Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: An AI model

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 150, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 145-181

  McLaren, Bruce M ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

A* search; Analogy; Engineering ethics; Ethical principles; Extensional definitions; Interpretive case based reasoning; Operationalization; Structural mapping

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

LEGAL REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0142248385     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00135-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. V.A. Aleven, Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1997.
2. Allen J.F. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Comm. ACM. 26:(11):1983;832-843.
3. Arras J.D. Principles and particularity: The role of cases in bioethics. Indiana Law J. 983:(69):1994;1006.
4. Ashley K.D., Aleven V.A. Reasoning symbolically about partially matched cases. Proc. IJCAI-97, Nagoya, Japan. 1997;335-341.
5. Ashley K.D., McLaren B.M. Reasoning with reasons in case-based comparisons. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Sesimbra, Portugal. 1995.
6. Ashley K.D. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Berman D.H., Hafner C.D. Obstacles to the development of logic-based models of legal reasoning. Walter C. Computer Power and Legal Language. 1986;185-214 Greenwood Press.
8. Bonissone P., Ayub S. Representing cases and rules in plausible reasoning systems. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Tools with AI, Arlington, VA. 1992.
9. Branting L.K. Reasoning with Rules and Precedents. 2000;Kluwer, Dordrecht.
10. Branting L.K. Building explanations from rules and structured cases. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. 34:(6):1991;797-837.
11. Brüninghaus S., Ashley K.D. The role of information extraction for textual CBR. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Vancouver, BC. 2001;74-89.
12. Brüninghaus S., Ashley K.D. Bootstrapping case base development with annotated case summaries. Althoff K.-D. CBR Research and Development (ICCBR-99). Lecture Notes in AI. 1650:1999;59-73 Springer, Berlin.
13. Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. 1997;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
14. Forbus K.D., Gentner D., Law K. MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Sci. 19:1994;141-205.
15. Gardner A. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning. 1987;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Gentner D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7:1983;155-170.
17. Ginsberg M. Essentials of Artificial Intelligence. 1993;Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
18. Goldin I.M., Ashley K.D., Pinkus R.L. Introducing PETE: Computer support for teaching ethics. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-2001), St. Louis, MO. 2001;94-98.
19. Harris C.E., Pritchard M.S., Rabins M.J. Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. 2nd Edition: 1999;Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
20. Horty J. Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritance. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-99), Oslo. 1999;63-72.
21. Jonsen A.R., Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. 1988;California Univ. Press, Berkeley, CA.
22. Kettler B.P., Hendler J.A., Andersen W.A., Evett M.P. Massively parallel support for case-based planning. IEEE Expert. 1994;8-14.
23. Kolodner J. Case-Based Reasoning. 1993;Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
24. J.A. Koomen, The TIMELOGIC temporal reasoning system, Technical Report 231, Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, NY, 1989.
25. Leake D.B. An indexing vocabulary for case-based explanation. Proceedings of AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA. 1991;10-15.
26. Lewis D.D., Schapire R.E., Callan J.P., Papka R. Training algorithms for linear text classifiers. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Zurich. 1996.
27. McLaren B.M., Ashley K.D. Helping a CBR program know what it knows. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Vancouver, BC. 2001;377-391.
28. McLaren B.M., Ashley K.D. Assessing relevance with extensionally defined principles and cases. Proc. AAAI-2000, Austin, TX. 2000;316-322.
29. B.M. McLaren, Assessing the relevance of cases and principles using operationalization techniques, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1999.
30. McLaren B.M., Ashley K.D. Case representation, acquisition, and retrieval in SIROCCO. Althoff K.-D., et al. CBR Research and Development (ICCBR-99). Lecture Notes in AI. 1650:1999;248-262 Springer, Berlin.
31. McLaren B.M., Ashley K.D. Case-based comparative evaluation in TRUTH-TELLER. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pittsburgh, PA. 1995.
32. Mostow J. Machine transformation of advice into a heuristic search procedure. Michalski R.S., Carbonell J.G., Mitchell T.M. Machine Learning, Vol. 1. 1983;367-403 Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
33. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), Opinions of the Board of Ethical Review, Vols. I-VIII, National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, VA, 1958-1998.
34. The NSPE Ethics Reference Guide. 1996;National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, VA.
35. R. Pinkus, K. Ashley, M. Chi, J. Moore, Modeling learning to reason with cases in engineering ethics: A test domain for intelligent assistance, NSF Proposal No. 9720341, Project Statement, 1997.
36. Resnick R., Halliday D. Physics. 1967;Wiley, New York.
37. Rissland E.L., Skalak D.B., Friedman M.T. Evaluating a legal argument program: The BankXX experiments. Artificial Intelligence and Law 5. 1997;1-74.
38. Rissland E.L., Skalak D.B., Friedman M.T. BankXX: Supporting legal arguments through heuristic retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 4:1996;1-71.
39. Rissland E.L., Skalak D.B. CABARET: Statutory interpretation in a hybrid architecture. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. 34:(6):1991;839-887.
40. E.L. Rissland, The structure of mathematical knowledge, AI Technical Report No. 472, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1978.
41. P. Thagard, K.J. Holyoak, G. Nelson, D. Gochfeld, Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction, Technical Report CSL-Report 41, Princeton Univ. Press, 1990.
42. Toulmin S.E. The Uses of Argument. 1958;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Twining W., Miers D. How to Do Things With Rules. 1976;Cox and Wyman, London.
44. van Rijsbergen C.J. Information Retrieval. 2nd Edition: 1979;Butterworths, London.
45. Witten I., Moffat A., Bell T.C. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. 2nd Edition: 1999;Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.