Kondo effect in quantum dots coupled to ferromagnetic leads

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2003, Pages

  Martinek, J ^a,b,c   Utsumi, Y ^d,e   Imamura, H ^d   Barnas J ^c,f   Maekawa, S ^b   Konig J ^a   Schon G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PHYSICS   (Poland)

^d TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e Max Planck Instutut für Mikrostrukturphysik   (Germany)

^f ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FERROMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIZATION;

KONDO RESONANCE;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 0142157607     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.127203     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A.C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1993).
2. D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al, Nature (London) 391, 156 (1998).10.1038/34373
3. S.M. Cronenwett et al, Science 281, 540 (1998); 10.1126/science.281.5376.540
4. J. Schmid et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5824 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5824
5. W.G. van der Wiel et al, Science 289, 2105 (2000).10.1126/science.289.5487.2105
6. S. Sasaki et al, Nature (London) 405, 764 (2000).10.1038/35015509
7. J. Nygård, D.H. Cobden, and P.E. Lindelof, Nature (London) 408, 342 (2000).10.1038/35042545
8. M. Pustilnik, Y. Avishai, and K. Kikoin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1756 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1756
9. M. Eto and Yu.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 085322 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.64.085322
10. M. Pustilnik and L.I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2993 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2993
11. M. PustilnikL.I. GlazmanPhys. Rev. B 64, 045328 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.64.045328
12. L.I. Glazman and M.E. Raikh, JETP Lett.JTPLA2 47, 452 (1988);
13. T.K. Ng and P.A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1768 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1768
14. P.W. Anderson, J. Phys. C 3, 2439 (1970).
15. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 416 (1978).10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.416
16. Y. Meir, N.S. Wingreen, and P.A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2601 (1993); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2601
17. N.S. Wingreen and Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11?040 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.11040
18. J. König, J. Schmid, H. Schoeller, and G. Schön, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16?820 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.16820
19. H. Schoeller and J. König, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3686 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3686
20. T.A. Costi, A.C. Hewson, and V. Zlatić, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6, 2519 (1994).10.1088/0953-8984/6/13/013
21. V. Dorin and P. Schlottmann, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5095 (1993); 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.5095
22. V. DorinP. SchlottmannJ. Appl. Phys. 73, 5400 (1993).
23. In N. Sergueev et al, Phys. Rev. B 65, 165303 (2002), the authors analyze the Anderson model by using an equations of motion scheme without the additional self-consistency assumption and found no splitting of zero-bias anomaly.10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165303
24. J.E. Moore and X-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1722 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1722
25. T.A. Costi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1504 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1504
26. T.A. CostiPhys. Rev. B 64, 241310 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.64.241310
27. K. Tsukagoshi, B.W. Alphenaar, and H. Ago, Nature (London) 401, 572 (1999).10.1038/44108
28. M.R. Buitelaar et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 156801 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.156801
29. D.C. Ralph and R.A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3401 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3401
30. A. Kubetzka et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057201 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.057201