Management of turtle bycatch: Can endangered species be protected while minimizing socioeconomic impacts?

Coastal Management

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 423-434

  Santora, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Bycatch; Endangered species; Fishery management; Sea turtles

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MARINE BIOLOGY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

SEA TURTLES;

COASTAL ENGINEERING;

BYCATCH; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TURTLE;

UNITED STATES;

CHELONIIDAE; PLEURONECTOIDEI; TESTUDINES;

EID: 0141976768     PISSN: 08920753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08920750390232956     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boettcher, R. 2001. North Carolina sea turtle stranding summary. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission.
2. Collazo, J. A., and S. P. Epperly. 1995. Accuracy tests for sonic telemetry studies in an estuarine environment. Journal of Wildlife Management 59(1):181-188.
3. Epperly, S. P., J. Braun, and A. Veishlow. 1990. Distribution and species composition of sea turtles in North Carolina. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology, T. H. Richardson, J. J. Richardson, and M. Donnelly, compilers. NOAA Tech. Memo, NMFS-SEFC-278, p. 95.
4. Epperly, S. P., J. Braun, and A. Chester. 1995. Aerial surveys for sea turtles in North Carolina inshore waters. Fishery Bulletin 93:254-261.
5. Epperly, S. P., J. Braun, and A. Veishlow. 1995. Sea turtle in North Carolina waters. Conservation Biology 9(2):384-394.
6. Epperly, S. P., A. Veishlow, and J. Braun. 1991. Distribution and species composition of sea turtles in North Carolina, 1989-1990. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology, M. Salmon and J. Wyneken. compilers. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFC-302, pp. 155-156.
7. Hall, M. 1996. On bycatches. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6:319-352.
8. Hanna, S. S. 1998. Institutions for marine ecosystems: Economic incentives and fishery management. Ecological Application 8(1) Supplement: S170-S174.
9. Miller, R. J. 1990. Properties of a well-managed nearshore fishery. Fisheries 15(5):7-12.
10. Murawski, S. A. 1995. "Meeting the Challenges of Bycatch: New Rules and New Tools." In Alaska Sea Grant. Solving Bycatch: Considerations for Today and Tomorrow: Proceedings of the Bycatch Workshop, September 25-27, 1995, Seattle, Washington. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report No. 96-03. University of Alaska Fairbanks.
11. NOAA. Dept. of Commerce. 2001. Federal Register, 66(192):50350-50354. 50 CFR Part 223.
12. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. 2001. Draft application for individual incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
13. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. 2001. Proclamations M-12-2000, M-10-2000, M-3-2001, M-10-2002, and M-12-2002. http://www.ncfisheries.net/procs/index.html. Last accessed on 1/6/03.
14. North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. 2002. Commercial landings, http://www.ncfisheries.net/comstat/fluke.htm.
15. Santora, C. 2002. Endangered species interactions with an inshore gillnet fishery: Fisher perspectives on bycatch management. Master's Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
16. Steve, C., J. Gearhart, D. Borggaard, L. Sabo, and A. Hohn. 2001. Draft 5: Characterization of North Carolina commercial fisheries with frequent or occasional interactions with marine mammals. Unpublished Report by NIMFS and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
17. Turtle Expert Working Group. 2000. Assessment update for the Kemp's Ridley and Loggerhead sea turtle populations in the Western North Atlantic. U.S. Dept. of Commerce. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-444.
18. Warren, B. (ed.). 1994. Win-win bycatch solutions: A handbook for collaboration. Seattle, WA: National Fisheries Conservation Center. National Fisheries Conservation Center Journal Publications.