Towards efficient guidelines: How to monitor guideline use in primary care

Health Technology Assessment

Volumn 7, Issue 18, 2003, Pages

  Hutchinson, A ^a   McIntosh, A ^a   Cox, S ^a   Gilbert, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; AWARENESS; CASE STUDY; COMMUNITY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFIDENTIALITY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MODEL; MONITORING; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NURSE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZATION; RELIABILITY; SKILL; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0141829316     PISSN: 13665278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3310/hta7180     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Eccles M, Mason J. How to develop cost-conscious guidelines. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(16).
2. NHS Executive. Information for Health an Information Strategy for the Modern NHS 1998-2005. A National Strategy for Local Implementation. London: Department of Health, NHS Executive; 1998.
3. Department of Health. The New NHS Modern, Dependable. Cmnd 3807. London: The Stationery Office; 1997.
4. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investing, A Plan for Reform. Cmnd 4818-I. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
5. Royal College of General Practitioners. The quality initiative - Summary of council meeting. J R Coll Gen Pract 1983;33:523-4.
6. Royal College of General Practitioners. Quality in General Practice. Policy Statement 2. London: RCGP; 1985.
7. Department of Health and Social Security. Primary Health Care. An Agenda for Discussion. Cmnd 9771. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1986.
8. Department of Health. Working for Patients. Cmnd 555. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1989.
9. NHS Executive. Clinical Effectiveness Resource Pack. London: NHS Executive; 1997.
10. Royal College of General Practitioners. The Development and Implementation of Clinical Guidelines. Report of the Clinical Guidelines Working Group. Report No. 26. London: RCGP; 1995.
11. Department of Health. A First Class Service. Quality in the New NHS. London: Department of Health; 1998.
12. Mulrow CD. Systematic reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:597-9.
13. Ketley D, Woods KL. Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: Example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1993;322:891-4.
14. Grimshaw JM, Hutchinson A. Clinical practice guidelines - Do they enhance value for money in health care? Br Med Bull 1995;51:927-40.
15. Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Freemantle N, Harvey EL Audit and feedback to improve health professional practice and health care outcomes (Part 1). The Cochrane Library 1998; Issue 4.
16. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Evaluate Quality of Care. Vol. 2: Methods. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publication No. 95-0046. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Services; 1995.
17. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Evaluate Quality of Care. Vol. 1: Issues. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publication No. 95-0045. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Services; 1995.
18. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:358-64.
19. Hearnshaw HM, Harker RM, Cheater FM, Baker RH, Grimshaw GM. Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health quality. Qual Health Care 2001;10:173-8.
20. Palmer RH, Banks NJ. Overview of the Translation Methodology in Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Evaluate Quality of Care. Vol. 2: Methods. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publication No. 95-0046: 3-29. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Services; 1995.
21. NHS Executive. The National Plan for the New NHS: The Need for Change. London: Department of Health, NHS Executive; 2000.
22. McColl A, Roderick P, Gabbay J, Smith H, Moore M. Performance indicators for primary care groups: An evidence-based approach. BMJ 1998;317:1354-60.
23. Wilkinson EK, McColl A, Exworthy M, Roderick P, Smith H, Moore M, Gabbay J. Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: A qualitative study. Qual Health Care 2000;9:166-74.
24. Hadorn DC, Baker DW, Kamberg CJ, Brook RH. Practice guidelines. Phase II of the AHCPR-sponsored heart failure guideline: Translating practice recommendations into review criteria. Journal on Quality Improvement 1996;22:265-76.
25. Baker R, Fraser RC. Development of review criteria: Linking guidelines and assessment of quality. BMJ 1995;311:370-3.
26. The North of England study of standards and performance in general practice. Medical audit in general practice. II: Effects on health of patients with common childhood conditions. BMJ 1992;304:1484-8.
27. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Shekelle PG, Cantrill JA, Buetow SA, Cragg DK. Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice. Qual Health Care 1999;8:6-15.
28. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, Durie A, Thapar A, Roland MO. Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: Validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes. Qual Safe Health Care 2002;11:125-30.
29. Rolfe MK. The NEBPINY programme (Phase 1). Changing practice - Testing a facilitated evidence-based programme in primary care. Journal of Clinical Governance 2001;9:21-6.
30. McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Home PD, Brown F, Dammerell A, Davis R, et al. Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Review for Type 2 Diabetes: Management of Blood Glucose. Sheffield: ScHARR, University of Sheffield; 2002.
31. Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Field R, Gilbert C, Anderson J. Clinical Practice Evaluation Programme. Sheffield: University of Sheffield; 2001.
32. Hutchinson A, McColl E, Christie M, Riccalton C. Health Outcome Measures in Primary and Outpatient Care. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic; 1996.
33. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, König-Zahn C. Cross Cultural Health Outcome Assessment; A User's Guide. Amsterdam: Groningen University; 1997.
34. Garratt AM, Hutchinson A, Russell I. The UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK): Reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:907-15.
35. Garratt AM, Hutchinson A, Russell I. Patient-assessed measure of health outcome in asthma: A comparison of four approaches. Respir Med 2000;94:597-606.
36. Hutchinson A, Fisher P. Defining Minimum Data Sets for Ambulatory Care - Models and Case Studies. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities; McACE Consortium; 1990.
37. McNamee P, Hutchinson A, Parkin D, Milne E, Steen N. Out-patient case mix: A survey of user requirements. Journal of Management in Medicine 1994;8:29-37.
38. Irvine D, Irvine S. Making Sense of Audit. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1997.
39. Russell I, Grimshaw J, Wilson B. Scientific and methodological issues in quality assurance. Proc R Soc Edin 1993;101B:77-103.
40. Barton A, Thomson R, Bhopal R. Clinical audit: More research is required [editorial]. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:445-7.
41. Barnes R, Hansed K. Check-up time. Health Service Journal 1998;21 May:26-7.
42. Hu TW, Stotts NA, Fogarty TE, Bergstrom N. Cost analysis for guideline implementation in prevention and early treatment of pressure ulcers. Decubitus 1993;6:42-6.
43. AHCPR. Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults. Pressure Ulcer in Adults: Prediction and Prevention. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 3. AHCPR Publication No. 92-0047. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.
44. Grant JA, Napier A, Stephen S, Fairfield G, Campbell L, Griffin E. Integrating audit into primary care: A Tayside initiative. Health Bull 1998;56:822-7.
45. Earnshaw JJ. Auditing cost: The cost of the emperor's new clothes. Br J Hosp Med 1997;58:189-92.
46. Johnson DS, Faux JC. The hidden cost of audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997;79:12-14.
47. Robinson MB, Thompson E, Black N. Why is evaluation of the cost effectiveness of audit so difficult? The example of thrombolysis for suspected myocardial infarction. Qual Health Care 1998;7:19-26.
48. Emberton M, Neal DE, Black N, Harrison M, Fordham M, et al. The feasibility and cost of a large multi-centre audit of process and outcome of prostatectomy. Qual Health Care 1995;4:256-62.
49. Tunbridge FKE, Millar JP, Schofield PJ, Spencer JA, Young G, Home PD. Diabetes care in general practice: An approach to audit of process and outcome. Br J Gen Pract 1993;43:291-5.
50. Wilson T, Holt T. Complexity and clinical care. BMJ 2001;323:685-8.
51. British Thoracic Society. Guidelines on the management of asthma. Thorax 1993;48 (Suppl):S1-24.
52. Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG). Epidemiology Review: The Epidemiology and Cost of Back Pain. London: HMSO; 1994.
53. Eccles M, et al. North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project. The Primary Care Management of Stable Angina. Report No. 98. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research; 1999.
54. Eccles M, et al. North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project. The Primary Care Management of Asthma in Adults. Report No. 97. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research; 1999.
55. Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Waddell G, Feder G, Breen A, Burton K, et al. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.
56. Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Feder G, Lewis M. Low Back Pain Evidence Review. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.
57. Steen N, Hutchinson A, McColl E, Eccles MP, Hewison J, Meadows KA, et al. Development of a symptom based outcome measure for asthma. BMJ 1994;309:1065-8.
58. Charmaz K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2000.
59. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 173-94.
60. Moser CA, Kalton G. Survey Methods in Social Investigation. 2nd ed. London: Gower; 1979.
61. Lough JRM, Willmott M, Murray TS. Supporting practice-based audit: A price to be paid for collecting data. Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:793-5.
62. Kernick D. Costing interventions in primary care. Fam Pract 2000;17:66-70.
63. Eve R, Hodgkin P, Waller J, Dixon S. Consultations in General Practice. What Do They Cost? The Practice Data Comparison Project. Sheffield: Centre for Innovation in Primary Care; 1999.
64. NHS Executive. Collection of Health Data from General Practice: Plans for the Pilot Stage. London: Department of Health, NHS Executive; 1997.
65. Department of Health. An Organisation with a Memory. Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.