Validity of the WCST-64 After Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 153-158

  Merrick, Euriel E ^a   Donders, Jacobus ^a   Wiersum, Melissa ^b  

^a MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b CALVIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS; WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST 64;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0142240113     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/clin.17.2.153.16512     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Axelrod, B.N. (2002). Are normative data from the 64-card version of the WCST comparable to the full WCST? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 7-11.
2. Bell, M.D., Greig, T.C., Kaplan, E., & Bryson, G. (1997). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test dimensions in schizophrenia: Factorial, predictive, and divergent validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 933-941.
3. Donders, J., & Axelrod, B. (2002). Two-subtest estimations of WAIS-III factor index scores. Psychological Assessment, 14, 360-364.
4. Donders, J., Tulsky, D.S., & Zhu, J. (2001). Criterion validity of new WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 892-898.
5. Goldman, G.S., Axelrod, B.N., Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Curtiss, G., Kay, G.G., & Thompson, L.L. (1996). Latent structure of the WCST with the standardization samples. Assessment, 3, 73-78.
6. Greve, K.W., Ingram, F., & Bianchini, K.J. (1998). Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in a clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 597-609.
7. Hawkins, K.A. (1998). Indicators of brain dysfunction derived from graphic representations of the WAIS-III/WMS-III technical manual samples: A preliminary approach to clinical utility. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 535-551.
8. Heaton, R.K. (1999). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer version 3 for Windows - Research Edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Heaton, R.K. (2000). WCST-64: Computer version for Windows - Research Edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10. Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Talley, J.L., Kay, G.G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Heaton, R.K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C.G. (1991). Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Jones, R.D., Anderson, S.W., Cole, T., & Hathaway-Nepple, J. (1996). Neuropsychological sequelae of traumatic brain injury. In M. Rizzo & D. Tranel (Eds.), Head injury and postconcussive syndrome (pp. 395-414). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
13. Kongs, S.K., Thompson, L.L., Iverson, G.L., & Heaton, R.K. (2000). WCST-64: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Card Version, Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Martin, T.A., Donders, J., & Thompson, E. (2000). Potential of and problems with new measures of psychometric intelligence after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 402-408.
15. Paolo, A.M., Tröster, A.I., Axelrod, B.N., & Koller, W.C. (1995). Construct validity of the WCST in normal elderly and persons with Parkinsons's disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 463-473.
16. Reitan, R.M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). South Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
17. Robinson, L.J., Kester, D.B., Saykin, A.J., Kaplan, E.F., & Gur, R.C. (1991). Comparison of two short forms of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 27-33.
18. Scherzer, B.P., Charbonneau, S., Solomon, C.R., & LeFore, F. (1993). Abstract thinking following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 7, 411-423.
19. Sherer, M., Nick, T.G., Millis, S.R., & Novack, T.A. (2003). Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 512-520.
20. Smith-Seemiller, L., Franzen, M.D., & Bowers, D. (1997). Use of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test short forms in clinical samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 421-427.
21. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81-84.
22. Vilkki, J. (1992). Cognitive flexibility and mental programming after closed head injuries and anterior or posterior cerebral excisions. Neuropsychologia, 30, 807-814.
23. Wiegner, S., & Donders, J. (1999). Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test after traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 6, 179-187.
24. Williams, D.H., Levin, H.S., & Eisenberg, H.M. (1990). Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery, 27, 422-428.
25. Williamson, D.J.G., Scott, J.G., & Adams, R.L. (1996). Traumatic brain injury. In R.L. Adams, O.A. Parsons, J.L. Culbertson, & S.J. Nixon (Eds.), Neuropsychology for clinical practice: Etiology, assessment, and treatment of common neurological disorders (pp. 9-64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.