Visualization of nuclear spin-spin coupling pathways by real-space functions

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 42, Issue 36, 2003, Pages 4335-4338

  Malkina, Olga L ^a   Malkin, Vladimir G ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Ab initio calculations; Density functional calculations; NMR spectroscopy; Spin spin coupling

Indexed keywords

COUPLINGS; HYDROGEN BONDS; YARN;

COUPLING PATHWAYS;

NUCLEAR PHYSICS;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITY; ELECTRON; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PARAMETER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0141869038     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200351713     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. D. R. Davis, R. P. Lutz, J. D. Roberts, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 246; M. Barfield, M. Karplus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 1.
2. D. R. Davis, R. P. Lutz, J. D. Roberts, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 246; M. Barfield, M. Karplus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 1.
3. R. H. Contreras, J. E. Peralta, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2000, 37, 321, and references therein.
4. a) A. J. Dingley, S. J. Grzesiek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8293;
5. b) G. Gemmecker, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 1276; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1224, and references therein;
6. b) G. Gemmecker, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 1276; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1224, and references therein;
7. c) A. Bagno, G. Saielli, G. Scorrano, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2600; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2532.
8. c) A. Bagno, G. Saielli, G. Scorrano, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2600; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2532.
9. a) S. A. Perera, M. Nooijen, R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 3290:
10. b) V. G. Malkin, O. L. Malkina, L. A. Eriksson, D. R. Salahub in Modern Density Functional Theory: A Tool for Chemistry; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Vol. 2 (Eds.: J. M. Seminario, P. Politzer), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995.
11. S. J. Wilkens, W. M. Westler, J. L. Markley, F. Weinhold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12026.
12. a) J. Khandogin, T. Ziegler, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 1999, 55, 607;
13. b) J. Autschbach, T. Ziegler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5320.
14. H. Benedict, I. G. Shenderovich, O. L. Malkina, V. G. Malkin, G. S, Denisov, N. S. Golubev, H,-H. Limbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1979.
15. A. L. Esteban, M, P. Galache, E Mora, E, Diez, J. Casanueva, J. San Fabian, V. Barone, J. E. Peralta, R. H. Contrearas, J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 5298.
16. Usually only the dominant Fermi-contact term is analyzed. We will follow this line throughout the paper, though all other important terms can be visualized along the same lines.
17. Probably the first attempt to visualize chemical-shift density (as an example of a property density) was made by C. J. Jameson, A. D. Buckingham, J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 73, 5684.
18. 11 are unperturbed, single-perturbed (by the first and second perturbations), and bilinear-perturbed wavefunctions, respectively. The corresponding double-perturbed density matrix is easily available in DFPT.
19. J. Kowalewski, A. Laaksonen, B. Roos, P. Siegbahn, J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 2896.
20. R. H. Contreras, J. E. Peralta, M. C. Ruiz de Azúa, C. G. Giribet, J. C. Facelli, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2000, 41, 55.
21. -2 au to avoid numerical noise in the calculations.
22. CED might also be implemented in a coupled perturbed scheme or via response theory. We decided to use a DFPT approach for ease of implementation, and to simultaneously obtain the double-perturbed density.
23. [16b]
24. a) HERMIT is the integral package of Dalton, a molecular electronic structure program, Release 1.2 (2001), written by T. Helgaker, H. J. A. Jensen, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, K. Ruud, H. Ågren, A. A. Auer, K. L. Bak, V. Bakken, O. Christiansen, S. Coriani, P. Dahle, E. K. Dalskov, T. Enevoldsen, B. Fernandez, C. Hättig, K. Hald, A. Halkier, H. Heiberg, H. Hettema, D. Jonsson, S. Kirpekar, R. Kobayashi, H. Koch, K. V. Mikkelsen, P. Norman, M. J. Packer, T. B. Pedersen, T. A. Ruden, A. Sanchez, T. Saue, S. P. A. Sauer, B. Schimmelpfennig, K. O. Sylvester-Hvid, P. R. Taylor, O. Vahtras
25. b) D. R. Salahub, R. Fournier, P. Mlynarsky, I. Papai, A. St-Amant, J. Ushio in Density Functional Methods in Chemistry (Eds.: J. Labanowsky, J. Andzelm), Springer, New York, 1991.
26. [17d] a) J. P. Perdew, Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8800
27. b) J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822; J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 1986, 34, 7406
28. b) J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822; J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 1986, 34, 7406
29. ; c) W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer, M. Schindler in NMR-Basic Principles and Progress, Vol. 23 (Eds.: P. Diehl, E. Fluck, H. Günther, R. Kosfeld, J. Seelig), Springer, Heidelberg, 1990, p. 165
30. d) MOLEKEL 4.0, P. Flükiger, H. P. Lüthi, S. Portmann, J. Weber, Swiss Center for Scientific Computing, Manno, Switzerland, 2000.
31. O. L. Malkina, R. Reviakine, M. Kaupp, V. G. Malkin, unpublished results.
32. H. Günther, NMR Spectroscopy. An Introduction, Wiley, New York, 1980.
33. The CED coupling (calculated by integration) is equal to 7.4 Hz, which is in good agreement with the experimental value of 7.5 Hz (see D. L. Beveridge in Semiempirical Methods of Electronic Structure Calculations (Ed.: G. A. Segal), Plenum, New York, 1977, p. 163).
34. A. Soncini, P. Lazzeretti, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 7165.
35. See footnote [**].