Coming in from the cold? an analysis of research proposals submitted by the nursing section at ScHARR, 1994-1997

Journal of Research in Nursing

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 405-413

  Brooker, Charles ^a   Read, Susan ^a   Morrell, C Jane ^a   Repper, Julie ^a   Jones, Roy ^a   Akehurst, Ron ^a  

^a Health Services Research Section   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health services research; Research and development; Research funding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141892562     PISSN: 17449871     EISSN: 1744988X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136140969700200603     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rafferty, A., Traynor, M. Quality and quantity in research policy for nursing. Nursing Times Research 1997; 2:1, 16-27.
2. Collins, K. The Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research. Nursing Standard 1996; 10:45, 32-33.
3. Department of Health. Research and Development: Towards an evidence-based health service. London: Department of Health, 1996.
4. Baker, M., Kirk, S. Research and Development for the NHS: Evidence, evaluation and effectiveness. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1996.
5. Read, S. Integrating research, education and practice in nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1994; 3: 69-70.
6. Read, S., Roberts-Davis, M. An informative strategy to support nursing and midwifery research. Health Informatics 1995; 1: 108-112.
7. Nuffield Provinical Hospital Trust. A Fresh Look at Policies for Health Services Research. Occasional Paper No. 3. London: NPHT, 1985.
8. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Priorities in Medical Research Vol. 1. London: HMSO, 1988.
9. Clarke, M., Kurinczuk, J.J. Health services research: a case of need or special pleading? British Medical Journal 1992; 304: 1675-1676.
10. Department of Health. Research for Health:An R&D strategy for the NHS. London: HMSO, 1991.
11. Department of Health for NHS ME Research and Development Directorate. Report of the NHS R&D Information Systems Strategy Study. London: Department of Health, 1992.
12. Department of Health Advisory Group on Health Technology Assessment. Assessing the Effects of Health Technologies. London: Department of Health, 1992.
13. Department of Health. Research for Health. London: HMSO, 1993.
14. Department of Health. Report of the Taskforce on the Strategy for Research in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. Leeds: Department of Health, 1993.
15. Read, S. The strategy for research in nursing and England: initial impact. Nurse Researcher 1994; 1: 3, 72-84.
16. Department of Health. Managing the New NHS. London: Department of Health, 1993.
17. NHS Executive. Research and Development in the New NHS: Functions and responsibilities. London: Department of Health, 1994.
18. McMahon, A. Implications for nursing of the NHS R&D funding policy. Nursing Standard 1997; 11:28, 44-48.
19. Scott, E. Research and development in nursing. Nursing Times 1997; 93: 36, 32-33.
20. Mead, D., Moseley, L., Cook, R. The performance of nursing in the research stakes: Lessons from the field. Nursing Times Research 1997; 2:5, 335-344.
21. Wisely, J., Haines, A. Primary/Secondary Care Interface: Three-year programme report. London: Department of Health, 1997.
22. Akehurst, R., Jones, D., Brooker, C.et al. An Integrated Strategy for Nursing and Midwifery Research. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, 1995.
23. Stevens, J. Improving integration between research and practice as a means of developing evidence-based health care. Nursing Times Research 1997; 2:1, 7-15.
24. Task force on R&D in the NHS. Supporting Research and Development in the NHS. (Culyer, AJ. (chair)). London: HMSO, 1994.
25. Davies, S. Research and development: How nurses can take a central role. Nursing Times Research 1997; 2:1, 28-29.