The rhetoric of modernization and the labour government’s pay Agenda

Public Money and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 223-228

  Hamilton, Peter M ^a   Redman, Tom ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141941753     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00376     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bach, S. (2002), Public-sector employment relations reform under Labour: Muddling through on modernization. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 2, pp. 319-339.
2. Bach, S. and Winchester, D. (2003), Industrial relations in the public sector. In Edwards, P. (Ed), Industrial Relations (Blackwell, Oxford).
3. Boyne, G., Kirkpatrick, I. and Kitchener, M. (2001), Introduction to the symposium on new Labour and the modernization of public management. Public Administration, 79, 1, pp. 1-4.
4. Cabinet Office (1999), Modernizing Government (The Stationery Office, London).
5. Corbett, E. P. J. and Connors, J. (1999), Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student, 4th edn (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
6. Cunningham, D. S. (1991), Faithful Persuasion: In Aid of a Rhetoric of Christian Theology (University of Notre Dame Press, London).
7. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998), Modernizing Local Government, Improving Local Services Through Best Value (The Stationery Office, London).
8. Department of Health (2003), The New NHS Pay System: An Overview (London).
9. Department of Health (1997), The New NHS: Modern, Dependable (The Stationery Office, London).
10. Dixon, P. (1971), Rhetoric (Routledge, London).
11. Foss, S. K., Foss, K. A. and Trapp, R. (1991), Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric (Waveland Press, Illinois).
12. Foster, A. (2003), A Modernized NHS Pay System (Department of Health, London).
13. Game, C. (2002), Britain’s ‘5 per cent’ local government revolution: The faltering impact of New Labour’s modernization agenda. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, pp. 405-417.
14. Gill, A. M. and Whedbee, K. (1997), Rhetoric. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed), Discourse as Structure and Process (Sage, London), pp. 157-184.
15. Grimshaw, D. (2000), The problem with pay flexibility: Changing pay practices in the UK health sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 5, pp. 943-966
16. Hairston, M. C. (1986), Bringing Aristotle’s enthymeme into the composition classroom. In Moss, J. D. (Ed), Rhetoric and Praxis (Catholic University of American Press, Washington, D.C.).
17. Harrison, S. (2002), New Labour: Modernization and the medical labour process. Journal of Social Policy, 31, 3, pp. 465-485.
18. Health Service Circular (1999), Agenda for Change—Modernizing the NHS Pay System (Department of Health, Leeds).
19. Maddock, S. (2002), Making modernization work: New narratives, change strategies and people management in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 1, pp. 13-32.
20. McCloskey, D. (1994), How and why to do a rhetorical analysis. In Backhouse, R. (Ed), New Directions in Economic Methodology (Routledge, London).
21. Midwinter, A. (2001), New Labour and the modernization of British local government: A critique. Financial Accountability and Management, 17, 4, pp. 311-320.
22. Nash, W. (1989), Rhetoric: The Wit of Persuasion (Blackwell, Oxford).
23. Newman, J. (2002a), The new public management, modernization and institutional change: Disruptions, disjunctures and dilemmas. In McLaughlin, K., Osbourne, S. and Ferlie, E. (Eds), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects (Routledge, London).
24. Newman, J. (2002b), Changing governance, changing equality? New Labour, modernization and public services. Public Money & Management, 22, 1, pp. 7-13.
25. NHS Executive (1998), Working Together: Securing a Quality Workforce for the NHS (Department of Health, Leeds).
26. van Eemeron, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, R. and Jacobs, S. (1997), Argumentation. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed), Discourse as Structure and Process (Sage, London).