Can a brief video intervention improve breast cancer clinical trial knowledge and beliefs?

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 193-205

  Curbow, Barbara ^a   Fogarty, Linda A ^a   McDonnell, Karen ^a   Chill, Julia ^a   Scott, Lisa Benz ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Beliefs; Breast cancer; Clinical trials; Knowledge; USA; Video intervention

Indexed keywords

CANCER;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; LIFESPAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PROBABILITY; RACE DIFFERENCE; SCORING SYSTEM; TEACHING; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 0142155663     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00162-X     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aaronson N.K., Visser-Pol E., Leenhouts G.H.M.W., Muller M.J., van der Schot A., van Dam F.S., Keus R.B., Koning C.C., ten Bokkel Huinink W.W., van Dong J.A., Dubbleman R. Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 14:1996;984-996.
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50:1991;179-211.
3. Cassileth B.R., Lusk E.J., Miller D.S., Hurwitz S. Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. Journal of the American Medical Association. 248(8):1982;968-970.
4. Cox K. Enhancing cancer clinical trial management. Recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences Psycho-Oncology. 9:2000;314-322.
5. Daugherty C.K. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials. A medical oncology perspective Journal of Clinical Oncology. 17:1999;1601-1617.
6. Davis S.W., Nealon E.O., Stone J.C. Evaluation of the National Cancer Institute's clinical trials booklet. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph. 14:1993;139-145.
7. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. 1993;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth.
8. Ellis P.M., Butow P.N. Focus group interviews examining attitudes to randomized trials among breast cancer patients and the general community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 22:1998;528-531.
9. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. An introduction to theory and research:1975;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
10. Fogarty L.A., Curbow B., Wingard J.R., McDonnell K., Somerfield M.R. Can 40 seconds of compassion reduce patient anxiety? Journal of Clinical Oncology. 17:1999;371-379.
11. Itoh K., Sasaki Y., Fujii H., Wakita H., Igarashi T., Abe K. Patients in phase I trials of anti-cancer agents in Japan. Motivation, comprehension and expectations British Journal of Cancer. 76:1997;107-113.
12. Janz N.K., Becker M.H. The health belief model. A decade later Health Education Quarterly. 11:1984;1-47.
13. Jepson C., Chaiken S. Chronic issue-specific fear inhibits systematic processing of persuasive communications. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 5:1990;61-84.
14. Krouse H.J. Video modeling to educate patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 33:2001;748-757.
15. Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., McGreal M.J., Thiel E.C., Fine S., Erlichman C. Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials. Measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation Social Science and Medicine. 32:1991;35-42.
16. Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Thiel E.C., Sem F.W.C., Woermke D.E.H. Presenting clinical trial information. A comparison of methods. Patient Education and Counseling. 25:1995;97-107.
17. Lovegrove E., Rumsey N., Harcourt D., Cawthorn S.J. Factors implicated in the decision whether or not to join the tamoxifen trial in women at high familial risk of breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 9:2000;193-202.
18. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Attitudes and persuasion. Classic and contemporary approaches:1981;Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.
19. Ries, L. A. G., Eisner, M. P., Kosary, C. L., Hankey, B. F., Miller, B. A., Clegg, L., & Edwards (Eds.), (2002). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Available: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/,2002.
20. Sawka C.A., Pritchard K.I. Can improved communication increase patient participation in randomized clinical trials? European Journal of Cancer. 37:2001;297-299.
21. Schapira M.M., Meade C., Nattinger A.B. Enhanced decision-making. The use of a videotape decision-aid for patients with prostate cancer Patient Education and Counseling. 30:1997;119-127.
22. Simes R.J., Tattersall M.H.N., Coates A.S., Raghavan D., Solomon H.J., Smartt H. Randomized comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer. British Medical Journal. 293:1986;1065-1068.
23. Spielberger C.D. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory STAI (form Y) "self-evaluation questionnaire. 1983;Consulting Psychologists Press, " Palo Alto, CA.
24. Valentino J., Andrykowski M.A., Wood T.A. Population attitudes toward oncology clinical trials. Kentucky Medical Association. 97:1999;111-117.
25. Weinstein N. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2:1980;11-20.
26. Weinstein N. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 5:1982;441-460.
27. Weinstein N.D. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology. 7:1988;355-386.
28. Wiley F.M., Ruccione K., Moore I.M., McGuire-Cullen P., Fergusson J., Waskerwitz M.J., Perrin G., Gee J., Satber H.N. Parents' perceptions of randomization in pediatric clinical trials. Cancer Practice. 7:1999;248-256.
29. Wilson J.L., Stein D.S. The impact of public education videotapes on knowledge about cancer. Journal of Cancer Education. 12:1997;51-54.