Hohokam craft economies and the materialization of power

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 69-95

  Bayman, James M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Craft economy; Power; archaeology; Prestige goods

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141700049     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016132225354     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Arnold, J. E. (1992). Complex hunter-gatherer-fishers of prehistoric California: Chiefs, specialists, and maritime adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57: 60-84.
2. Bahr, D., Smith, J., Allison, W. S., and Hayden, J. (1994). The Short, Swift Time of Gods on Earth: The Hohokam Chronicles. University of California Press, Berkeley.
3. Bayman, J. M. (1995). Rethinking redistribution in the archaeological record: Obsidian exchange at the Marana Platform Mound. Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 37-63.
4. Bayman, J. M. (1996). Shell ornament consumption in a Classic Hohokam community center. Journal of Field Archaeology 23: 403-420.
5. Bayman, J. M. (1999). Craft economies in the North American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Research 1: 249-299.
6. Bayman, J. M. (2001 ). The Hohokam of Southwest North America. Journal of World Prehistory 15: 257-311.
7. Bayman, J. M., and Shackley, M. S. (1997). Dynamics of Hohokam obsidian circulation in the North American Southwest. Antiquity 73: 836-845.
8. Blanton, R., Feinman, G., Kowalewski, S., and Peregine, P. (1996). A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37: 1-14.
9. Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology 34: 227-254.
10. Bostwick, T. W. (1992). Platform mound ceremonialism in southern Arizona: Possible symbolic meanings of Hohokam and Salado platform mounds. In Lange, R. C., and Germick, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Salado Conference, Globe, AZ, Occasional Papers of the Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 78-85.
11. Bostwick, T. W., and Downum, C. E. (1994). Site structure and ceremony at Pueblo Grande. In Bostwick, T. W., and Downum, C. E. (eds.), Archaeology of the Pueblo Grande Platform Mound and Surrounding Features: Features in the Central Precinct of the Pueblo Grande Community, Vol. 2, Pueblo Grande Museum Anthropological Papers, No. 1, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 297-386.
12. Bradley, R. J. (1997a). Shell artifacts from the Schoolhouse Point Mesa sites. In Lindauer, O. (ed.), The Archaeology of Schoolhouse Point Mesa, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Schoolhouse Point Mesa Sites, Schoolhouse Management Group, Pinto Creek Complex, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 8, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 37, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 463-469.
13. Bradley, R. J. (1997b). Shell artifacts from the Cline Mesa sites. In Oliver, T. J., and Jacobs, D. (eds.), Salado Residential Settlements on Tonto Creek, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Cline Mesa Sites, Cline Terrace Complex, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 9, Part 2, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 38, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 747-756.
14. Bradley, R. J. (2000). Networks of shell ornament exchange: A critical assessment of prestige goods economies in the North American Southwest. In Hegmon, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare, and Exchange Across the American Southwest & Beyond, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO, pp. 167-187.
15. Bradley, R. J., and Rice, G. E. (1996). Shell artifacts from the Schoolhouse Point mound, U:8:24/13a. In Lindauer, O. (ed.), The Place of the Storehouses, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Schoolhouse Point Mound, Pinto Creek Complex, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 6, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 35, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 583-598.
16. Bradley, R. J., and Rice, G. E. (1997). Shell artifacts from U:4:33/132, the Cline Terrace mound. In Jacobs, D. (ed.), A Salado Platform Mound on Tonto Creek, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Cline Terrace Mound, Cline Terrace Complex, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 7, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 36, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 455-464.
17. Brand, D. (1938). Aboriginal trade routes for sea shells in the Southwest. Association of Pacific Coast Geographers Yearbook 4: 3-10.
18. Brown, J. A., Kerber, R. A., and Winters, H. D. (1990). Trade and the evolution of exchange relations at the beginning of the Mississippian period. In Smith, B. D. (ed.), The Mississippian Emergence, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 251-280.
19. Brumfiel, E. M., and Earle, T. K. (1987). Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies: An Introduction. In Brumfiel, E. M., and Earle, T. K. (eds.), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-9.
20. Chenault, M. L. (2000). In defense of the Polvoron phase. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village Revisited, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, CO, pp. 277-286.
