Quality and quantity in research policy for nursing

Journal of Research in Nursing

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 16-27

  Rafferty, Anne Marie ^a   Traynor, Michael ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Nursing; Policy; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346214129     PISSN: 17449871     EISSN: 1744988X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/136140969700200104     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Webster, C. Nursing and the early crisis of the National Health Service. Bulletin of the History of Nursing Group 1985; 7: 4-12.
2. Ministry of Health, Department of Health for Scotland, Ministry of Labour and National Service. Working Party on the Recruitment and Training of Nurses. Minority Report. London: HMSO, 1948.
3. Department of Health. Research for Health. A research and development strategy for the NHS. London: HMSO, 1991.
4. Austoker, J., Bryder, L. (eds). Historical Perspectives on the Role of the MRC. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
5. Ministry of Health, Scottish Home and Health Department. Report of the Committee on Senior Nursing Staff Structure. London: HMSO, 1966.
6. Griffiths, R. Report of the Management Inquiry. London: DHSS, 1983.
7. Department of Health. Report of the Taskforce on a Strategy For Research in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. London: HMSO, 1992.
8. Traynor, M., Rafferty, A.M. The NHS R&D Context for Nursing Research: A working paper London: School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Policy in Nursing Research, 1997.
9. Institute for Health Services. Research Career Profiles of Researchers in Health and Social Care. Final report to the National Health Service Executive co-ordinated initiative on research workforce capacity. Part 4. Luton, Beds: University of Luton, 1995.
10. Putnam, R.Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R. Making Democracy Work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1993.
11. Lewis, J.Ritchie, J. Advancing research: Research workforce capacity in health and social care. London: Social and Community Planning Research, 1995, p 83.
12. DoH. Medical Research and the NHS Reforms. Government response to the Third Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: 1994-95 session. London: HMSO, 1995. Cmnd. 2984.
13. Department of Health. Supporting Research and Development in the NHS: A declaration of NHS activity and costs associated with research and development: Initital guidance. London: HMSO, 1995.
14. Nicholson, L., (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1990.
15. Foucault, M. Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Gordon, C. (ed). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1980; 78-108.
16. Jordanova, L. Sexual Visions. Images of gender in science and medicine between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989.
17. Lather, P. Getting Smart. Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. London: Routledge, 1991.
18. Said, E. Culture and Imperialism. The world, the text and the critic. London: Chatto and Windus, 1993.
19. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. Medical Research and the NHS Reforms. Third Report Session 1994-5. London: HMSO, 1995.
20. Swales, J. Research Capacity Strategy for the Department of Health and the NHS. A first statement London: Department of Health, 1996.
21. Rafferty, A.M. The Politics of Nursing Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1996, p 181.