Theoretical study of solvent-exchange reactions on hexasolvated divalent cations in the first transition series: Model calculation of a hydrogen cyanide exchange

Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan

Volumn 76, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1713-1722

  Wasada Tsutsui, Yuko ^a   Wasada, Hiroaki ^b   Funahashi, Shigenobu ^c  

^a NAGOYA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; POSITIVE IONS; SOLVENTS;

NITRILE-EXCHANGE REACTIONS;

REACTION KINETICS;

HYDROGEN CYANIDE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DENSITY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR STABILITY; PHASE TRANSITION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; VIBRATION;

EID: 0141706588     PISSN: 00092673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.76.1713     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J. A. Riddick, W. B. Bunger, and T. K. Sakano, "Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and Methods of Purification," 4th ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1986).
2. H. Ohtaki and T. Radnai, Chem. Rev., 93, 1157 (1993).
3. a) M. Ishii, S. Funahashi, K. Ishihara, and M. Tanaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 62, 1852 (1989).
4. b) Y. Inada, T. Sugata, K. Ozutsumi, and S. Funahashi, Inorg. Chem., 37, 1886 (1998).
5. c) Y. Inada and S. Funahashi, Anal. Sci., 13, 373 (1997).
6. d) S. Funahashi and Y. Inada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 75, 1901 (2002).
7. a) A. E. Merbach, Pure Appl. Chem., 59, 161 (1987).
8. b) R. van Eldik, T. Asano, and W. J. le Noble, Chem. Rev., 89, 549 (1989).
9. a) R. Åkesson, L. G. M. Pettersson, M. Sandström, Per E. M. Siegbahn, and U. Wahlgren, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 10773 (1992).
10. b) R. Åkesson, L. G. M. Pettersson, M. Sandström, Per E. M. Siegbahn, and U. Wahlgren, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 3765 (1993).
11. c) R. Åkesson, L. G. M. Pettersson, M. Sandström, and U. Wahlgren, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 8691 (1994).
12. d) F. P. Rotzinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 6760 (1996).
13. e) F. P. Rotzinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 5230 (1997).
14. f) M. Hartmann, T. Clark, and R. van Eldik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 7843 (1996).
15. g) M. Hartmann, T. Clark, and R. van Eldik, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 9899 (1999).
16. h) M. A. Lee, N. W. Winter, and W. H. Casey, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 8641 (1994).
17. i) R. J. Deeth and L. I. Elding, Inorg. Chem., 35, 5019 (1996).
18. j) Th. Kowall, P. Caravan, H. Bourgeois, L. Helm, F. P. Rotzinger, and A. E. Merbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 6569 (1998).
19. a) Y. Tsutsui, H. Wasada, and S. Funahashi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 70, 1813 (1997).
20. b) Y. Tsutsui, H. Wasada, and S. Funahashi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 71, 73 (1998).
21. c) Y. Tsutsui, H. Wasada, and S. Funahashi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 71, 1771 (1998).
22. d) Y. Tsutsui, H. Wasada, and S. Funahashi, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM, 461-462, 379 (1999).
23. C. N. Langford and H. B. Gray, "Ligand Substitution Processes, " Benjamin, Inc., New York (1966).
24. Hydrogen cyanide as a protic solvent is quite different from aprotic nitriles such as acetonitrile, because the former produces cyanide anion in solution but the latter does not. However, proton transfers in the present cluster model are meaningless because the model has no proton acceptor such as a solvent. Moreover, we have already showed that the difference between hydrogen cyanide and acetonitrile is small in solvation energy to Ag(I) ions. For further details, see: Y. Tsutsui, K. Sugimoto, H. Wasada, Y. Inada, and S. Funahashi, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 2900 (1997).
25. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys., 19, 553 (1970).
26. a) A. J. H. Wachters, J. Chem. Phys., 52, 1033 (1970).
27. b) S. Huzinaga, J. Andzelm, M. Klobukowski, E. Radzio-Andzelm, Y. Sakai, and H. Tatewaki, "Physical Sciences Data 16: Gaussian Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations," Elsevier, Amsterdam (1984).
28. c) E. R. Davidson and D. Feller, Chem. Rev., 86, 681 (1986).
29. d) S. Huzinaga, J. Chem. Phys., 42, 1293 (1965).
30. e) T. H. Dunning, J. Chem. Phys., 53, 2823 (1970).
31. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, A. G. Baboul, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. Pople, "Gaussian 98," Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
32. Y. Tsutsui and H. Wasada, Chem. Lett., 1995, 517.
33. a) H. Wasada and Y. Tsutsui, Bulletin of the College of General Education, 32, 153 (1995).
34. I. Takahashi, H. Wasada, and Y. Tsutsui, MOVIEW: program of Nagoya University Computer Center representing molecular orbitals and electron density maps by isosurfaces.
35. H. Tachikawa, T. Ichikawa, and H. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 982 (1990).
36. 7. This behavior is similar to the case of stabilization related to d electron configurations. Therefore, the total binding energies of heptasolvation obtained by MP2 and Hartree-Fock calculations depend on the central cations in the almost same way.
37. R. F. W. Bader, Can. J. Chem., 40, 1164 (1962).
38. j(r) (c is a constant). (6) For further details, see Ref. 16.
39. z2, we picked up the states having the largest coefficient of the configuration. The correlation coefficient of the excitation energies with the difference between orbital energies related to the excitation is 0.99. The excitation energies are dominantly ruled by the orbital energy differences and relaxation in the excitation has a constant effect on a series of these compounds.
40. a) A. E. Reed, R. B. Weinstock, and F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys., 83, 1164 (1985).
41. b) A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, and F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev., 88, 899 (1988).