42. Hilts, P. 1997. "Researcher Profited After Study by Investing in Cold Treatment." New York Times, 1 February, sec. A, p. 6.
43. Howson, C. and Urbach, P. 1989. Scientific Reasoning. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
44. Hull, D. 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Huizenga, J. 1992. Cold Fusion. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
46. Jaffe, A. 1996. "Trends and Patterns of Research and Development Expenditures in the United States." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93:12658-12663.
47. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Jasanoff, S. 1995. Science at the Bar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Joravsky, D. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Kennedy, D. 2000. "Science and Secrecy." Science 289:722.
52. Kitcher, P. 1992. "The Naturalists Return." The Philosophical Review 101, 1: 53-110.
53. Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Kitcher, P. 1996. The Lives to Come. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55. Kosso, P. 1992. Reading the Book of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Krimsky S, et al. 1996. "Financial Interests of Authors in Scientific Journals: a Pilot Study of 14 Publications." Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 395-410.
57. Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Kuhn, T. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. LaFollette M. 1992. Stealing into Print. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. Lakatos, I. 1978. Philosophical Papers, J. Worrall and G. Curie, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
62. Laudan, L. 1984. Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63. Laudan, L. 1990. Science and Relativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Longino H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Macknin, M. et al. 1998. "Zinc Gluconate Lozenges for Treating the Common Cold in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Journal of the American Medical Association 279: 1662-67.
66. McCrary, V. et al. 2000. "A National Survey of Policies of Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research." New England Journal of Medicine 343:1621-26.
67. Meadows, J. 1992. The Great Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Merton, R. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Misakian, A. and Bero, L. 1998. "Publication Bias and Research on Passive Smoking: Comparison of Published and Unpublished Studies." Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 250-53.
70. Munthe, C. and Welin, S. 1996. "The Morality of Scientific Openness." Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 411-28.
71. National Academy of Science. 1994. On Being a Scientist. Washington: National Academy Press.
72. Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling Science, revised ed. New York: W.H. Freeman.
73. Newton-Smith, W. 1981. The Rationality of Science. New York: Routledge.
74. Office of Research Integrity. 1999. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Federal Register 64, 198: 55722-55725.
75. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. 1992. Responsible Science. Washington: National Academy Press.
76. Peirce, C. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
77. Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
78. Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
79. Raloff, J. 1994. "The Great Nicotine Debate: Are Cigarette Recipes Cooked to Keep Smokers Hooked?" Science News 145, 20: 314-317.
80. Resnik, D. 1998a. The Ethics of Science: an Introduction. New York and London: Routledge.
81. Resnik D. 1998b. "Conflicts of Interest in Science." Perspectives on Science 6, 4:381-408.
82. Resnik D. 1998c. "Industry-Sponsored Research: Secrecy Versus Corporate Responsibility." Business and Society Review 99,1: 31-35.
83. Resnik D. 1999. "Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Regulation: Lessons from Stem Cell Research." Health Care Analysis 7: 273-87.
84. Resnik, D. 2000. "Statistics, Ethics, and Research: an Agenda for Education and Reform." Accountability in Research 8: 163-188.
85. Shamoo, A., ed. 1989. Principles of Research Data Audit. New York: Gordon and Breach: 111-120.
86. Shrader-Frechette, K. 1994. The Ethics of Scientific Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
87. Sokal, A. 1996. "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity." Social Text 46/47: 217-52.
88. Solomon, M. 1994. "A More Social Epistemology." In F. Schmitt, ed. Socializing Epistemology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.218-233.
89. Swazey, J., et al 1993. "Ethical Problems in Academic Research." American Scientist 81: 542-53.
90. Tauer, C. 1999. "Testing Drugs in Pediatric Populations: the FDA Mandate." Accountability in Research 7: 37-58.
91. Thompson, D. and Gutman, A. 1996. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92. Wade, N. 1994. "The Erosion of the Academic Ethos: the Case of Biology." In Bowie, N. University-Business Partnerships: an Assessment. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 143-158.
93. Wadman, M. 1996. "Drug Company Suppressed Publication of Research." Nature 381: 4.
94. Weiner, T. 1994. "Inquiry Finds 'Star Wars' Plan Tried to Exaggerate Test Results." New York Times, 22 July, sec. A, p. 1.
95. Whitbeck, C. 1998. Ethics in Engineering Practice and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Ziman, J. 1968. Public Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97. Ziman, J. 1996. "Is Science Losing Its Objectivity?" Nature 382: 751-754.
98. Zolla-Parker, S. 1994. "The Professor, the University, and Industry." Scientific American 270, 3:120.