Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice

Quality in Health Care

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 6-15

  Campbell, S M ^a   Roland, M O ^a   Shekelle, P G ^b   Cantrill, J A ^a   Buetow, S A ^a   Cragg, D K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

General practice; Quality; Review criteria

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL CARE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE;

EID: 0032938946     PISSN: 09638172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Grol R Development of guidelines for general practice care Br J Gen Pract 1993,43:146-51.
2. Forrest D, Hoskins A, Hussey H. Clinical guidelines and their implementation. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:19-22.
3. Thomson R, Lavender M, Madhok R. How to ensure that guidelines are effective. BMJ 1995,311:237-42.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations Lancet 1993;342:1317-20
5. Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development. BMJ 1996;312:760-2
6. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines: guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 1992.
7. Majeed FA, Voss S. Performance indicators for general practice: will lead to league tables of performance. BMJ 1995;311 209-10.
8. Radical Statistics Health Group. NHS indicators of success: what do they tell us? BMJ 1995,310:1045-50.
9. Anderson BG, Noyce JA. Clinical indicators and their role in quality management. Aust Clin Rev 1992;12 15-21.
10. Angaran DM. Selecting, developing and evaluating indicators. Am J Hosp Pharmacol 1991;48:1931-7.
11. Baker R, Fraser RC. Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality BMJ 1995;311:370-3.
12. Using clinical practice guidelines to evaluate quality of care. Vol 2 Methods. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1995.
13. Kosecoff J, Fink A, Brook RH, et al. The appropriateness of using a medical procedure: is information in the medical record valid? Med Care 1987,25:196-201.
14. Kahn KL, Rogers WH, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA 1990,264:1969-73.
15. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, et al. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986;2:53-63.
16. Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, Leape LL,et. Measuring the necessity of medical procedures. Med Care 1994;32:357-65.
17. Kahan JP, Park RE, Leape LL, et al. Variations by speciality in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med Care 1996;34:512-23.
18. Gray D, Hampton JR, Bernstein SJ, et al. Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgery. Lancet 1990;335 1317-20.
19. Scott EA, Black N. Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom: a consensus panel approach. Gut 1991;32:1066-70.
20. Centre for Health Services Research The primary care management of asthma in adults. North of England evidence based guideline development project. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, 1996.
21. BMJ Evidence based clinical guidelines. The primary care management of asthma in adults. North of England evidence based guideline development project http://www.bmj.com/bmj/ asthma/ast01.htm
22. The British guidelines on asthma management 1995: review and position statement. Thorax 1997;52:S1-21
23. The primary care management of stable angina. North of England evidence based guideline development project. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, 1996.
24. BMJ. Evidence based clinical guidelines. The primary care management of stable angma, North of England evidence based guideline development project. http://www.bmj.com/bmj/ angina/ang01.htm
25. American Diabetic Association. Clinical practice recommendations 1997 Diabetes Care 1997;20:S1-70
26. Saint Vincent and improving diabetes care. Specialist UK Workgroup Reports. Diabetic Medicine 1996;13:S1-128.
27. Shekelle PG, Kahan JP, Bernstein SJ, et al. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of procedures N Engl J Med 1998;338:1888-95
28. Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand ST, et al Rating the appropriateness of coronary arteriography: do practising physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med 1998;338:1896-904.
29. Naylor D. What is appropriate care [editorial]? N Engl J Med 1988;338:1918-20
30. Kravitz RL, Laouri M, Kahan JP, et al. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. JAMA 1995;274 632-8.
31. Selby JV, Pireman BH, Lundstrom RJ, et al. Variation among hospitals in coronary angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organisation. N Engl J Med 1996;328.1888-96.
32. Shekelle PG, Chassin MR, Park RE. Evidence for the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method: criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (in press).
33. Hicks NR. Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care. BMJ 1994;309:730-3.
34. Charlton BG. Practice guidelines and practical judgement: the role of mega-trials, meta-analyses, and consensus. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44:290-1.
35. Mulholland AV, Wheeler SG, Heieck JJ. Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technique, N Engl J Med 1973; 288:1272-5.