An in vitro comparison of tensile bond strengths of noble and base metal alloys to enamel

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 175-183

  Parsa, Roya Zand ^a,c   Goldstein, Gary R ^b   Barrack, Gerald M ^b   LeGeros, Racquel Z ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALLOY; METHACRYLIC ACID; PHOSPHATE; TIN; WATER; WAX; 6 (4 VINYLBENZYL N PROPYL)AMINO 1,3,5 TRIAZINE 2,4 DITHIOL; 6-(4-VINYLBENZYL-N-PROPYL)AMINO-1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4-DITHIOL; DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; MDP ADHESION PROMOTING MONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUND; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN CEMENT; TRIAZINE DERIVATIVE;

AIRBORNE PARTICLE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CEMENTATION; CLEANING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ENAMEL; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMIDITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; POLYMERIZATION; RANDOMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STORAGE; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THICKNESS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; VELOCITY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ELECTROPLATING INDUSTRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; ELECTROPLATING; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; TIN; TRIAZINES;

EID: 0142061937     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00411-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Thompson V.P., Del-Castillo E., Livaditis G.J. Resin bonded retainers. Part I. Resin bond to electrolytically etched non-precious alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 50:1983;771-779.
2. Rochette A.L. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 30:1973;418-423.
3. Livaditis G.J., Thompson V.P. Etched casting an improved retentive mechanism for resin-bonded retainers . J Prosthet Dent. 47:1982;52-58.
4. Watanabe F., Powers J.M., Lorey R.E. In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to dental alloys. J Dent Res. 67:1988;479-483.
5. Wiltshire W.A., Ferreira M.R. A classification of resin-bonded bridges based on the evolutionary changes of the different technique types. Quintessence Dent Technol. 11:1987;253-258.
6. O'Connor R.P., Nayyar A., Kovarik R.E. Effect of internal microblasting on retention of cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 64:1990;557-562.
7. McLaughlin G.T., Rochette A.L., Sossamon J. Direct bonded retainers: the advanced alternative. 1986;J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia. p. 117-52.
8. Inoue K., Murakami T., Terada Y. The bond strength of porcelain to Ni-Cr alloy - the influence of tin or chromium plating. Int J Prosthodont. 5:1992;262-268.
9. Degrange M, Roulet JF. Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Carol Stream (IL): Quintessence; 1997. p. 161-8.
10. Taira Y., Yanagida H., Matsumura H., Yoshida K., Atsuta M., Suzuki S. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a thione-phosphate dual functional primer and self-curing luting agents. Eur J Oral Sci. 108:2000;456-460.
11. Gates W.D., Diaz-Arnold A.M., Aquilino S.A., Ryther J.S. Comparison of the adhesive strengths of a BIS-GMA cement to tin-plated and non-tin-plated alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 69:1993;12-16.
12. Imbery T.A., Burgess J.O., Naylor W.P. Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 5:1992;59-67.
13. Lynde T.A., Whitehill J.M., Coffey J.P., Meiers J.C. The bond strength of an adhesive resin luting cement to a variety of surface treatments of a high-palladium copper alloy. J Prosthodont. 5:1996;295-300.
14. Stoknorm R., Isidor F., Ravnholt G. Tensile bond strength of resin luting cement to a porcelain-fusing noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont. 9:1996;323-330.
15. Rubo J.H., Pegoraro L.F., Ferreira P.M. A comparison of tensile bond strength of resin-retained prostheses made using five alloys. Int J Prosthodont. 9:1996;277-281.
16. Creugers N.H., Welle P.R., Vrijhoef M.M. Four bonding systems for resin-retained cast metal prostheses. Dent Mater. 4:1988;85-88.
17. Garcia-Godoy F., Kaiser D.A., Malone W.F., Hubbard G. Shear bond strength of two resin adhesives for acid-etched metal prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 65:1991;787-789.
18. Tanaka T., Hirano M., Kawahara M., Matsumura H., Atsuta M. A new ion-coating surface treatment of alloys for dental adhesive resins. J Dent Res. 67:1988;1376-1380.
19. Watanabe F., Powers J.M., Lorey R.E. In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to dental alloys. J Dent Res. 67:1988;479-483.
20. Imbery T.A., Davis R.D. Evaluation of tin-plating systems for a high-noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont. 6:1993;55-60.
21. Ayad M.F., Rosenstiel S.F. Preliminary evaluation of tin-plating for extracoronal restorations evaluation of marginal quality and retention . Int J Prosthodont. 11:1998;44-48.
22. Ogunyinka A. A simple method of increasing the adhesion between resinous cements and tinplated gold alloy a pilot study . J Prosthet Dent. 80:1998;302-306.
23. Antoniadou M., Kern M., Strub J.R. Effect of a new metal primer on the bond strength between a resin cement and two high-noble alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 84:2000;554-560.