Applications of distortion-product emissions to an otological practice

Laryngoscope

Volumn 109, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1908-1918

  Kimberley, Barry P ^a,b  

^a Minnesota Head and Neck Pain Clinic   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear physiology; Otoacoustic emissions; Screening of infants' hearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHLEA; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; TINNITUS;

EID: 0032703359     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199912000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. The level and growth behavior of the 2F1-F2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:3431-3444.
2. Voss S, Allen J. Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95:372-384.
3. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64: 1386-1391.
4. Gold T. Hearing II: The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 1948;135:492-498.
5. Kemp DT, Brown AM. An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal. In: deBoer E, Viergever MA, eds. Mechanics of Hearing. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984:75-82.
6. Ohlms L, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin B. Acoustic-distortion products: separation of sensory from neural dysfunction in sensorineural hearing loss in human beings and rabbits. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:159-174.
7. Brownell WE. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:82-92.
8. Hudspeth AJ. Extracellular current flow and the site of transduction by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci 1982;2:2-10.
9. Margolis R, Trine M. Influence of middle-ear disease on otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette M, Gladttke T, eds. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997:130-150.
10. Long GR, Tubis A. Modifications of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84:1343-1353.
11. Liberman C, Dodds L. Acute ultrastructural changes in acoustic trauma: Serial-section reconstruction of the stereocilia and cuticular plates. Hear Res 1987;26:45-64.
12. Patuzzi R, Yates G, Johnstone B. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 1989;42: 47-72.
13. Ohlemiller K, Hughes R, Mosinger-Ogilvie J. Cochlear anomalies in a candidate mouse model of Usher's syndrome. In: Abstracts of the 18th Midwinter Research Meeting of ARO. 1995; 346:87.
14. Paparella MM, Schachern PA. Sensorineural hearing loss in children: genetic. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, Meyerhoff WL, Gluckman JL, eds. Otolaryngology. vol 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991:1579-1600.
15. Kimberley BP, Hernadi H, Lee AM, Brown D. Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emission and age. Ear Hear 1994;15: 199-209.
16. Ramatowski D, Kimberley B. Age and the human cochlear travelling wave delay. Ear Hear 1998;19:111-119.
17. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:467-477.
18. Kimberley BP. Distortion product emission features and the prediction of pure tone thresholds. Laryngoscope 1995;105: 349-353.
19. Dorn P, Piskorski P, Keefe D, Neely S, Gorga M. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:964-971.
20. Kimberley B, Brown D, Allen B. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. In: Robinette E, Glattke T, eds. Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1997:181-204.
21. Nelson D, Kimberley B. Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35: 1142-1159.
22. Kimberley BP, Kimberley BM, Roth L. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions. Ear Nose Throat J 1994;73: 11-20.
23. Gorga M, Neely S, Ohlrich B, Hoover B, Redner J, Peters J. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear 1997;18:440-455.
24. Bluestone C. Universal newborn screening for hearing loss: ideal vs. reality and the role of otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;115:89-93.
25. Bess F, Paradise J. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial, and not presently justified. Pediatrics 1994;93: 330-334.
26. Downs M. Universal newborn hearing screening: the Colorado story. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995;32: 257-259.
27. Allen J, Kimberley B, Shaw G. Characterization of the nonlinear ear canal impedence at low sound levels [abstract]. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Conf Record 1995;18:114.
28. Janssen T, Kummer P, Arnold W. Growth behavior of the 2F1-F2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:3418-3430.
29. Kimberley B, Brown D, Eggermont J. Measuring human cochlear travelling wave delay using distortion product emission phase responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94: 1343-1350.