Fitness heterogeneity and viability of restored populations

Animal Conservation

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 153-161

  Robert, Alexandre ^a   Couvet, Denis ^b   Sarrazin, François ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; EXTINCTION; FITNESS; GENETICS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 0141508390     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1367943002002214     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boyce, M. S. (1992). Population viability analysis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 481-506.
2. Bustamante, J. (1996). Population viability analysis of captive and released bearded vulture populations. Conserv. Biol. 10: 822-831.
3. Bustamante, J. (1998). Use of simulation models to plan species reintroductions: the case of the bearded vulture in southern Spain. Anim. Conserv. 1: 229-238.
4. Caswell, H. (2001). Matrix population models. Second edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
5. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
6. Couvet, D. & Ronfort, J. (1994). Mutation load depending on reproductive success and mating system. In Conservation genetics: 55-68. Loeschcke, V., Tomiuk, J. & Jain, S.K. (Eds). Basel: Birkhaüser Verlag.
7. Crow, J. F. (1993). Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology 9: 3-42.
8. Ferrière, R., Sarrazin, F., Legendre, S. & Baron, J. P. (1996). Matrix population models applied to viability analysis and conservation: theory and practice using ULM software. Acta Oecologica 6: 629-656.
9. Frankham, R., Hemmer, H., Ryder, D. A., Cothran, E. G., Soulé, M. E., Murray, N. D. & Snyder, M. (1986). Selection in captive populations. Zoo. Biol. 5: 171-180.
10. Gilpin, M. E. & Soulé, M. E. (1986). Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Soulé, M. E. (Ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
11. Griffith, B., Scott, J. M., Carpenter, J. W. & Reed, C. (1989). Translocations as a species conservation tool: status and strategies. Science 245: 477-480.
12. Hedrick, P. W. (1994). Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
13. Hedrick, P. W. & Miller, P. S. (1992). Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol. Applic 2: 30-46.
14. Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Lacy, R. C. (1989). Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. Zoo Biol. 8 111-123.
16. Lande, R. (1988). Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455-1460.
17. Lande, R. (1995) Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9 882-891.
18. Legendre, S. & Clobert, J. (1995). ULM, Unified Life Models, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists. J. of Appl. Statist. 22: 817-834.
19. Legendre, S., Clobert, J., Møller, A. P. & Sorci, G. (1999). Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand. Am. Nat. 153: 449-453.
20. Lynch, M. (1991). The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
21. Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D., Kibota, T., Schultz, S., Vassilieva, L. & Willis, J. (1999). Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53: 645-663.
22. Lynch, M., Bürger, R., Butcher, D. & Gabriel, W. (1993). The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J. Hered. 84: 339-344.
23. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Bürger, R. (1995a). Mutational meltdown in sexual populations. Evolution 49: 1067-1080.
24. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Bürger, R. (1995b). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489-518.
25. Lynch, M. & Gabriel, W. (1990). Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44: 1725-1737.
26. May, R. (1991). The role of ecological theory in planning reintroduction of endangered species. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 62: 145-163.
27. Montalvo, A. M. & Ellstrand, N. C. (2000). Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1034-1045.
28. Roff, D. A. (1998). Evolutionary quantitative genetics. New York: Chapman & Hall.
29. Rogers, A. & Prügel-Bennett, A. (2000). Evolving populations with overlapping generations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57: 121-129.
30. Sarrazin, F. & Legendre, S. (2000). Demographic approach to releasing adults versus young in reintroductions. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1-14.
31. Simmons, M. J. & Crow, J. F. (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11: 49-78.
32. Templeton, A. (1986). Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In Conservation biology: 105-116. Soulé, M. (Ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
33. Tordoff, H. B. & Redig, P. T. (2001). Role of genetic background in the success of reintroduced peregrine falcons. Conserv. Biol. 15 528-532.
34. Wolf, C. M., Griffith, B., Reed, C. & Temple, A. (1996). Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1142-1154.