Where Should Implants Be Anchored in the Humeral Head?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 415, Issue , 2003, Pages 139-147

  Hepp, Pierre ^a   Lill, Helmut ^a   Bail, Hermann ^b   Korner, Jan ^a   Niederhagen, Manuel ^a   Haas, Norbert P ^b   Josten, Christoph ^a   Duda, Georg N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MASS; BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRUCTURE; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMERUS HEAD; IMPLANT; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORPHOMETRICS; MUSCLE MASS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THICKNESS; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 0142166152     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092968.12414.a8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amling M, Posl M, Ritzel H, et al: Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues: A histomorphometric analysis of the complete spinal column from 40 autopsy specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:262-269, 1996.
2. Cendre E, Mitton D, Roux J, et al: High-resolution computed tomography for architectural characterization of human lumbar cancellous bone: Relationships with histomorphometry and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 10:353-360, 1999.
3. Christiansen P, Steiniche T, Vesterby A, et al: Primary hyperparathyroidism: Iliac crest trabecular bone volume, structure, remodeling, and balance evaluated by histomorphometric methods. Bone 13:41-49, 1992.
4. Delling G: Altersabhängige Skeletveränderungen: Histomorphometrische Untersuchungen an der menschlichen Beckenkammspongiosa. Klin Wochenschr 52:318-325, 1974.
5. Delling G: Neuere Vorstelungen zu Bau und Struktur der menschlichen Spongiosa - Ergebnisse einer kombinierten zwei - und dreidimensionalen Analyse. Z Gesamte Inn Med 44:536-540, 1989.
6. Delling G, Amling M: Biomechemical stability of the skeleton: It is not only bone mass, but also bone structure that counts. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10: 601-606, 1995.
7. Dempster DW, Ferguson-Pell MW, Mellish RW, et al: Relationships between bone structure in the iliac crest and bone structure and strength in the lumbar spine. Osteoporos Int 3:90-96, 1993.
8. Denk W, Szilvassy J, Bauer G: Zur Altersbestimmung anhand der Struktur der proximalen Anteile von Humerus und Femur. Beitr Gerichtl Med 48: 673-678, 1990.
9. Ding M, Hvid I: Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. Bone 26:291-295, 2000.
10. Eriksen EF, Axelrod DW, Flemming F: Bone Histomorphometry: An Official Publication of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. New York, Raven Press 1994.
11. Frost HM: Changing views about 'Osteoporoses' (a 1998 overview). Osteoporos Int 10:345-352, 1999.
12. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, et al: Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 16:295-300, 1995.
13. Kawashima T, Uhthoff HK: Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: A radiologic, densitometric, and histomorphometric study. J Orthop Res 9:634-640, 1991.
14. Lill H, Josten C: Proximale und distale Humerus-frakturen im hohen Alter. Orthopäde 29:327-341, 2000.
15. Minton D, Cendre E, Roux JP, et al: Mechanical properties of ewe vertebral cancellous bone compared with histomorphometry and high-resolution computed tomography parameters. Bone 22:651-658, 1998.
16. Mosekilde L: Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength: Effects of loading. Z Rheumatol 59:1-9, 2000.
17. Olah AJ: Histomorphometrie des Knochens. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 58:104-113, 1974.
18. Parfitt AM: Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 82:68-72, 1987.
19. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glodeux FH, et al: Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2:595-610, 1987.
20. Parfitt HM: The Physiologic and Clinical Significance of Bone Histomorphometric Data. In Recker RR (ed). Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press 143-223, 1983.
21. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P: Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 20:92-102, 1998.
22. Rother P, Hunger H, Leopold D, Kropf G, Kruger G: Zur Bestimmung des Lebensalters und des Geschlechts aus Humerusmassen. Anat Anz 142:243-254, 1977.
23. Rother P, Kruger G, Machlitt J, Hunger H: Histomorphometrische sowie regressions- und faktor-analytische Untersuchungen von Altersveränderungen des Humerus. Anat Anz 144:346-365, 1978.
24. Sillár P, Kery L, Horvath F: Radiologische und histologische Untersuchung der degenerativen Erscheinungen des Caput humeri im Senium. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 112:476-481, 1974.
25. Smit TH, Odgaard A, Schneider E: Structure and function of vertebral trabecular bone. Spine 22:2823-2833, 1997.
26. Smit TH, Schneider E, Odgaard A: Star length distribution: A volume-based concept for the characterization of structural anisotropy. J Microsc 191:249-257, 1998.
27. Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L: A new method of comprehensive static histomorphometry applied on human lumbar vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 27:129-138, 2000.
28. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, et al: A morphometric comparison of trabecular structure of human ilium between microcomputed tomography and conventional histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 61:493-498, 1997.
29. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, Ruegsegger P: The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 25:55-60, 1999.