A comparison of tensile bond strengths of resin-retained prostheses made using five alloys

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 277-281

  Rubo, José Henrique ^a,b   Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando ^a   Ferreira, Paulo Martins ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; PANAVIA EX; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; TIN;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE; ELECTROPLATING INDUSTRY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED, RESIN-BONDED; ELECTROPLATING; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; PHOSPHATES; RESIN CEMENTS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIN;

EID: 0030136374     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Moon PC, Knap FJ. Acid-etched bridge bond strength utilizing a new retention method [abstract 296]. J Dent Res 1983;62(special issue):682.
2. Omura I, Yamauchi J, Harada I, Wada T. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive [abstract 561]. J Dent Res 1984;63(special issue):233.
3. Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:418-423.
4. Thompson VP, Livaditis GJ, Del-Castillo E. Resin bond to electrolytically etched non-precious alloys for resin-bonded prostheses [abstract 265]. J Dent Res 1981;60(special issue):377.
5. Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF. Tensile bond strength of a composite resin cement for bonded prosthesis to various dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent Res 1995;74:230-234.
6. Wada T. Development of a new adhesive material and its properties. In: Gettleman L, Vrijhoef MMA, Uchiyama Y (eds). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adhesive Prosthodontics. [24 June 1986, Amsterdam, Netherlands]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Eurosound Drukkeij 1986:9-19.
7. Thompson VP. Electrolytic etching modes of various non-precious alloys for resin bonding [abstract 65]. J Dent Res 1982;61 (special issue):186.
8. El-Sherif MH, El-Messery A, Halhoul MN. The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:782-786.
9. El-Sherif MH, Shillingburg HT, Duncanson MG. Comparison of the bond strength of resin-bonded retainers using two metal etching techniques. Quintessence Int 1989;20:385-388.
10. Murakami I, Barrack G. Relationship of surface area and design to the bond strength of etched cast restorations: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:539-545.
11. Pegoraro LF, Barrack G. A comparison of bond strengths of adhesive cast restorations using different designs, bonding agents, and luting resins. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:133-138.
12. Creugers NHJ, Welle PR, Vrijhoef MMA. Four bonding systems for resin-retained cast metal prostheses. Dent Mater 1988;4(2):85-88.
13. Hembree JH, Cooper EW. Effect of die relief on retention of cast crowns and inlays. Oper Dent 1979;4(3):104-109.
14. Posti JJ, Nakki K, Sliirila HS. A comparative study of the retention of two bridge retainers: Cemented partial crowns versus adhesive resin bonded inlays. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1980;76(516):258-261.
15. Uchiyama Y. Adhesion on prosthetic restorations. In: Gettleman L, Vrijhoef MMA, Uchiyama Y (eds). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adhesive Prosthodontics. [24 June, 1986, Amsterdam, Netherlands]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Eurosound Drukkeij 1986:21-31.
16. Vermiyea SG, Kuffles MS, Huget EF. The effects of die relief agents on the retention of full coverage castings. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:207-210.
17. Watanabe F, Powers JM, Lorey RE. In vitro bonding of prosthodontic adhesives to dental alloys. J Dent Res 1988;67:479-483.