New methods for shape and depth determinations from SP data

Geophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1202-1210

  Abdelrahman, El Sayed M ^a   El Araby, Hesham M ^a   Hassaneen, Abdel Rady G ^b   Hafez, Mahfooz A ^b  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; POSITION MEASUREMENT; POTENTIAL ENERGY FUNCTIONS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

RANDOM NOISE; BURIED-OBJECT DETECTION; DEPTH DETERMINATION; DERIVATIVE ANALYSIS; GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES; LEAST MEAN SQUARES METHODS; LEAST SQUARES METHODS; LEAST SQUARES MINIMIZATION; SHAPE MEASUREMENTS;

GEOPHYSICS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

BURIED STRUCTURE; DEPTH; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; SELF POTENTIAL; SHAPE;

EID: 0141737558     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1598112     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdelrahman, E. M., Riad, S., Refai, E., and Amin, Y., 1985, On the least-squares residual anomaly determination: Geophysics, 50, 473-480.
2. Abdelrahman, E. M., and Sharafeldin, S. M., 1997, A least-squares approach to depth determination from residual self-potential anomalies caused by horizontal cylinders and spheres: Geophysics, 62, 44-48.
3. Abdelrahman, E. M., El-Araby, T. M., Ammar, A. A., and Hassanein. H. I., 1997a, A least-squares approach to shape determination from self-potential anomalies: Pure Appl. Geophys., 150, 121-128.
4. Abdelrahman, E. M., Ammar, A. A., Sharafeldin, S. M., and Hassanein, H. I., 1997b, Shape and depth solutions from numerical horizontal self-potential gradients: Appl. Geophys., 36, 31-43.
5. Abdelrahman, E. M., Ammar, A. A., Hassanein H. I., and Hafez, M. A., 1998, Derivative analysis of SP anomalies: Geophysics, 63, 890-497.
6. Agarwal, B. N. P., and Lal, T., 1971, Application of rational approximation in calculation of the second derivative of the gravity field: Geophysics, 36, 571-581.
7. Bhattacharya, B. B., and Roy, N., 1981, A note on the use of nomograms for self-potential anomalies: Geophys. Pros., 29, 102-107.
8. Demidovich, B. P., and Maron, I. A., 1973, Computational mathematics, Mir Publ.
9. Furness, P., 1992, Modelling spontaneous mineralization potentials with a new integral equation: J. Appl. Geophys, 29, 143-155.
10. Guptasarma, D., 1983, Effect of surface polarization on resistivity modelling: Geophysics, 48, 98-106.
11. Hammer, S., 1977, Graticule spacing versus depth discrimination in gravity interpretation: Geophysics, 42, 60-65.
12. Jackson, D. D., 1972, Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 28, 97-109.
13. Meiser, P., 1962, A method of quantitative interpretation self-potential measurements: Geophys. Prosp., 10, 203-218.
14. Nettleton, L. L., 1976, Gravity and magnetic in oil prospecting: Mc-Graw Hill Book Co.
15. Paul, M. K., 1965, Direct interpretations of self-potential extension anomalies caused by inclined sheets of infinite horizontal extension: Geophysics, 30, 418-423.
16. Peters, L. J., 1949, The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application: Geophysics, 14, 290-320.
17. Rao, A. D., and Babu, R. H. V., 1983, Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies due two-dimensional sheet-like bodies: Geophysics, 48, 1659-1664.
18. Shi, W., and Morgan, F. D., 1996, Non-uniqueness in self-potential inversion: 66th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Extended Abstracts, 950-953.
19. Stanley, J. M., 1977, Simplified magnetic interpretation of the geologic contact and thin dike: Geophysics, 42, 1236-1240.
20. Syberg, F. J. R., 1972, A Fourier method for the regional-residual problem of potential fields: Geophys. Prosp., 20, 47-75.
21. Yungul, S., 1950, Interpretation of spontaneous polarization anomalies caused by spherical ore bodies: Geophysics, 15, 237-246.