The Origins of Developmental Psychology

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 347-357

  Keil, Frank C ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142110525     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327647JCD0103_4     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York, Columbia University Press.
3. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85-116). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychlogy. New York, Dover.
5. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
6. Frith, U. (1999). Autism. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 58-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Gelman, S., & Hirschfeld, L. (1999). How biological is essentialism? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 403-446). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Hauser, M., MacNeilage, P., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 1514-1517.
10. Jordan, M. I., & Russell, S. (1999). Computational intelligence. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. lxxiii-xc). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Keil, F. C. (1998). Cognitive science and the origins of thought and knowledge. In W. Damon (Editor-in-Chief) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 341-413). New York: Wiley.
13. Keil, F., Smith, C., Simons, D., & Levin, D. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism. Cognition, 65, 103-135.
14. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353-382.
15. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
16. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
17. Neisser, U. (1963). The multiplicity of thought. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 1-14.
18. Premack, D., & Premack, A. (1994). Levels of causal understanding in chimpanzees and children. Cognition, 50, 347-362.
19. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
20. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case fortwo systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
21. Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1993). Cognition without concepts. Cognitive Development, 8, 181-188.
22. Titchener, E. B. (1898/1905). A primer of psychology. New York: MacMillan.
23. Wundt, W. M. (1897). Outlines of psychology. New York: G. E. Stechert