Urban Form, Health, and the Law's Limits

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1395-1399

  Buzbee, William W ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY STANDARD; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; SAFETY; URBAN AREA; ARTICLE; CAR; CITY PLANNING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HEALTH; HOUSING; INDUSTRY; POPULATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; UNITED STATES;

AUTOMOBILES; CITY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HAZARDOUS WASTE; HOUSING; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SUBURBAN POPULATION; TRANSPORTATION; UNITED STATES; URBAN HEALTH;

EID: 0141609918     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1395     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Duany A, Plater-Zyberk E, Speck J. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press; 2000.
2. Michael Gerrard, ed. Brownfields Law & Practice. New York, NY: Lexis Publishing; 2002.
3. Buzbee W.W. Smart growth microincentives and the tree-cut tax case. Georgia State Law Rev. 2001;17:999-1012.
4. Buzbee W.W. Sprawl's dynamics: a comparative institutional analysis critique. Wake Forest Law Rev. 2000;35:509-537.
5. Buzbee W.W. Sprawl's political-economy and the case for a metropolitan green space initiative. Urban Lawyer. 2000;32:367-390.
6. Buzbee W.W. Urban sprawl, federalism, and the problem of institutional complexity. Fordham Law Rev. 1999;68:57-136.
7. Foglesong RE. Planning the Capitalist City: The Colonial Era to the 1920s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1986.
8. Kunstler JH. The City in Mind: Notes on the Urban Condition. New York, NY: The Free Press; 2001.
9. Kay JH. Asphalt Nation: How the Automobile Took Over America and How We Can Take It Back. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1997.
10. Bolick C. Subverting the American dream: government dictated "smart growth" is unwise and unconstitutional. U Pennsylvania Law Rev. 2000;148:859-872.
11. Gillette CP. Regionalization and interlocal bargains. NYU Law Rev. 2001;76:190-271.
12. Ellickson RC, Been VL. Land Use Controls. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Aspen Law & Business; 2000:85-107.
13. Karkkainen BC. Zoning: a reply to the critics. J Land Use Environmental Law. 1994;10:45-89.
14. Haar CM, Wolf MA. Euclid lives: the survival of progressive jurisprudence. Harvard Law Rev. 2002;115:2158-2203.
15. Wolf MA. Fruits of the "impenetrable jungle": navigating the boundary between land-use planning and environmental law. J Urban Contemporary Law. 1996;50:5-93.
16. Freilich RH. From Sprawl to Smart Growth. Chicago, Ill: The American Bar Association; 1999.
17. 42 USC § 7401-7671 (1995 and supp. 2003).
18. 42 USC § 7410 (1995 and supp. 2003).
19. 42 USC § 4321-4370f (1995 and supp. 2003).
20. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, Public L No. 105-178, 112 Stat 107 (1998).
21. 23 USC §§109(j), 134(1) (1995 and Supp 2003).
22. Executive Order 12 898, 59 Federal Register 7629 (1994).
23. Gillette CP, Baker LA. Local Government Law. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Aspen Law & Business; 1999:639-643, 803-816.
24. Nelson AC, Duncan JB. Growth Management Principles and Practices. Chicago, Ill: Planners Press, American Planning Association; 1995.
25. Keohane NO, Revesz RL, Stavins RN. The choice of regulatory instruments in environmental policy. Harvard Environmental Law Rev. 1998;22:313-367