Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 205-212

  Fruits, Terry J ^a   VanBrunt, Corbyn L ^b   Khajotia, Sharukh S ^a   Duncanson Jr , Manville G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cervical resin composite restoration; Class V restoration; Cyclic fatigue; Elasticity; Lateral forces; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

AELITEFLO; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILUX PLUS; TPH HYBRID;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 0036517551     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986;17:103-111.
2. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987;12:53-87.
3. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. J Dent Res 1992;71:1525-1529.
4. Unterbrink GL, Muesner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23(3):183-189.
5. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 1986;65:1319-1321.
6. Tortenson BC, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composites. Dent Mater 1989;5:218-223.
7. Feilzer JA, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:167-171.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Gladys S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW (eds). Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:149-153.
9. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Brunson WD, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Bayne SC. Twelve month study of dentinal adhesives in Class V cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116: 179-183.
10. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
11. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-1702.
12. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:374-380.
13. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Stress induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:718-722.
14. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AC, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000;31:267-274.
15. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Change KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-A finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:451-459.
16. Kemp-Sholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 1988;67:841-845.
17. Kemp-Sholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
18. Willer RD, Collard EW, Duncanson MG Jr. An assessment of marginal microleakage in cervical restorations with gingival margins in dentin. Okla Dent Assoc J 1986;77(Fall): 31-36.
19. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables on clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4:247-250.
20. Campanella LC, Meiers JC. Microleakage of composites and compomers in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1999;12: 185-189.
21. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-784.
22. Tjan AHL, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect various incremental techniques on marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-66.
23. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:497-503.
24. Kanca J III, Suh BI. Pulse activation: Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999;12:107-112.
25. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77: 1435-1445.