Case representation, acquisition, and retrieval in sirocco

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1650, Issue , 1999, Pages 248-262

  McLaren, Bruce ^a   Ashley, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ANALYSIS SYSTEM; CASE ACQUISITION; CASE DESCRIPTION; CASE REPRESENTATION; ENGINEERING ETHICS; INTELLIGENT RETRIEVAL; RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS; SMALL VARIATIONS;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 22644450679     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48508-2_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aleven, V. (1997). Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
2. Ashley, K. D. and McLaren, B. M. (1995). Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. In the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-95). Pp, 133-144. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1010. Springer Verlag. Heidelberg, Germany.
3. Branting, L. K. (1990) Integrating Rules and Precedents for Classification and Explanation: Automating Legal Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation. U. Texas at Austin AI Lab. AI 90-146.
4. Branting, L. K. (1994). A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2: 1-31. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
5. Bruninghaus, S., and Ashley, K. D. (1997) Using Machine Learning to Assign Indices to Legal Cases. In the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-97). Pp. 303-314. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1266. Springer Verlag. Heidelberg, Germany.
6. Cheng, C. H., Holsapple, C. W. and Lee, A. (1996). Citation-Based Journal Rankings for AI Research: A Business Perspective. AI Magazine, Vol. 17, No. 2.
7. Daniels, J. and E. Rissland. (1997) Finding Legally Relevant Passages in Case Opinions. In the Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL-97). Pp. 39-46. ACM Press: New York.
8. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D. and Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-based Retrieval. Cognitive Science 19, Pp. 141-205.
9. Jonsen A. R. and Toulmin S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of CA Press, Berkeley.
10. Lewis, D. D., Schapire, R. E., Callan, J. P., and Papka, R. (1996). Training Algorithms for Linear Text Classifiers. In the Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Zurich.
11. McLaren, B. M. and Ashley, K. D. (1998). Exploring the Dialectic Between Abstract Rules and Concrete Facts: Operationalizing Principles and Cases in Engineering Ethics. In the Proceedings From the Fourth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Pp, 37-51. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1488. Springer Verlag. Heidelberg, Germany.
12. Mostow, J. (1983). Machine transformation of advice into a heuristic search procedure. In Machine Learning, vol. 1.
13. NSPE (1958-1997). Opinions of the Board of Ethical Review, Vol. I - VII and NSPE Ethics Reference Guide. Published by National Society of Professional Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia.
14. Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B., and Friedman, M. T. (1996). BankXX: Supporting Legal Arguments through Heuristic Retrieval. AI and Law 4: 1-71. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
15. Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G., and Gochfeld, (1990). Analog Retrieval by Constraint Satisfaction, Artificial Intelligence 46, Pp. 259-310.
16. van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, second edition