Reliability of hydraulic performance and cost estimates of barrier-supported pump-and-treat systems in heterogeneous aquifers

IAHS-AISH Publication

Volumn , Issue 277, 2002, Pages 331-338

  Bayer, P ^a   Finkel, M ^a   Teutsch, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Advective control; Capture zone; Cost estimation; Hydraulic barrier; Pump and treat; Reliability

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

HYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE;

GROUNDWATER;

AQUIFER POLLUTION; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PUMP AND TREAT; REMEDIATION;

EID: 0141837227     PISSN: 01447815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P. & Heidari, M. (1994) Applications of optimal hydraulic control to ground-water sytems. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. ASCE 120(3), 350-365.
2. Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M & Pinder, G. F. (1987) Combining physical containment with optimal withdrawal for contaminated groundwater remediation. Adv. Water Resour. 10(4), 200-204.
3. Bayer, P. (1999) Kostenanalyse innovativer Pump-and-Treat Konzepte (Cost analysis of innovative pump-and-treat systems). Diploma Thesis, Center for Applied Geoscience, University of Tuebingen, Germany.
4. Deutsch, C. V. & Journel, A. G. ( 1992) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
5. Franzetti, S. & Guadagnini, A. (1996) Probabilistic estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers. J. Hydrol. 174, 149-171.
6. Huang, C. & Mayer, A. S. (1997) Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables. Water Resour. Res. 33(5), 1001-1012.
7. Javandel, I. & Tsang, C. F. (1986) Capture-zone type curves: a tool for aquifer cleanup, Groundwater 24(5), 616-625.
8. Mansfield, C. M. & Shoemaker, C. A. (1999) Optimal remediation of unconfined aquifers: numerical applications and derivative calculations. Water Resour. Res. 35(5), 1455-1469.
9. McDonald, M.G. & Harbaugh A. W. (1988) A modular three-dimensional, finite difference ground-water flow model. In: US Geol. Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1. Washington DC, USA.
10. Poeter, E. & Townsend, P. (1994) Assessment of critical flow path for improved remediation management. Groundwater 32(3), 439-447.
11. Pollock, D. W. (1994) User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the US Geol. Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. US Geol. Survey Open-File Report 94-464.
12. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A. & Vetterling, W. T. (1990) Numerical Recipes-The Art of Scientific Computing (Second edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, UK.
13. Ranjithan, S., Eheart, J. W. & Garret, J.H. (1993) Neural network-based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 29(3), 563-574.
14. Van Leeuwen, M., Te stroet, C. B. M., Butler A. P. & Tompkins, J. A. (1998) Stochastic determination of well capture zones. Water Resour. Res. 34(9), 2215-2223.
15. Zheng, C. & Wang, P. P. (1999) An integrated global and local optimization approach for remediation system design. Water Resour. Res. 35(1), 137-148.