Modeling selective attention: Not just another model of Stroop (NJAMOS)

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 67-76

  Lovett, Marsha C ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive architectures; Hybrid models; Selective attention; Stroop task

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISION;

EID: 0141629811     PISSN: 13890417     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-0417(01)00045-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson J.R. Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought 1998 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
2. Chen J. Johnson M. The Stroop congruency effect is more observable under a speed strategy than an accuracy strategy Perceptual - Motor Skills 73 1991 67-76
3. Cohen J.D. Dunbar K. McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect Psychological Review 97 1990 332-361
4. Cohen J.D. Huston T.A. Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance In Umilta C. Moscovitch M. (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: conscious and nonconscious information processing 1994 453-476 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
5. Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 239-269.
6. Dalrymple-Alford E.C. Associative facilitation and interference in the Stroop color-word task Perception and Psychophysics 11 1972 274-276
7. Dunbar K. MacLeod C.M. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 1984 622-639
8. Glaser M.O. Glaser W.R. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 8 1982 875-894
9. Levelt W.J.M. Roelofs A. Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production Behavioral - Brain Science 22 1999 1-75
10. Logan G.D. Zbrodoff N.J. Williamson J. Strategies in the color-word Stroop task Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 1984 135-138
11. Lovett, M. C. (2001). Strategic variation in the standard and double-response Stroop task. In preparation.
12. Lovett M.C. Daily L.Z. Reder L.M. A source activation theory of working memory Cognitive Systems Research 1 2000 99-118
13. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review Psychological Bulletin 109 1991 163-203
14. MacLeod C.M. Dunbar K. Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 1988 126-135
15. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition 1990 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
16. Phaf R.H. van der Heijden A.H.C. Hudson P.T.W. SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks Cognitive Psychology 22 1990 273-341
17. Roelofs A. Control of language: a computational account of the Stroop asymmetry Proceedings of the third international conference on cognitive modeling 2000 Universal Press Veenendaal, The Netherlands
18. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 1935 643-662
19. Tzelgov J. Henik A. Berger J. Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words Memory and Cognition 20 1992 727-735