Audiologic evaluation and management of adults with auditory processing disorders

Seminars in Speech and Language

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 233-244

  Baran, Jane A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Central auditory processing; Learning disabilities; Obscure auditory dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE;

EID: 0030204152     PISSN: 07340478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1064101     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Baran, J.A. (1990, April). Central auditory test results in adult learning disabled subjects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Audiology, New Orleans, LA.
2. Baran, J.A., & Musiek, F.E. (1991). Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In W.F. Rintelmann (Ed.), Hearing assessment (2nd ed., pp. 549-602). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Baran, J.A., & Musiek, F.E. (1994). Evaluation of the adult with hearing complaints and normal audiograms. Audiology Today, 6(5), 9-11.
4. Baran, J.A., & Musiek, F.E. (1995). Central auditory processing disorders in children and adults. In L.G Wall (Ed.), Hearing for the speech-language pathologist and health care professional (pp. 415-440). Boston: Heinemann-Butterworth.
5. Baran, J.A., & Owens, G.A. (1986, November). Central auditory results in college age learning disabled students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit, MI.
6. Beasley, D.S., Forman, B., & Rintelmann, W.F. (1972). Perception of time-compressed CNC monosyllables by normal listeners. Journal of Auditory Research 12, 71-75.
7. Beasley, D.S., Schwimmer, S., & Rintelmann, W.F. (1972). Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 340-350.
8. Chermak, G.D., Vonhof, M.R., & Bendel, R.B. (1989). Word identification performance in the presence of competing speech and noise in learning disabled adults. Ear and Hearing, 10, 90-93.
9. Ferman, L., Verschurre, J., & van Zanten, B. (1993). Impaired speech perception in noise in patients with a normal audiogram. Audiology, 32, 49-54.
10. Katz, J. (1962). The use of staggered spondaic words for assessing the integrity of the central auditory nervous system. Journal of Auditory Research, 2, 327-337.
11. Middelweerd, M.J., Festen, J.M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. Audiology, 29, 1-7.
12. Musiek, F.E. (1983). Assessment of central auditory function: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear and Hearing, 4, 79-83.
13. Musiek, F.E., & Baran, J.A. (1996). Amplification and the central auditory nervous system. In M. Valente (Ed.), Hearing aids: Standards, options, and limitations (pp. 407-438). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
14. Musiek F.E., Baran, J.A., & Pinheiro, M.L. (1994). Neuroaudiology: Case studies. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
15. Pinheiro, M.L., & Ptacek, P.H. (1971). Reversals in the perception of noise and tonal patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1778-1782.
16. Saunders, G.H., & Haggard, M.P. (1989). The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction. Ear and Hearing, 10, 200-208.
17. Wexler, B., & Hawles, T. (1983). Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 21, 59-66.