21. Clark, J. E., and Blake, M. (1994). The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In Brumfiel, E. M., and Fox, J.W. (eds.), Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 17-30.
22. Cobb, C. (1989). An appraisal of the role of Mill Creek Chert Hoes in Mississippian exchange systems. Southeastern Archaeology 8: 79-92.
23. Cobb, C. (1993). Archaeological approaches to the political economy of nonstratified societies. In Schiffer,M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 43-100.
24. Cobb, C. (1996). Specialization, Exchange, and Power in Small-Scale Societies and Chiefdoms. Research in Economic Anthropology 17: 251-294.
25. Cobb, C. R., Maymon, J., and McGuire, R. H. (1999). Feathered, Horned, and Antlered Serpents: Mesoamerican Connections with the Southwest and Southeast. In Neitzel, J. E. (ed.), Great Towns and Regional Polities in the Prehistoric American Southwest and Southeast, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 165-181.
26. Crown, P. L. (1991a). The role of exchange and interaction in Salt-Gila basin Hohokam prehistory. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 231-278.
27. Crown, P. L. (1991b). The Hohokam: Current Views of Prehistory and the Regional System. In Crown, P. J., and Judge, W. J. (eds.), Chaco & Hohokam: Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 135-157.
28. Crown, P. L. (2000). Gendered tasks, power, and prestige in the Prehispanic American Southwest. In Crown, P. L. (ed.), Women & Men in the Prehispanic Southwest: Labor, Power, and Prestige, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 3-41.
29. Crown, P. L., and Fish, S. K. (1996). Gender and status in the Hohokam Pre-Classic to Classic transition. American Anthropologist 98: 803-817.
30. Dean, J. S. (1991). Thoughts on Hohokam chronology. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
31. DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., and Earle, T. K. (1996). Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Current Anthropology 37: 15-31.
32. Dietler, M., and Herbich, I. (1998). Habitus, techniques, style: An integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In Stark, M. T. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 232-262.
33. Dobres, M., and Robb, J. E. (1997). Agency in Archaeology. Routledge, London.
34. Doelle, W. H. (1980). Past Adaptive Patterns in Western Papagueria: An Archaeological Study of Nonriverine Resource Use. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
35. Doolittle,W. E. (1990). Canal irrigation in PrehistoricMexico: The Sequence of Technological Change, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
36. Douglas, J. E. (2000). Exchanges, assumptions, and mortuary goods in pre-Paquime Chihuahua, Mexico. In Hegmon, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, warfare, & exchange across the American Southwest & Beyond, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO, pp. 189-208.
37. Doyel, D. E. (1981). Late Hohokam Prehistory in Southern Arizona. Contributions to Archaeology, No. 2, Gila Press, Scottsdale, AZ.
38. Doyel, D. E. (1991). Hohokam Cultural Evolution in the Phoenix Basin. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 231-278.
39. Doyel, D. E. (1996). Resource mobilization and Hohokam society: An analysis of obsidian artifacts from the Gatlin site. KIVA 62: 45-60.
40. Doyel, D. E. (2000). Settlement organization at Gila Bend. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village Revisited, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 101-138.
41. Doyel, D. E., and Fish, S. K. (2000). Prehistoric villages and communities in the Arizona desert. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 1-35.
42. Dupre, G., and Rey, P. (1973). Reflections on the pertinence of a theory of the history of exchange. Economy and Society 2: 131-163.
43. Dye, D. H. (1995). Feasting with the enemy: Mississippian warfare and prestige-goods circulation. In Nassaney, M. S., and Sassaman, K. E. (eds.), Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretations in the EasternWoodlands, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN, pp. 289-316.
44. Earle, T. K. (1982). The ecology and politics of primitive valuables. In Kennedy, J., and Edgerton, R. (eds.), Culture and Ecology: Eclectic Perspectives, Special Publications of the American Anthropological Association, No. 15, Washington, DC, pp. 65-83.
45. Ekholm, K. (1978). External exchange and the transformation of central African social systems. In Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. J. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, Duckworth, London, pp. 115-136.
