Dynamic sensitivity analysis for the pantograph of a high-speed rail vehicle

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 266, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 235-260

  Park, Tong Jin ^a   Han, Chang Soo ^b   Jang, Jin Hee ^c  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^c Technical Research Center Shinsung Solar Energy   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PANTOGRAPHS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; STIFFNESS MATRIX;

CATENARY SYSTEM; CONTACT FORCE ANALYSIS; HIGH SPEED RAIL VEHICLE; LINEAR SPRING-MASS SYSTEM;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141564895     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01280-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. J.H. Jang, C.S. Han, The state sensitivity analysis of the front wheel steering vehicle: in the time domain, KSME International Journal 11 (1997) 595-604.
2. A. Balestrino, O. Bruno, A. Landi, L. Sani, Innovative solutions for overhead catenary-pantography system: wire actuated control and observed contact force, Vehicle System Dynamic 33 (2000) 69-89.
3. C.N. Jensen, H. True, S. Consult, Dynamic of an electrical overhead line system and moving pantographs, Vehicle System Dynamic 28 (1998) 104-113.
4. D.N. O'Connor, S.D. Eppinger, W.P. Seering, D.N. Wormley, Active control of a high-speed pantograph, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 119 (1997) 1-4.
5. G. Diana, F. Fossati, F. Resta, High speed railway: collecting pantographs active control and overhead lines diagnostic solutions, Vehicle System Dynamic 30 (1998) 69-84.
6. K. Manabe, Periodical dynamic stabilities of a catenary-pantography system, Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute 35 (1994) 112-117.
7. T.X. Wu, M.J. Brennan, Basic analytical study of pantography-catenary system dynamics, Vehicle System Dynamic 30 (1998) 443-456.
8. T.X. Wu, M.J. Brennan, Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph-catenary system dynamics, Journal of Sound and Vibration 219 (1999) 483-502.
9. T. Yagi, A. Stensson, C. Hardell, Simulation and visualization of the dynamic behavior of an overhead power system with contact breaking, Vehicle System Dynamic 25 (1996) 31-49.
10. T. Vinayagalingam, Computer evaluation of controlled pantographs for current collection from simple catenary overhead equipment at high speed, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement, and Control 105 (1983) 287-294.
11. J.R. Ockendon, A.B. Tayor, The dynamics of a current collection system for an electric locomotive, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 211 (1971) 336-357.
12. E.J. Haug, V.N. Sohoni, Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of kinematically driven systems, in: E.J. Haug (Ed.), Computer Aided Analysis and Optimization of Mechanical System Dynamics, NATO ASI Series F: Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 9, Springer, Berlin, pp. 499-554.
13. C.N. Vanderplaats, Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design with Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984.
14. J.S. Arora, Introduction to Optimum Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.