Teaching conflict assessment and frame analysis through interactive web-based simulations

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 320-340

  Elliott, Michael ^a   Kaufman, Sanda ^b   Gardner, Robert ^c   Burgess, Guy ^c  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141652810     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022880     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Buechler, S. (2000). Social movements in advanced Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Cobb, S. (2000). Negotiation pedagogy: Learning to learn. Negotiation Journal (Special issue on Negotiation Pedagogy), 16, 315-320.
3. Druckman, D. (2000). Bridging the gap between negotiating experience and analysis. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations (pp. 231-244), Cambridge: PON Books.
4. Elliott, M., Gray, B., & Lewicki, R. (2003). Lessons learned about the framing of intractable environmental conflicts. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 409-436), Washington, DC: Island Press.
5. Elliott, M., & Hanke, R. (2003). Framing effect in toxic disputes: Cross-case analysis. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 333-354), Washington, DC: Island Press.
6. Fortgang, R. (2000). Taking stock: An analysis of negotiation pedgogy across four professional fields. Negotiation Journal (Special Issue on Negotiation Pedagogy), 16, 325-338.
7. Gardner, R., & Burgess, G.(2003). Analysis of Colorado growth conflict frames. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 387-408), Washington, DC: Island Press.
8. Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11-34), Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Gray, B., Peterson, T., Putnam, L., & Bryan, T. (2003). Comparing natural resource cases. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 159-192), Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tverski, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
11. Lewicki, R. (2000). Teaching negotiation and dispute resolution in colleges of business: The state of the practice and challenges for the future. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations (pp. 169-186). Boston: PON Books.
12. Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliott, M. (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases, Washington, DC: Island Press.
13. Lewicki, R., Kaufman, S., Wiethoff, C., & Davis, C. (2003). Comparing water cases. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 255-274), Washington, DC: Island Press.
14. Lowenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2000). The challenge of learning. Negotiation Journal (Special Issue on Negotiation Pedagogy), 16, 399-408.
15. Patton, B. M. (2000). On teaching negotiations. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations (pp. 7-62). Boston: PON Books.
16. Program on Negotiation (2000). Negotiation pedagogy: A research survey of four disciplines. Boston: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
17. Susskind, L. (2000). A better way to teach negotiations. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations (pp. 321-326). Boston: PON Books.
18. Susskind, L., & Cobum, J. (2000). Using simulations to teach negotiations: Pedagogical theory and practice. In M. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations (pp. 285-310). Boston: PON Books.