46. Elson, M. D. (1998). Expanding the View of Hohokam Platform Mounds: An Ethnographic Perspective, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, No. 63, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
47. Feinman, G. M. (2000). Dual-processual theory and social formations in the Southwest. In Mills, B. J. (ed.), Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 207-224.
48. Fewkes, J.W. (1896a). Pacific coast shells from prehistoric Tusayan pueblos. American Anthropologist IX: 359-367.
49. Fewkes, J. W. (1896b). Preliminary Account of an Expedition to the Cliff Villages of the Red Rock Country, and the Tusayan Ruins of Sikyatki and Awatobi, Arizona in 1895. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
50. Fewkes, J.W. (1912). Casa Grande, Arizona. In Twenty-Eighth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1906-1907, Smithsonian Instituition, Washington, DC, pp. 25-179.
51. Fish, P. R., and Fish, S. K. (2000a). The Marana platform mound site: Patterns of social differentiation in the early Classic period. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village Revisited, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 245-275.
52. Fish, P. R., Fish, S. K., Brennan, C, Gann, D., and Bayman, J. M. (1992). Marana: Configuration of an early Classic period Hohokam platform mound site. In Lange, R. C., and Germick, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Salado Conference, Globe, Arizona, 1992, Arizona Archaeological Society Occasional Paper, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 62-68.
53. Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (2000b). Civic-Territorial Organization and the Roots of Hohokam Complexity. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village Revisited, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 373-390.
54. Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (2000c). The institutional context of Hohokam complexity. In Mills, B. J. (ed.), Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 154-167.
55. Fish, S. K., and Yoffee, N. (1996). The state of the Hohokam. In Meyer, D. A., Dawson, P. C., and Hanna, D. T. (eds.), Debating Complexity: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Chacmool Conference, Archaeological Association and the Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, Alberta, pp. 290-296.
56. Flannery,K.V. (1976). Contextual analysis of ritual paraphernalia from Formative Oaxaca. In Flannery, K. V. (ed.), The Early Mesoamerican Village, Academic Press, New York, pp. 333-345.
57. Frankenstein, S., and Rowlands, M. J. (1978). The internal structure and regional context of early Iron age society in south-western Germany, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, No. 15: 73-112.
58. Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. J. (1977). Notes toward an epigenetic model of the evolution of a civilization. In Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. J. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, Duckworth, London, pp. 201-276.
59. Gifford, E. W. (1946). Archaeology in the Puerto Penasco Region, Sonora. American Antiquity 11: 225-219.
60. Gladwin, H. S., Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Gladwin, N. (1937). Excavations at Snaketown, Medallion Papers, No. 25, Gila Pueblo, Globe, AZ.
61. Griffith, C. A., and McCartney, P. H. (1994). Shell artifacts from the Livingston area. In Jacobs, D., Archaeology of the Salado in the Livingston Area of the Tonto Basin, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Livingston Management Group, Pinto Creek Complex, Part 2, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 3, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 32, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 799-808.
62. Halstead, P., and O'Shea, J. O. (1982). A friend in need is a friend indeed: Social storage and the origins of social ranking. In Renfrew, C., and Shennan, S. (eds.), Ranking, Resource, and Exchange, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 92-99.
63. Harry, K. G., and Bayman, J. M. (2000). Leadership among the Classic period Hohokam: A case study. In Mills, B. J. (ed.), Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 136-153.
64. Haury, E.W. (1945). The Excavation of Los Muertos and Neighboring in the Salt River Valley, Southern Arizona, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 24, No. 1, Cambridge University, Harvard.
65. Haury, E. W. (1976). The Hohokam: Desert Farmers and Craftsmen, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
66. Hayden, B. (1995). Pathways to power: Principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. M. (eds.), Foundations of Social Inequality, Plenum, New York, pp. 15-86.
67. Hayden, B. (1999). Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 1-55.
68. Hayden, J. D. (1935). Pima creation myth (Manuscript on file), Arizona State Museum Archives, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, p. A-215.
69. Hayden, J. D. (1972). Hohokam petroglyphs of the Sierra Pinacate, Sonora, and the Hohokam shell expeditions. The Kiva 37: 74-83.
