Independence and separability of volume and mass in the size-weight illusion

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 831-843

  Oberle, Crystal D ^a   Amazeen, Eric L ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WEIGHT PERCEPTION;

EID: 0142166141     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194818     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. AMAZEEN, E. L. (1997). The effects of volume on perceived heaviness by dynamic touch: With and without vision. Ecological Psychology, 9, 245-263.
2. AMAZEEN, E. L. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 102-119.
3. AMAZEEN, E. L., & TURVEY, M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 213-232.
4. ANDERSON, N. H. (1970). Averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 1-4.
5. ANDERSON, N. H. (1972). Cross-task validation of functional measurement. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 389-395.
6. ASHBY, F. G., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1986), Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
7. CHARPENTIER, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale de quelques elements de la sensation de poids [Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception]. Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques, 3, 122-135.
8. DAVIS, C. M., & ROBERTS, W. (1976). Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 33-36.
9. ELLIS, R. R., & LEDERMAN, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 315-324.
10. EPSTEIN, W. (1982). Percept-percept couplings. Perception, 11, 75-83.
11. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. GOUREVITCH, V., & GALANTER, E. (1967). A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions. Psychometrika, 32, 25-33.
13. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
14. HAUTUS, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46-51.
15. JONES, L. A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: Theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 29-42.
16. KADLEC, H. (1995). Multidimensional signal detection analyses (MSDA) for testing separability and independence: A Pascal program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 442-458.
17. KADLEC, H. (1999a). MSDA_2: Updated version of software for multi-dimensional signal detection analyses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 384-385.
18. KADLEC, H. (1999b). Statistical properties of d′ and β estimates of signal detection theory. Psychological Methods, 4, 22-43.
19. KADLEC, H., & HICKS, C. L. (1998). Invariance of perceptual spaces and perceptual separability of stimulus dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 80-104.
20. KADLEC, H., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1992a). Implications of marginal and conditional detection parameters for the separabilities and independence of perceptual dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 325-374.
21. KADLEC, H., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1992b), Signal detection analyses of dimensional interactions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 181-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. KLOOS, H., & AMAZEEN, E. L. (2002). Perceiving heaviness by dynamic touch: An investigation of the size-weight illusion in preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 171-183.
23. KOSELEFF, P. (1957). Studies in the perception of heaviness. Acta Psychologica, 13, 242-252.
24. LOOMIS, J. M., & LEDERMAN, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 31.1-31.41). New York: Wiley.
25. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. MARASCUILO, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35, 237-243.
27. MASIN, S. C., & CRESTONI, L. (1988). Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 309-312.
28. MILLER, J. (1996). The sampling distribution of d′. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 65-72.
29. MURRAY, D. J., ELLIS, R. R., BANDOMIR, C. A., & Ross, H. E. (1999). Charpentier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1681-1685.
30. PICK, H. L., & PICK, A. D. (1967). A developmental and analytic study of the size-weight illusion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 5, 362-371.
31. ROBERTSON, C. C., & MORGAN, B. J. T. (1990). Aspects of the design and analysis of signal detection experiments. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 42, 7-14.
32. ROSS, H. E. (1969). When is a weight not illusory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 346-355.
33. ROSS, H. E., & GREGORY, R. L. (1970). Weight illusions and weight discrimination: A revised hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 318-328.
34. ROSS, J., & DI LOLLO, V. (1970). Differences in heaviness in relation to density and weight. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 161-162.
35. RUNESON, S. (1977). On the visual perception of dynamic events. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
36. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 733-740.
37. RUNESON, S., & FRYKHOLM, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
38. STEVENS, J. C., & RUBIN, L. L. (1970). Psychophysical scales of apparent heaviness and the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 225-230.
39. THOMAS, R. D. (2001). Characterizing perceptual interactions in face identification using multidimensional signal detection theory. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contests and challenges (pp. 193-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. WENGER, M. J., & INGVALSON, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 872-892.
41. WICKENS, T. D., & OLZAK, L. A. (1992). Three views of association in concurrent detection ratings. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 229-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.