Reorganization of Gait After Limb-Saving Surgery of the Lower Limb

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 825-831

  De Visser, Enrico ^a   Veth, Rene P H ^a   Schreuder, H W Bart ^a   Duysens, Jacques ^a,b   Mulder, Theo ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b SINT MAARTENSKLINIEK   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Attention; Gait; Limb Saving Surgery; Recovery; Vision

Indexed keywords

GAIT ANALYSIS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; SURGERY;

LIMB-SAVING SURGERY;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; LEG; LIMB SALVAGE; LIMB TUMOR; LOCOMOTION; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREADMILL; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; WALKING; WALKING SPEED;

ADULT; AGED; BONE NEOPLASMS; CHONDROSARCOMA; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; LEG; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOSARCOMA; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SALVAGE THERAPY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION;

EID: 0142151047     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000091981.41025.FC     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Veth RP, van Hoesel QG, Bokkerink JP, et al: The art of limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1995;21:77-103
2. de Visser E, Deckers JA, Veth RP, et al: Deterioration of balance control after limb-saving surgery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:358-65
3. de Visser E, Pauwels J, Duysens JE, et al: Gait adaptations during walking under visual and cognitive constraints: A study of patients recovering from limb-saving surgery of the lower limb. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998;77:503-9
4. de Visser E, Mulder T, Schreuder HW, et al: Gait and electromyographic analysis of patients recovering after limb-saving surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000;15:592-9
5. Tsuboyama T, Windhager R, Bochdansky T, et al: Gait after knee arthroplasty for femoral tumor: Foot pressure patterns recorded in 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:51-4
6. Kawai A, Backus SI, Otis JC, et al: Gait characteristics of patients after proximal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumour. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000;82: 666-9
7. Kawai A, Backus SI, Otis JC, et al: Interrelationships of clinical outcome, length of resection, and energy cost of walking after prosthetic knee replacement following resection of a malignant tumor of the distal aspect of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998;80:822-31
8. Otis JC, Lane JM, Kroll MA: Energy cost during gait in osteosarcoma patients after resection and knee replacement and after above-the-knee amputation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985;67:606-11
9. Mulder T, Nienhuis B, Pauwels J: Clinical gait analysis in a rehabilitation context: Some controversial issues. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:99-106
10. Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, et al: Postural reorganization following lower limb amputation: Possible motor and sensory determinants of recovery. Scand J Rehabil Med 1992;24:83-90
11. Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, et al: Dual-task assessment of reorganization of postural control in persons with-lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:1059-64
12. Mulder T, Zijlstra W, Geurts A: Assessment of motor recovery and decline. Gait Posture 2002;16:198-210
13. Tsuboyama T, Windhager R, Dock W, et al: Knee function after operation for malignancy of the distal femur: Quadriceps muscle mass and knee extension strength in 21 patients with hinged endoprostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64:673-7
14. Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Martin C, et al: Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults. Gait Posture 2001;14:211-6
15. Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, et al: Stride length regulation in Parkinson's disease: Normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms. Brain 1996; 119(pt 2):551-68
16. Patla AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, et al: Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1991;17:603-34