Local density augmentation in neat supercritical fluids: The role of electrostatic interactions

Chemical Physics Letters

Volumn 378, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 410-419

  Song, W ^a   Maroncelli, M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHANE; FLUOROFORM;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENSITY; ELECTRICITY; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID;

EID: 0141786691     PISSN: 00092614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2003.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tucker S.C. Chem. Rev. 99:1999;391.
2. Tucker S.C., Maddox M.W. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:1998;2437.
3. Lewis J., Biswas R., Robinson A., Maroncelli M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:2001;3306.
4. Song W., Biswas R., Maroncelli M. J. Phys. Chem. A. 104:2000;6924.
5. Egorov S. J. Chem. Phys. 112:2000;7138.
6. Patel N., Biswas R., Maroncelli M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:2002;7096.
7. Siavosh-Haghighi A., Adams J.E. J. Phys. Chem. A. 105:2001;2680.
8. 2 solvent molecule.
9. We note that the density augmentation observed in simulations of neat 2-dimensional Lennard-Jones systems by Tucker and co-workers [M. Maddox, G. Goodyear, and S. Tucker, J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 6248-6257] are much larger than are found in 3-dimensional systems.
10. Egorov S.A., Yethiraj A., Skinner J.L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 317:2000;558.
11. Echargui M., Marsault-Herail F. Mol. Phys. 60:1987;605.
12. Ben-Amotz D., LaPlant F., Shea D., Gardecki J., List D. Bright F.V., McNally M.E.P. Supercritical Fluid Technology. vol. 488:1992;18-30 American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
13. Nakayama H., Saitow K., Sakashita M., Ishii K., Nishikawa K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 320:2000;323.
14. Saitow K., Otake H., Nakayama H., Ishii K., Nishikawa K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 368:2003;209.
15. Song W., Patel N., Maroncelli M. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:2002;8783.
16. Martin M.G., Siepmann J.I. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:1998;2569.
17. Ishii R., Okazaki S., Okada I., Furusaka M., Watanabe N., Misawa M., Fukunaga T. J. Chem. Phys. 105:1996;7011.
18. Yoshii N., Okazaki S. J. Chem. Phys. 107:1997;2020.
19. Goodyear G., Maddox M., Tucker S. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:2000;6258.
20. Schweizer K.S., Chandler D. J. Chem. Phys. 76:1982;2296.
21. Kolling O.W. J. Phys. Chem. 100:1996;16087.
22. Buckingham A. Proc. R. Soc. (London) A. 248:1958;169.
23. Reichardt C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. second ed. 1988;VCH, Weinheim.
24. Koutek B. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 43:1978;2368.
25. 2 in the presence of solute polarizability.
26. For consistency, the dielectric constants of the model fluid given in [15] and n=1 were used for this comparison, rather than values for the experimental fluid.
27. Matyushov D., Schmid R. J. Chem. Phys. 105:1996;4729.
28. Oxtoby D.W. Adv. Chem. Phys. 40:1979;1.
29. Frankland S.J.V., Maroncelli M. J. Chem. Phys. 110:1999;1687.
30. Fricsh M.J.et al. GAUSSIAN 98. 1998;Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh, PA.
31. Landoldt-Bornstein Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology. 1974;Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Foresman J., Keith T.A., Wiberg K., Snoonian J., Frisch M.J. J. Phys. Chem. 100:1996;16098.
33. The shifts listed here result from using the default value for the isodensity surface, 0.0004 a.u. Other choices in the reasonable range, 0.0004-0.001 a.u. would yield quantitatively different, but qualitatively similar, results.
34. Smith W., Forester T.R. DL_POLY_2. 2001;CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, UK.