Quantitative comparisons of dissolved hydrogen density and the electrical and optical properties of ZnO

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 2888-2894

  Seager, C H ^a   Myers, S M ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING; CARRIER CONCENTRATION; ELECTRIC PROPERTIES; HYDROGEN; OPTICAL PROPERTIES;

CONDUCTION BAND;

ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0141745997     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1595147     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. T. Aoki, Y. Hatanaka, and D. C. Look, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3257 (2000).
2. D. C. Look, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 80, 383 (2001).
3. A. Poppl and G. Volkel, Phys. Status Solidi A 125, 571 (1991).
4. K. VanHeusden, W. L. Warren, C. H. Seager, D. R. Tallant, and J. A. Voigt, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 7983 (1996).
5. T. J. Gray, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 37, 534 (1954).
6. A. F. Kohan, G. Ceder, D. Morgan, and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15019 (2000).
7. C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1012 (2000).
8. E. Mollwo, Z. Phys. 138, 478 (1954).
9. D. G. Thomas and J. J. Lander, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3, 87 (1957).
10. S. Kohiki, M. Nishitani, T. Wada, and T. Hirao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2876 (1994).
11. S J. Baik, J. H. Jang, C. H. Lee, W. Y. Cho, and K. S. Lim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3516 (1997).
12. D. Hofmann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 045504 (2002).
13. E. V. Lavrov, J. Weber, F. Borniert, C. G. Van de Walle, and R. Helbig, Phys. Rev. B 66, 165205 (2002).
14. M. D. McCluskey, S. J. Jokela, K. K. Zhuralev, P. J. Simpson, and K. G. Lynn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3807 (2002).
15. Atomergic Chemetals Corp., 71 Carolyn Blvd., Farmingdale, NY 11735.
16. SCI Engineered Materials, 1145 Chesapeake Ave., Columbus, OH 43212.
17. Rubicon Technology, 9931 Franklin Ave., Franklin Park, IL 60131.
18. L. J. van der Pauw, Philips Res. Rep. 13, 1 (1958).
19. W. Moller and F. Besenbacher, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 168, 111 (1980).
20. S. M. Myers, G. R. Caskey, Jr., D. E. Rawl, Jr., and R. D. Sisson, Jr., Metall. Trans. A 14A, 2261 (1983).
21. Handbook of Modern Ion Beam Materials Analysis, edited by J. R. Tesmer and M. Nastasi (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), pp. 153 and 561.
22. This analysis was performed at Charles Evans and Associates, 810 Kifer Rd., Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
23. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969), p. 39; the prefactor of the expression for ionized impurity scattering was adjusted to yield agreement with Si and Ge mobility data in the same charge density range.
24. D. G. Thomas, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 47 (1959).
25. J. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors (Dover, N.Y., 1971), p. 75.
26. C. H. Seager and J. Kanicki, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15163 (1992).
27. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969), p. 34; the conduction band effective mass was taken to be 0.316 (units of the free electron mass) from D. C. Look, R. L. Jones, J. R. Sizelove, N. Y. Garces, N. C. Giles, and L. E. Halliburton, Phys. Status Solidi A 195, 171 (2003).
28. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969), p. 34; the conduction band effective mass was taken to be 0.316 (units of the free electron mass) from D. C. Look, R. L. Jones, J. R. Sizelove, N. Y. Garces, N. C. Giles, and L. E. Halliburton, Phys. Status Solidi A 195, 171 (2003).
29. A. F. Wright, Phys. Rev. B 60, R5101 (1999).
30. S. M. Myers, A. F. Wright, G. A. Petersen, C. H. Seager, W. R. Wampler, M. H. Crawford, and J. Han, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 4676 (2000).
31. M. W. Chase, C. A. Davies, J. R. Downey, Jr., D. J. Frurip, R. A. McDonald, and A. N. Syverud, JANF Thermochemical Tables, 3rd ed. (AIP, New York, 1986), pp. 991, 1002, 1211, and 1260.
32. A. Wright, J. Appl. Phys. (submitted).