Cooper pairing with finite angular momentum via a central attraction: From the BCS to the Bose limits

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 2145261-21452612

  Quintanilia, Jorge ^a,b   Györffy, Balazs L ^a   Annett, James F ^a   Wallington, Jonathan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENSITY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHASE TRANSITION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; ROTATION;

EID: 0142167304     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. J. Bardeen, L. Cooper, and J. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
2. R. Balian, in The Many-Body Problem, edited by E. Caianiello (Academic, New York, 1964), Vol. 2.
3. R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaskiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
4. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, non-Relativistic Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1958).
5. D. Eagles, Phys. Rev. 186, 456 (1969).
6. P. Pincus, P. Chaikin, and I.C.F. Coll, Solid State Commun. 12, 1265 (1973).
7. A. Leggett, in Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter, edited by A. Pekelski and J. Przystawa (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).
8. P. Nozirès and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).
9. J.R. Engelbrecht, A. Nazarenko, and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13 406 (1998).
10. B.C. den Hertog, Phys. Rev. B 60, 559 (1999).
11. N. Andrenacci, A. Perali, P. Pieri, and G. Strinati, Phys. Rev. B 60, 12 410 (1999).
12. J.P. Wallington and J.F. Annett, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1433 (2000).
13. Q. Chen, I. Kosztin, and K. Levin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2801 (2000).
14. M.B. Soares, F. Kokubun, J.J. Rodríguez-Núñez, and O. Rendón, Phys. Rev. B 65, 174506 (2002).
15. S. Stintzing and W. Zwerger, Phys. Rev. B 56, 9004 (1997).
16. For fermions in a continuum with a repulsive interaction V(r), the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism [W. Kohn and J.M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965)] can lead to pairing with high angular momentum [A.V. Chubukov and M.Yu. Kagan, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1, 3135 (1989)]. But note that in this case the BE limit can never be realized, since obviously there is no two-body bound state.
17. For fermions in a continuum with a repulsive interaction V(r), the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism [W. Kohn and J.M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965)] can lead to pairing with high angular momentum [A.V. Chubukov and M.Yu. Kagan, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1, 3135 (1989)]. But note that in this case the BE limit can never be realized, since obviously there is no two-body bound state.
18. K. Gottfried, Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1966), Vol. I.
19. D. Villarroel, Eur. Phys. J. B 19, 85 (1998).
20. J. Quintanilla and B. Gyorffy, Physica B 284-288, 421 (2000).
21. E. Babev and H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. B 438, 311 (1998).
22. M. Randeria, J.-M. Duan, and L.-Y. Shieh, Phys. Rev. B 41, 327 (1990).
23. M. Drechsler and W. Zwerger, Ann. Phys. (Weinheim) 1, 15 (1992).
24. C.S. de Melo, M. Randeria, and J. Engelbrecht, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3202 (1993).
25. J. Engelbrecht, M. Randeria, and C.S. de Melo, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15 153 (1997).
26. M. Marini, F. Pistolesi, and G. Strinati, Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 151 (1998).
27. R. Haussmann, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 91, 291 (1993).
28. R. Haussmann, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 975 (1994).
29. E. Babev and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12 083 (1999).
30. F. Pistolesi and G. Strinati, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6356 (1994).
31. F. Pistolesi and G. Strinati, Phys. Rev. B 53, 15 168 (1996).
32. M. Randeria, in Bose-Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. Snorke, and S. Stringari (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
33. A. Alexandrov and S. Rubin, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5141 (1993).
34. J. Quintanilla, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol, 2001.
35. J.F. Annett, N. Goldenfeld, and A. Leggett, in Physical Properties of High-Temperature Superconductors, edited by D. Ginsberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), Vol. V.
36. P. Anderson and W. Brinkman, in The Helium Liquids: Proceedings of the 15th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, 1974, edited by J. Armitage and I. Farquhar (Academic Press, New York, 1975) [reprinted in P.W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin/Cummings, New York, 1984)].
37. P. Anderson and W. Brinkman, in The Helium Liquids: Proceedings of the 15th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, 1974, edited by J. Armitage and I. Farquhar (Academic Press, New York, 1975) [reprinted in P.W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin/Cummings, New York, 1984)].
38. Note the similarity of this behavior to that of some lattice models (cf., for example, the dependence of the critical temperature on band filling shown in Fig. 18 of Ref. 3).
39. 2order parameters, we would presumably have found two second-order (instead of one first-order) phase transitions, in analogy with the similar results in Ref. 12. Clearly, such more elaborate variational calculation would be a necessary first step for an analysis of the critical behavior at these points.
40. N. Nagaosa, Quantum Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).
41. J. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988).
42. J. Hubbard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959).
43. P. Pieri and G. Strinati, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15 370 (2000).
44. B. Gyorffy, J. Staunton, and G. Stocks, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5190 (1991).
45. M. Bak and R. Micnas, in Proceedings of the European Conference Physics of Magnetism 99, Poznań, 1999 [Acta Phys. Pol. A 97 (2000)].
46. J. Quintanilla and B. Gyorffy, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 6591 (2002).
47. E. Garrido, P. Sarriguren, E.M. de Guerra, U. Lombardo, P. Schuck, and H.J. Schulze, Phys. Rev. C 63, 037304 (2001).
48. G. Bruun, Y. Castin, R. Dum, and K. Burnett, Eur. Phys. J. D 7, 433 (1999).
49. R. Combescot, Europhys. Lett. 55, 150 (2001).
50. M. Holland, S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, M.L. Chiofalo, and R. Walser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120406 (2001).
51. Y. Ohashi and A. Griffin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 130402 (2002).
52. D. Jin, Phys. World 15, 27 (2002).
53. H. Lin and J. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8155 (1986).
54. G. Röpke, A. Schnell, P. Schuck, and P. Nozières, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3177 (1998).
55. J. Burgy, M. Mayr, V. Martin-Mayor, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 277202 (2001).
56. v is taken into account. However, the expression in Ref. 23 does not admit a small-frequency expansion of the form (A3) because as is well known (Refs. 8 and 31) it has a branch cut along the real axis that crosses the imaginary axis whenever μ>0. (On the other hand, such an expression is the correct starting point for the derivation of a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory (Ref. 23), which obviously involves an expansion along the real axis.)
57. P. Strange, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998).