Perceptions of cutting edge research in UK social science

Innovation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 271-291

  Forbes, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; PERCEPTION;

EID: 0142122904     PISSN: 13511610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1351161032000126044     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Daniel, H.-D. (1993), Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review, Russey, W. E. (trans.), Weinheim, VCH.
2. Day, A. (1996), How to Get Research Published in Journals, London, Gower.
3. Galtung, J. (1967), Theory and Methods of Social Research, London, Allen & Unwin.
4. Georgia Tech (n.d.), .
5. Godlee, F. and Jefferson, T. (1999), Peer Review in the Health Sciences, London, BMJ Books.
6. Haldane, J. B. S. (1968), Science and Life: Essays of a Rationalist, London, Pemberton in association with Barrie and Rockliff.
7. Horrobin, D. (2001), 'Opinion: Something Rotten at the Core of Science?', Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 2, February, pp. 51-52.
8. King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
9. Page, D. (2000), 'An interview with Harmon Craig', Science Spectra, Vol. 20, pp. 14-18.
10. RAE 2001 (n.d.), http://www.hero.ac.uk/rae/