Hanging Out with the Wrong Crowd: How Much Difference Can Parents Make in an Urban Environment?

Journal of Urban Health

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 383-399

  Lloyd, Jacqueline J ^a,b   Anthony, James C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Deviant peer affiliation; Parent monitoring; Urban

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONDUCT DISORDER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DELINQUENCY; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONITORING; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; URBAN AREA; AFRICAN AMERICAN; CAUCASIAN; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; ETHNOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; URBAN POPULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGGRESSION; CHILD; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; LINEAR MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTING; PEER GROUP; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 0142244523     PISSN: 10993460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jtg043     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kandel D. Adolescent marihuana use: role of parents and peers. Science. 1973;181:1067-1070.
2. Kandel DB. Family and peer processes in adolescent drug use. In: Mednick SA, Harway M, Finello KM, eds. Handbook of Longitudinal Research, Vol. 2 Teenage and Adult Cohorts. New York, NY: Praeger; 1984:18-33.
3. Kandel DB. On processes of peer influences in adolescent drug use: a developmental perspective. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1985;4:139-163.
4. Hawkins JD, Lishner DM, Catalano RF, Howard MO. Childhood predictors of adolescent substance abuse: toward an empirically grounded theory. J Child Contemp Soc. 1985;18:11-48.
5. Patterson GR, DeBaryshe BD, Ramsey E. A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Am Psychol. 1989;44:329-335.
6. Dishion TJ. Peer context of troublesome behavior in children and adolescents. In: Leone P, ed. Understanding Troubled and Troublesome Youth. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1990:128-153.
7. Dishion TJ, Capaldi D, Spracklen KM, Li F. Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Dev Psychopathol. 1995;7:803-824.
8. Dishion TJ, Patterson M, Stoolmiller M, Skinner ML. Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Dev Psychol. 1991;27:172-180.
9. Metzler CW, Noell J, Biglan A, Ary D, Smolkowski K. The social context for risky behavior among adolescents. J Behav Med. 1994;17:419-438.
10. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Biglan A, Ary D. Contributions of the social context to the development of adolescent substance use: a multivariate latent growth modeling approach. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;50:57-71.
11. Chilcoat HD, Dishion TJ, Anthony JC. Parent monitoring and the incidence of drug sampling in urban elementary school children. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:25-31.
12. Chilcoat HD, Anthony JC. Impact of parental monitoring on initiation of drug use through late childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:91-100.
13. Kellam SG, Anthony JC. Targeting early antecedents to prevent tobacco smoking: findings from an epidemiologically based randomized field trial. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1490-1495.
14. Kellam SG, Werthamer-Larsson L, Dolan LJ, et al. Developmental epidemiologically based preventive trials: baseline modeling of early target behaviors and depressive symptoms. Am J Community Psychol. 1991;19:563-584.
15. Hunter A, Pearson J, Ialongo N, Kellam S. Parenting alone to multiple caregivers: child care and parenting arrangements in black and white urban families. Fam Relat. 1998;47:343-353.
16. Ialongo N, Werthamer L, Brown HB, Kellam S, Wai SB. The proximal impact of two first grade preventive interventions on early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression, and antisocial behavior. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27:599-642.
17. Kellam SG, Branch JD, Agrawal KC, Engsminger ME. Mental Health and Going to School: The Woodlawn Program of Assessment, Early Intervention, and Evaluation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1975.
18. Kellam SG, Ensminger ME, Simon MB. Mental health in first grade and teenage drug, alcohol, and cigarette use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980;5:273-304.
19. Kellam SG, Brown CH, Fleming JP. Developmental epidemiological studies of substance use in Woodlawn: implications for prevention research strategy. NIDA Res Monogr. 1982;41:21-33.
20. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
21. Capaldi DM, Patterson GR. Psychometric Properties of 14 Latent Constructs From the Oregon Youth Study. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1989.
22. Werthamer-Larsson L, Kellam S, Wheeler L. Effect of first-grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. Am J Community Psychol. 1991;19:585-602.
23. Werthamer-Larsson LA. The Epidemiology of Maladaptive Behavior in First Grade Children [doctoral dissertation]. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University; 1988.
24. Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985.
25. Crum RM, Lillie-Blanton M, Anthony JC. Neighborhood environment and opportunity to use cocaine and other drugs in late childhood and early adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;43:155-161.
26. Kaplan HB, Martin SS, Robbins C. Pathways to adolescent drug use: self-derogation, peer influence, weakening of social controls, and early substance use. J Health Soc Behav. 1984;25:270-289.
27. Harter S. Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1985.
28. Ensminger ME, Brown CH, Kellam SG. Social control as an explanation of sex differences in substance use among adolescents. NIDA Res Monogr. 1984;49:296-304.
29. Khoury EL. Are girls different? A developmental perspective on gender differences in risk factors for substance use among adolescents. In: Vega WA, Gil AG, eds. Drug Use and Ethnicity in Early Adolescence. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1998:95-123.
30. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:1049-1060.
31. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 1999.
32. Dishion TJ, Li F, Spracklen KM, Brown G, Haas E. The measurement of parenting practices in research on adolescent problem behavior: a multimethod and multitrait analysis. NIDA Res Monogr. 1999;177:260-293.
33. Chilcoat HD, Breslau N, Anthony JC. Potential barriers to parent monitoring: social disadvantage, marital status, and maternal psychiatric disorder. J Am Acad of Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:1673-1682.
34. Neiderhiser JM, Reiss D, Hetherington EM, Plomin R. Relationships between parenting and adolescent adjustment over time: genetic and environmental contributions. Dev Psychol. 1999;35:680-692.
35. Ary DV, Duncan TE, Biglan A, Metzler CW, Noell JW, Smolkowski K. Development of adolescent problem behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999;27:141-150.
36. Storr CL, Ialongo NS, Kellam SG, Anthony JC. A randomized controlled trial of two primary school intervention strategies to prevent early onset tobacco smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;66:51-60.