The Who and When of "Gender-Blind" Attitudes: Predictors of Gender-Role Egalitarianism in Two Different Domains

Sex Roles

Volumn 49, Issue 9-10, 2003, Pages 527-532

  Andersen, Stacey J ^a   Johnson, Joel T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Androgyny; Egalitarianism; Gender roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142215935     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025836807911     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., & King, L. A. (1984). The Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10, 563-576.
2. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Employment Policy Foundation. (2002, August 21). News release. Retrieved September 17, 2002, from http://www.epf.org/media/newsreleases/2002/nr20020821.htm
5. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
6. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
7. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097-1108.
8. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1993). Manual for SRES: An instrument to measure attitudes toward gender-role equality. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
9. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1997). Sex-role Egalitarianism Scale: Development, psychometric properties, and recommendations for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 71-87.
10. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468-477.
11. Niemi, R. G., Mueller, J., & Smith, T. W. (1989). Trends in public opinion: A compendium of survey data. New York: Greenwood.
12. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.
13. Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28, 499-509.
14. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
15. Smith, T. W. (1999). The emerging 21st century American family. (GSS Social Change Report No. 42). Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
16. Solomon, L. Z., Minton, J., Calano, L., Raber, R., & Rapoport-Taylor, B. (1985). Being female and liking it: An empirical study. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 241-252.
17. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
18. Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17-34.
19. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 43-44.
20. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.