70. Helms, M. (1976). Ancient Panama: Chiefs in Search of Power, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
71. Helms, M. (1993). Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade, and Power, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
72. Henderson, T. K., and Hackbarth, M. R. (2000). What is going on in the Hohokam village? A fourteenth and fifteenth century perspective. In Doyel, D. E., Fish, S. K., and Fish, P. R. (eds.), The Hohokam Village Revisited, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood, pp. 287-316.
73. Hill,W. D., and Clark, J. E. (2001). Sports, gambling, and government: America's first social compact? American Anthropologist 103: 331-345.
74. Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
75. Hodder, I. (1991). Reading the Past, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
76. Howard, A. V. (1993). Marine shell artifacts and production processes at Shelltown and the Hind site. In Marmaduke, W. S., and Martynec, R. J. (eds.), Shelltown and the Hindsite: A Study of Two Hohokam Craftsman Communities in Southwestern Arizona, Northland Research, Flagstaff, AZ, pp. 321-423.
77. Howard, J. B. (1992). Architecture and ideology: An approach to the functional analysis of platform mounds. In Lange, R. C., and Germick, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Salado Conference, Globe, AZ 1992, Occasional Papers of the Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 69-85.
78. Huckell, L. W., and Huckell, B. B. (1979). Marine shell from AZ y:8:3, the Lago Seco site. In Huckell, B. B. (ed.), The Coronet Real Project: Archaeological Investigations on the Luke Range, Southwestern Arizona, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series No. 129, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 151-166.
79. Jacobs, D. F. (1992). Increasing ceremonial secrecy at a Salado platform mound. In Redman, C. L., Rice, G. E., and Pedrick, K. E. (eds.), Developing Perspectives on Tonto Basin Prehistory, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 2, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 26, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 45-60.
80. Jernigan, E. W. (1978). Jewelry of the Prehistoric Southwest, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
81. Johnson, A. E. (1960). The Place of the Trincheras Culture of Northern Sonora in Southwestern Archaeology. MA thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
82. Kisselburg, J. E. (1987). Specialization and differentiation: Non-subsistence economic pursuits in courtyard systems at La Ciudad. In Doyel, D. E. (ed.), The Hohokam Village: Site Structure and Organization, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Glenwood Springs, pp. 159-170.
83. Malville, N. (2001). Long-distance transport of bulk goods in the pre-Hispanic American Southwest. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 230-243.
84. Mauss, M. (1954). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, Cohen & West, London.
85. McCartney, P. H. (1995). Shell artifacts from the Bass Point mound, U:8:23/177. In Lindauer, O. (ed.), Where the Rivers Converge, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study: Report on the Rock Island Complex, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 4, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 33, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 351-357.
86. McGuire, R. H. (1989). The greater Southwest as a periphery of Mesoamerica. In Champion, T. (ed.), Centre and Periphery: Comparative Studies in Archaeology, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 40-66.
87. McGuire, R. H. (1991). On the outside looking in: The concept of periphery in Hohokam archaeology. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 347-382.
88. McGuire, R. H. (1992a). A Marxist Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
89. McGuire, R. H. (1992b). Death, Society, and Ideology in a Hohokam Community, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
90. McGuire, R. H. (2001). Ideologies of death and power in the Hohokam community of La Ciudad. In Mitchell, D. R., and Brunson-Hadley, J. L. (eds.), Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspectives, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 27-44.
91. McGuire, R. H., and Howard, A. V. (1987). The structure and organization of Hohokam shell exchange. The Kiva 52: 113-146.
92. McGuire, R. H., and Villapando, C. M. E. (1993). An Archaeological Survey of the Altar Valley, Sonora, Mexico, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 184, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
93. Meillassoux, C. (1978). The economy in agricultural self-sustaining societies:Apreliminary analysis. In Seddon, D. (ed.), Relations of Production: Marxist Approaches to Economic Anthropology, Frank Cass, London, pp. 127-157.
94. Meillassoux, C. (1981). Maidens, Meals, and Money, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
95. Mills, B. J. (ed.) (1999).Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
96. Mills, B. J. (2000). Gender, craft production, and inequality. In Crown, P. L. (ed.),Women & Men in the Prehispanic Southwest: Labor, Power, and Prestige, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 301-343.
