Assessment of vasoreactivity using videodensitometry coronary angiography

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 271-279

  Molloi, Sabee ^a,b,c   Berenji, Gholam R ^a   Dang, Trien T ^a   Kassab, Ghassan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary disease and quantitative coronary angiography; Vasoreactivity; Videodensitometry

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL FUNCTION; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; BLOOD VESSEL REACTIVITY; BLOOD VOLUME; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRUG EFFECT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWINE; VIDEODENSITOMETRY;

EID: 0141794082     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 18758312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025412203223     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation 2000; 101(16): 1899-1906.
2. Schachinger V, Zeiher AM. Quantitative assessment of coronary vasoreactivity in humans in vivo. Importance of baseline vasomotor tone in atherosclerosis. Circulation 1995; 92(8): 2087-2094.
3. Anderson TJ, Meredith IT, Charbonneau F, et al. Nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilation is not enhanced in patients with impaired endothelium-dependent dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28(3): 580-584.
4. El-Tamimi H, Mansour M, Wargovich TJ, et al. Constrictor and dilator responses to intracoronary acetylchlorine in adjacent segments of the same coronary artery in patients with coronary artery disease. Endothelial function revisited. Circulation 1994; 89(1): 45-51.
5. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlager H, Just H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans. Progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1991; 83(2): 391-401.
6. Von Birgelen C, Slager CJ, Di Mario C, De Feyter PJ, Serruys PW. Volumetric intracoronary ultrasound: A new maximum confidence approach for the quantitative assessment of progression-regression of atherosclerosis? Atherosclerosis 1995; 118 (Suppl): S103-S113.
7. Von Birgelen C, De Vrey EA, Mintz GS, et al. ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: Feasibility and reproducibility of the automated analysis of coronary lumen and atherosclerotic plaque dimensions in humans. Circulation 1997; 96(9): 2944-2952.
8. Peters RJ, Kok WE, Pasterkamp G, Von Birgelen C, Prins M, Serruys PW. Videodensitometric quantitative angiography after coronary balloon angioplasty, compared to edge-detection quantitative angiography and intracoronary ultrasound imaging. Eur Heart J 2000; 21(8): 654-661.
9. Haase J, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, et al. Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography. Eur Heart J 1995; 16(1): 112-119.
10. Di Mario C, Gorge G, Peters R, et al. Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound. Study Group on Intracoronary Imaging of the Working Group of Coronary Circulation and of the Subgroup on Intravascular Ultrasound of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1998; 19(2): 207-229.
11. Fencil LE, Doi K, Hoffman KR. Accurate analysis of blood vessel sizes and stenotic lesions using stereoscopic DSA system. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 33-41.
12. Ersahin A, Molloi S, Yao-Jin Q. A digital filtration technique for scatter-glare correction based on thickness estimation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995; 14: 587-595.
13. Molloi SY, Mistretta CA. Quantification techniques for dual-energy cardiac imaging. Med Phys 1989; 16(2): 209-217.
14. Molloi S, Ersahin A, Hicks J, Wallis J. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Int J Card Imaging 1995; 11(4): 223-231.
15. Molloi S, Kassab GS, Zhou Y. Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: In vivo validation. Circulation 2001; 104(19): 2351-2357.
16. Kassab GS, Molloi S. Cross-sectional area and volume compliance of porcine left coronary arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 281(2): H623-H628.
17. Molloi S, Zhou Y, Wamsely G. Scatter-glare estimation for digital radiographic systems: Comparison of digital filtration and sampling techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17(6): 881-888.
18. Molloi S, Bednarz G, Tang J, Zhou Y, Mathur T. Absolute volumetric coronary blood flow measurement with digital subtraction angiography. Int J Card Imaging 1998; 14(3): 137-145.
19. Molloi SY, Ersahin A, Roeck WW, Nalcioglu O. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA. Invest Radiol 1991; 26(2): 119-127.
20. Zhou Y, Kassab GS, Molloi S. In vivo validation of the design rules of the coronary arteries and their application in the assessment of diffuse disease. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47(6): 977-993.
21. Hoffmann KR, Wahle A, Pellot-Barakat C, Sklansky J, Sonka M. Biplane X-ray angiograms, intravascular ultrasound, and 3D visualization of coronary vessels. Int J Card Imaging 1999; 15(6): 495-512.
22. Klein JL, Hoff JG, Peifer JW, et al. A quantitative evaluation of the three dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging 1998; 14(2): 75-87.
23. Doriot PA, Guggenheim N, Dorsaz PA, Rutishauser W. Morphometric versus densitometric assessment of coronary vasomotor tone - An overview. Eur Heart J 1989; 10 (Suppl F): 49-53.
24. Nichols AB, Gabrieli CFO, Fenoglio JJ, Esser PD. Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary angiograms. Circulation 1984; 69: 512-522.
25. Theron HD, Lambert CR, Pepine CJ. Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66(17): 1186-1190.
26. Zhou Y. Quantitative Assessment of Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Using Digital Angiography. Irvine: University of California; 2000.
27. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Basic structure-function relations of the coronary vascular tree. The basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992; 85: 1987-2003.
28. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 783-797.
29. Molloi S, Zhang W, Leung C, Hiro T, Hicks J. Measurement of a cross-sectional area of normal and stenotic arteries with videodensitometric quantitative arteriography and intravascular ultrasound. Acad Radiol 1997; 4(4): 245-252.
30. Molloi S, Ersahin A, Tang J, Hicks J, Leung CY. Quantification of volumetric coronary blood flow with dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Circulation 1996; 93(10): 1919-1927.
31. Celermajer DS. Endothelial dysfunction: Does it matter? Is it reversible? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30(2): 325-333.