Predicting protein quaternary structure by pseudo amino acid composition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 282-289

  Chou, Kuo Chen ^a,d   Cai, Yu Dong ^b,c  

^a Tianjin Inst Bioinfo Drug Discov   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Gordon Life Science Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Covariant discriminant algorithm; Homo oligomerization; Proteomics; Quasi sequence order effects; Quaternary attribute

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOINFORMATICS; CALCULATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COVARIANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OLIGOMERIZATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

HOMO;

EID: 0141815538     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10500     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Klotz IM, Darnell DW, Langerman NR. Quaternary structure of proteins. In: Neurath H, Hill RL, editors. The proteins. 3rd edition, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press; 1975. p 226-241.
2. Einstein E, Schachman HK. Determing the roles of subunits in protein function. In: Creighton TE, editor. Protein function: A practical approach. London: IRL Press; 1989. p 135-176.
3. Chen Z, Alcayaga C, Suarez-Isla BA, O'Rourke B, Tomaselli G, Marban E. A "minimal" sodium channel construct consisting of ligated S5-P-S6 segments forms a toxin-activatable ionophore. J Biol Chem 2002;277:24653-24658.
4. Doyle DA, Morais CJ, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: Molecular basis of K plus conduction and selectivity. Science 1998;280:69-77.
5. Brejc K, van Dijk WJ, Klaassen RV, Schuurmans M, van der Oost J, Smit AB, Sixma TK. Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors. Nature 2001;411:269-276.
6. Tretter V, Ehya N, Fuchs K, Sieghart W. Stoichiometry and assembly of a recombinant GABAA receptor subtype. J Neurosci 1997;17:2728-2737.
7. Matthews BW, Bernhard SA. Structure and symmetry in oligomeric proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1973;6:257-317.
8. Caspar DLD, Klug A. Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harb Sym 1962;27:1-24.
9. Harrison SC, Jack A. Structure of tomato bushy stunt virus: Three-dimensional X-ray diffraction analysis at 16 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1975;97:173-191.
10. Chou KC. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino-acid-composition. Proteins 2001;43:246-255. (Erratum: Proteins 2001;44:60)
11. Nakashima H, Nishikawa K, Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J Biochem 1986;99:152-162.
12. Chou PY. Prediction of protein structural classes from amino acid composition. In: Fasman GD, editor. Prediction of protein structure and the principles of protein conformation. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. p 549-586.
13. Chou KC, Zhang CT. Predicting protein folding types by distance functions that make allowances for amino acid interactions. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:22014-22020.
14. Chou KC. A novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20-1)-D amino acid composition space. Proteins 1995;21:319-344.
15. Zhou GP. An intriguing controversy over protein structural class prediction. J Protein Chem 1998;17:729-738.
16. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Jernigan RL, Erman B. Understanding the recognition of protein structural classes by amino acid composition. Proteins 1997;29:172-185.
17. Krigbaum WR, Knutton SP. Prediction of the amount of secondary structure in a globular protein from its amino acid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:2809-2813.
18. Muskal SM, Kim S.-H. Predicting protein secondary structure content: A tandem neural network approach. J Mol Biol 1992;225:713-727.
19. Zhang CT, Zhang Z, He Z. Prediction of the secondary structure content of globular proteins based on structural classes. J Protein Chem 1996;15:775-86.
20. Liu W, Chou KC. Protein secondary structural content prediction. Protein Eng 1999;12:1041-1050.
21. Nakashima H, Nishikawa K. Discrimination of intracellular and extracellular proteins using amino acid composition and residue-pair frequencies. J Mol Biol 1994;238:54-61.
22. Cedano J, Aloy P, Pérez-Pons JA, Querol E. Relation between amino acid composition and cellular location of proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;266:594-600.
23. Reinhardt A, Hubbard T. Using neural networks for prediction of the subcellular location of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:2230-2236.
24. Chou KC, Elrod DW. Protein subcellular location prediction. Protein Eng 1999;12:107-118.
25. Zhou GP, Doctor K. Subcellular location prediction of apoptosis proteins. Proteins 2003;50:44-48.
26. Chou KC, Elrod DW. Bioinformatical analysis of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Proteome Res 2002;1:429-433.
27. Tanford C. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to the stability of the globular conformation of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1962;84:4240-4274.
28. Hopp TP, Woods KR. Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:3824-3828.
29. Schneider G, Wrede P. The rational design of amino acid sequences by artificial neural networks and simulated molecular evolution: De novo design of an idealized leader peptidase cleavage site. Biophys J 1994;66:335-344.
30. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its Supplement TrEMBL. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;25:31-36.
31. Chou KC, Zhang CT. Review: Prediction of protein structural classes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1995;30:275-349.
32. Zhou GP, Assa-Munt N. Some insights into, protein structural class prediction. Proteins 2001;44:57-59.
33. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press; 1979. p 322, 381.
34. Chou KC. A key driving force in determination of protein structural classes. Biochem Biophys Res Com 1999;264:216-224.
35. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.