Comparison of antibody functionality using different immobilization methods

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 215-223

  Danczyk, R ^a   Krieder, B ^a   North, A ^a   Webster, T ^a   HogenEsch, H ^a   Rundell, A ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibody; Antigen capture; Biosensor; Protein A; Protein immobilization

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS; CROSSLINKING;

ANTIBODY FUNCTIONALITY;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

AMINOSILANE; N GAMMA MALEIMIDOBUTYRYLOXYSUCCINIMIDE ESTER; PROTEIN A; SILANE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ANTIBODY IMMOBILIZATION; ANTIGEN BINDING; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; IMMOBILIZATION; PROTEIN IMMOBILIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY REACTIONS; ANTIGENS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DINITROPHENOLS; GLASS; HAPTENS; IMMUNOASSAY; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; MICE; MICROSPHERES; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; PROPYLAMINES; PROTEIN BINDING; SILANES; STAPHYLOCOCCAL PROTEIN A; SUCCINIMIDES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0141839661     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10760     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ahluwalia A, DeRossi D, Ristori C, Schirone A, Serra C. 1991. A comparative study of protein immobilization techniques for optical immunosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 7:207-214.
2. Anderson GP, Jacoby MA, Ligler FS, King KD. 1997. Effectiveness of protein A for antibody immobilization for a fiber optic biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 12:329-336.
3. Aslam M, Dent A. 1998. Bioconjugation: protein coupling techniques for the biomedical sciences. New York: Grove's Dictionaries. p 505-569.
4. Babacan S, Pivarnik P, Letcher S, Rand AG. 2000. Evaluation of antibody immobilization methods for piezoelectric biosensor application. Biosens Bioelectron 15:615-621.
5. Bhatia SK, Teixeira JL, Anderson M, Shriver-Lake LC, Calvert JM, Georger JH, Hickman JJ, Dulcey CS, Schoen PE, Ligler FS. 1993. Fabrication of surfaces resistant to protein adsorption and application to two-dimensional protein patterning. Anal Biochem 208:197-205.
6. Danczyk R. 2003. Preparation, characterization, and functionality of immuno-surfaces for biosensor applications. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
7. König B, Grätzel M. 1994. A novel immunosensor for herpes virus. Anal Chem 66:341-344.
8. Kouvroukoglou S, Dee KC, Bizios R, McIntire LV, Zygourakis K. 2000. Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. Biomaterials 21:1725-1733.
9. Lu B, Smyth MR, O'Kennedy R. 1996. Oriented immobilization of antibodies and its applications in immunoassays and immunosensors. Analyst 121:29R-32R.
10. Mishell BB, Shiigi S. 1980. Selected methods in cellular immunology. New York: Freeman. p 347-349.
11. Nice E, Catimel B. 1999. Instrumental biosensors: new perspectives for the analysis of biomolecular interactions. BioEssays 21:339-352.
12. Olbrich KC, Andersen T, Blumenstock FA, Bizios R. 1996. Surfaces modified with covalently-immobilized adhesive peptides affect fibroblast population motility. Biomaterials 17:759-764.
13. Pancrazio JJ, Whelan JP, Borkholder DA, Ma W, Stenger DA. 1999. Development and application of cell-based biosensors. Ann Biomed Eng 27:697-711.
14. Shriver-Lake LC, Donner B, Edelstein R, Breslin K, Bhatia SK, Ligler FS. 1997. Antibody immobilization using heterobifunctional crosslinkers. Biosens Bioelectron 12:1101-1106.
15. Turkova J. 1999. Oriented immobilization of biologically active proteins as a tool for revealing protein interactions and function. J Chromatogr B 722:11-31.
16. Zull JE, Reed-Mundell J, Lee YW, Vezenov D, Ziats NP, Anderson JM, Sukenik CN. 1994. Problems and approaches in covalent attachment of peptides and proteins to inorganic surfaces for biosensor applications. J Indust Microbiol 13:137-143.