Absolute volumetric coronary blood flow measurement with digital subtraction angiography

International Journal of Cardiac Imaging

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 137-145

  Molloi, Sabee ^a   Bednarz, Greg ^a   Tang, Jerry ^a   Zhou, Yifang ^a   Mathur, Tarun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Blood flow; Cardiac imaging; Coronary disease; Videodensitometry

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; NONHUMAN; SWINE; VOLUMETRY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANIMALS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CALIBRATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SWINE;

EID: 0031737872     PISSN: 01679899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006059709539     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Hawthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976; 53(4): 627-632.
2. Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, de Soyza N. Coronary angiogram interpretation: interobserver variability. JAMA 1978; 240: 2053-2056.
3. Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J, et al. reproducibility of coronary angiographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1982; 8: 656-675.
4. Robbins SL, Rodrequez FL, Wragg AL, Fish SJ. Problems in quantitation of coronary atheroscelerosis. Am J Cardiol 1966; 18: 153-159.
5. Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973; 47: 162-169.
6. Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Lesperance J. Discrepancies between cineangiographic and post-mortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 1974; 49: 703-708.
7. Foerster JM, Lantz BM, Holcroft JW, Link DP, Mason DT. Angiographic measurement of coronary blood flow by videodilution technique. Acta Radiologica: Diagnosis 1981; 22: 121-127.
8. Foerster JM, Link DP, Lantz BM, Lee G, Holcroft JW, Mason DT. Measurement of coronary reactive hyperemia during clinical angiography by videodilution technique. Acta Radiologica: Diagnosis 1981; 22: 209-216.
9. Bursch JH. Use of digitized functional angiography to evaluate arterial blood flow. Cardiovasc Inter Radiol 1983; 6: 303-310.
10. Nissen SE, Elion JL, Booth DC, Evans J, DeMaria AN. Value and limitations of computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1986; 73: 562-571.
11. Rutishauser W, Bussman WD, Noseda G, Meier W, Wellauer J. Blood flow measurement through single coronary arteries by roentgen densitometry. Am J Roentgenol 1970; 109: 12-20.
12. Smith HC, Sturm RE, Wood EH. Videodensitometric system for measurement of vessel blood flow, particularly in the coronary arteries in man. Am J Cardiol 1973; 32: 144-150.
13. Spiller P, Schmiel FK, Politz B, et al. Measurement of systolic and diastolic flow rates in the coronary artery system by x-ray densitometry. Circulation 1983; 68: 337-347.
14. Eigler NL, Pfaff JM, Zeiher A, Whiting JS, Forrester JS. Digital angiographic impulse response analysis of regional myocardial perfusion: linearity, reproducibility, accuracy and comparison with conventional indicator dilution curve parameters in phantom and canine models. Cir Res 1989; 64: 853-866.
15. Pijls NH, Uijen GJ, Hoevelaken A, et al. Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry. Circulation 1990; 81: 1331-1340.
16. Vogel R, LeFree MT, Bates ER, et al. Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J 1984; 107: 153-164.
17. Hodgson JM, LeGrand V, Bates ER, et al. Validation in dogs of a rapid digital angiographic technique to measure relative coronary blood flow during routine cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 188-193.
18. Cusma JT, Toggart EJ, Folts JD, et al. Digital subtreaction angiographic imaging of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1987; 75: 461-472.
19. Geldof MJ, Schalij MJ, Manger Cats V, et al. Comparison between regional myocardial perfusion reserve and coronary flow reserve in the canine heart. Eur Heart J 1995; 16(12): 1860-71.
20. Hangiandreou N, Folts J, Peppler W, Mistretta C. Coronary blood flow measurement using an angiographic first pass distribtion technique: A feasibility sludy. Med. Phys. 1991; 18(5): 947-954.
21. Marinus H, Buis B, Van Benthem A. Pulsatile coronary flow determination by digital angiography. Int J Cardiac Imag 1990; 5: 173-182.
22. Molloi S, Qian YJ, Ersahin A. Absolute volumetric blood flow measurements using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys 1993; 20(1): 85-91.
23. Molloi S, Ersahin A, Tang J, Hicks J, Leung C. Quantification of volumetric coronary blood flow with dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Circulation 1996; 93: 1919-27.
24. Molloi SY, Mistretta CA. Scatter-glare corrections in quantitative dual-energy fluoroscopy. Med Phys 1988; 15(3): 289-97.
25. Ersahin A, Molloi S, Yao-Jin Q. A digital filtration technique for scatter-glare correction based on thickness estimation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1995; 14: 587-95.
26. Molloi SY, Ersahin A, Roeck WW, Nalcioglu O. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA. Invest Radiol 1991; 26(2): 119-27.
27. Molloi SY, Mistretta CA. Quantification techniques for dual-energy cardiac imaging. Med Phys 1989; 16(2): 209-17.
28. Hodgson J, Mancini J, Legrand V, Vogel R. Characterization of changes in coronary blood flow during the first six seconds after intracoronary contrast injection. Invest Radiol 1985; 20: 246-252.