97. Mitchell, D. R. (1994). The Pueblo Grande Project: An Analysis of Classic Period Hohokam Mortuary Practices, Soil Systems Publications in Archaeology, No. 20, Vol. 7, Phoenix, AZ.
98. Mitchell, D. R., and Brunson-Hadley, J. L. (2001). An evaluation of Classic period Hohokam burials and society: Chiefs, priests, or acephalous complexity? In Mitchell, D. R., and Brunson-Hadley, J. L. (eds.), Ancient Burial Practices in the American Southwest: Archaeology, Physical Anthropology, and Native American Perspective, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 45-67.
99. Neitzel, J. (1991). Hohokam material culture and behavior: The dimensions of organizational change. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 177-230.
100. Nelson, R. S. (1991). Hohokam Marine Shell Exchange and Artifacts, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 179, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
101. Pauketat, T. R. (2001). Practice and history in archaeology: An emerging paradigm. Anthropological Theory 1: 73-98.
102. Parsons, E. C. (1939). Pueblo Indian Religion, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
103. Peregrine, P. N. (1992). Mississippian Evolution: A World-System Perspective, Prehistory Press, Madison, WN.
104. Preucel, R.W. (1996). Cooking status: Hohokam ideology, power, and social reproduction. In Fish, P. R., and Reid, J. J. (eds.), Interpreting Southwestern Diversity: Underlying Principles and Overarching Patterns, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers No. 48, pp. 125-131.
105. Renfrew, C. (1977). Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution. In Earle, T. K., and Ericson, J. E. (eds.), Exchange Systems in Prehistory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71-90.
106. Rice, G. E. (1998). Organization of trade and craft production in a Gila phase platform mound complex. In Rice, G. E. (ed.), A Synthesis of Tonto Basin Prehistory: The Roosevelt Archaeology Studies, 1989 to 1998, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 12, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 41, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 131-152.
107. Rice, G. E., Simon, A., and Loendorf, C. (1998). Production and exchange of economic goods. In Rice, G. E. (ed.), A Synthesis of Tonto Basin Prehistory: The Roosevelt Archaeology Studies, 1989 to 1998, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 12, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 41, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 105-130.
108. Riley, C. L. (1963). Color direction symbolism: An example of Mesoamerican-Southwestern contacts. American Indigena XXIII: 49-60.
109. Russell, F. (1908). The Pima Indians. In Twenty-sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 3-389.
110. Saitta, D. (1994). Agency, class, and archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 201-227.
111. Saitta, D. (1999). Prestige, agency, and change in middle-range societies. In Robb, J. E. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Paper No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, pp. 135-149.
112. Saitta, D. (2000). Theorizing the political economy of Southwestern exchange. In Hegmon, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare, & Exchange Across the American Southwest & Beyond, University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO, pp. 151-166.
113. Schiffer, M. B., and McGuire, R. H. (1982). The study of cultural adaptations. In Schiffer, M. B., and McGuire, R. H. (eds.), Hohokam and Patayan: Prehistory of Southwestern Arizona, Academic Press, New York, pp. 223-274.
114. Schortman, E. M., and Urban, P. (1992). The political value of imports. In Schortman, E., and Urban, P. (eds.), Resources, Power, and Interregional Interaction, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 158-156.
115. Schortman, E. M., Urban, P. A., and Aucec, M. (2001). Politics with style: Identity formation in prehispanic southeastern Mesoamerica. American Anthropologist 103: 312-330.
116. Schneider, J. (1977). Was there a pre-Capitalist world system? Peasant Studies 6: 20-29.
117. Service, E. R. (1971). Primitive Social Organization: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn., Random House, New York.
118. Seymour, D. J. (1988). An alternative view of Sedentary period Hohokam shell-ornament production. American Antiquity 53: 812-829.
119. Seymour, D. J., and Schiffer, M. B. (1987). A preliminary analysis of pithouse assemblages from Snaketown, Arizona. In Kent, S. (ed.), Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 549-603.
120. Spielmann, K. A. (2000). Gender and exchange. In Crown, P. L. (ed.),Women&Men in the Prehispanic Southwest: Labor, Power, and Prestige, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 345-377.
