Shape and depth solutions from numerical horizontal self-potential gradients

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 31-43

  Abdelrahman, E M ^a   Ammar, A A ^b   Sharafeldin, S M ^a   Hassanein, H I ^b  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Numerical horizontal gradients; SP interpretation

Indexed keywords

GEOPHYSICS; POLARIZATION; SIGNAL FILTERING AND PREDICTION;

ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTS; NUMERICAL HORIZONTAL SELF POTENTIAL GRADIENTS; WINDOW CURVES;

SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL LOGGING;

DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRICAL METHOD; NUMERICAL HORIZONTAL GRADIENT; SELF POTENTIAL ANOMALY; SELF POTENTIAL DATA;

TURKEY;

EID: 0031127880     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(96)00058-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdelrahman, E.M. and El-Araby, H.M., 1993. Shape and depth solutions from gravity data using correlation factors between successive least-squares residuals. Geophysics, 59: 1789-1791.
2. Agarwal, B.N.P., 1984. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies. In: 54th. Annu. Int. Meet. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, Session: SP. 2.
3. Anderson, L.A., 1984. Self-potential investigations in the Puhimau thermal area, Ilauea Volcano, Hawaii. In: 54th Annu. Int. Meet. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, Session: EM. 3.5.
4. Atchuta Rao, D. and Ram Babu, H.V., 1983. Quantitative interpretation of self potential anomalies due two-dimensional sheet-like bodies. Geophysics, 48: 1659-1664.
5. Atchuta Rao, D., Ram Babu, H.V. and Sivakumar Sinha, G.D.J., 1982. A Fourier transform method for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to two-dimensional inclined sheets of finite depth extent. Pure Appl. Geophys., 120: 365-374.
6. Banerjee, B., 1971. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies of some specific geometric bodies. Pure Appl. Geophys., 90: 138, 152.
7. Bhattacharya, B.B. and Roy, N., 1981. A note on the use of nomogram for self-potential anomalies. Geophys. Prospect., 29: 102-107.
8. Corwin, R.F., 1984. The self-potential method and its engineering applications; an overview. In: 54th Annu. Int. Meet. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, Session: SP. 1.
9. Corwin, R.F. and Hoover, D.B., 1979. The self-potential method in geothermal exploration. Geophysics, 44: 226-245.
10. Fitterman, D.V., 1979. Calculations of self-potential anomalies near vertical contacts. Geophysics, 44: 195-205.
11. Fitterman, D.V. and Corwin, R.F., 1982. Inversion of self-potential data from the Cerro-Prieto geothermal field Mexico. Geophysics, 47: 938-945.
12. Kilty, K.T., 1984. On the origin and interpretation of self-potential anomalies. Geophys. Prospect., 32: 51-62.
13. Markiewicz, R.D., Davenport, G.C. and Randall, J.A., 1984. The use of self-potential surveys in geotechnical investigations. In: 54th Annu. Int. Meet. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, Session: SP. 6.
14. Paul, M.K., 1965. Direct interpretation of self-potential extensions anomalies caused by inclined sheets of infinite horizontal extensions. Geophysics, 30: 418-423.
15. Paul, M.K., Datta, S. and Banerjee, B., 1965. Interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to localized causative bodies. Pure Appl. Geophys., 61: 95-100.
16. Ram Babu, H.V. and Atchuta Rao, D., 1988. A rapid graphical method for the interpretation of the self-potential anomaly over a two-dimensional inclined sheet of finite depth extent (short note). Geophysics, 53: 1126-1128.
17. Roy, A. and Chowdhury, D.K., 1959. Interpretation of self-potential data for tabular bodies. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 3: 35-54.
18. Satyanarayana Murty, B.V. and Haricharan, P., 1985. Nomogram for the complete interpretation of spontaneous potential profile over sheet-like and cylindrical two-dimensional sources. Geophysics, 50: 1127-1135.
19. Schiavone, D. and Quarto, R., 1992. Cavities detection using the self-potential method. 54th Meet. Eur. Assoc. Expl. Geophys., Abstracts, 362-363 (Eur. Assoc. Expl. Geophys).
20. Stanley, J.M., 1977. Simplified magnetic interpretation of the geologic contact and thin dike. Geophysics, 42: 1236-1240.
21. Yungul, S., 1950. Interpretation of spontaneous polarization anomalies caused by spheroidal ore bodies. Geophysics, 15: 237-246.