121. Teague, L. S. (1984a). The organization of the Hohokam economy. In Teague, L. S., and Crown, P. L. (eds.), Hohokam Archaeology along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct, Central Arizona Project: Synthesis and Conclusions, Part 2,Vol. 9, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 150, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 187-250.
122. Teague, L. S. (1984b). Role and ritual in Hohokam society. In Teague, L. S., and Crown, P. L. (eds.), Hohokam Archaeology Along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct Central Arizona Project, Volume IX: Synthesis and Conclusions, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 150, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 155-185.
123. Teague, L. S. (1993). Prehistory and the traditions of the O'odham and Hopi. Kiva 58: 435-454.
124. Tower, D. B. (1947). The use of marine mollusca and their value in reconstructing prehistoric trade routes in the American Southwest. Papers of the Excavators Club, No. 2, Cambridge.
125. Trubitt, M. B. D. (2000). Mound building and prestige goods exchange: Changing strategies in the Cahokia chiefdom. American Antiquity 65: 669-690.
126. Turner, C. G. (1998). Physical anthropology synthesis of the Roosevelt platform mound study. In Rice, G. E. (ed.), A Synthesis of Tonto Basin Prehistory: The Roosevelt Archaeology Studies, 1989 to 1998, Roosevelt Monograph Series, No. 12, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 41, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, pp. 181-191.
127. Tyler, H. A. (1979). Pueblo Birds and Myths, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
128. Underhill, R. M. (1938). Singing for Power: The SongMagic of the Papago Indians of Southern Arizona, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
129. Vokes, A.W. (1987). Shell artifacts. In Ravesloot, J. C. (ed.), The Archaeology of the San Xavier Bridge Site (AX BB:13:14) Tucson Basin, Southern Arizona, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 171, Part 3, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 251-269.
130. Vokes, A. W. (1988). Shell artifacts. In Abbott, D. R., Beckwith, K. E., Crown, P. L., Euler, R. T., Gregory, D. A., London, J. R., Saul, M. B., Schwalbe, L. A., and Bernard-Shaw, M. B. (eds.), The 1982-1983 Excavations at Las Colinas: Material Culture, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 162, Part 4, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 319-384.
131. Vokes, A. W. (1995). The shell assemblage. In Elson, M. D., and Clark, J. J. (eds.), The Roosevelt Community Development Study: Vol. 1, Stone and Shell Artifacts, Anthropological Papers, No. 14, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, AZ, pp. 151-211.
132. Weiner, A. B. (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving Away, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
133. Wilcox, D. R. (1979). The Hohokam regional system. In Rice, G. E., Wilcox, D., Rafferty, K., Schoenwetter, J. (eds.), An Archaeological Test of Sites in the Gila Butte-Santan Region, South-Central Arizona, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers, No. 18, Tempe, AZ, pp. 77-116.
134. Wilcox, D. R. (1991). Hohokam religion: An archaeologist's perspective. In Grant, D. N. (ed.), The Hohokam: Ancient People of the Desert, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 47-61.
135. Wilcox, D. R. (1999). A Peregrine View of Macroregional Systems in the North American Southwest, A.D. 750-1250. In Neitzel, J. E. (ed.), Great Towns and Regional Polities in the Prehistoric American Southwest and Southeast, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 115-141.
136. Wilcox, D. R., and Shenk, L. O. (1977). The Architecture of the Casa Grande and Its Interpretation, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 115, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
137. Wilcox, D. R., and Sternberg, C. (1983). Hohokam Ball Courts and Their Interpretation, Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series, No. 160, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
138. Wobst, H. M. (1999). Style in archaeology or archaeologists in style. In Chilton, E. S. (ed.), Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture, The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 118-132.
139. Wobst, H. M. (2000). Agency in (spite of ) material culture. In Dobres, M., and Robb, M. A. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 40-50.
140. Yoffee, N., Fish, S. K., and Milner, G. (1999). Comunidades, ritualities, chiefdoms: Social evolution in the American southwest and southeast. In Neitzel, J. E. (ed.), Great Towns and Regional Polities, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 261-271.