A TQM approach to HR performance evaluation criteria

European Management Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 323-337

  Soltani, Ebrahim ^a   Van Der Meer, Robert ^a   Gennard, John ^a   Williams, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Effectiveness of HR performance evaluation; Total quality management; TQM driven HR performance evaluation system

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141465262     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00052-5     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Angel A. Evaluating employees by computer Personnel Administrator November 1989 67-72
2. Antonioni D. The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings Personnel Psychology 47 1994 349-356
3. Ashkenas R. Ulrich D. Jick T. Kerr S. The Boundaryless Organisation: Breaking The Chain of Organisational Structure 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
4. Beardwell I. Holden L. Human Resource Management 1997 Pitman Publishing London
5. Berry L. Parasuraman A. Marketing Services: Competing Through Quality 1991 Free Press New York
6. Bowen, D.E. and Waldman, D.A. (1999) Customer-driven employee performance. In The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development, Ilgen, D.R. and Pulakos, E.D. (eds) Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA pp. 154-191.
7. Bowman J.S. At last, an alternative to performance appraisal: total quality management Public Administration Review 45 2 1994 129-136
8. Campbell D.J. Lee C. Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: development versus The Academy of Management Review 13 2 1988 302-313
9. Campbell J.P. Modelling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organisational psychology Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology eds Dunnette M.D. Hough L.M. 1990 687-732 Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA
10. Cardy B. Dobbins G. The changing face of performance appraisal: customer evaluations and 360 appraisal Human Resources Division News 16 1993 17-18
11. Cardy R.L. Performance appraisal in a quality context: a new look at an old problem Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice ed Smither J.W. 1998 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
12. Cardy R.L. Carson K.P. Total quality and abandonment of performance appraisal: taking a good thing too far? Journal of Quality Management 1 1996 193-206
13. Cardy R.L. Sutton C.L. Carson K.P. Dobbins G.H. Person and system effects in performance appraisal: Ratings as a function of the degree of performance responsibility and errorfulness Journal of Quality Management 3 1 1998 79-99
14. Carroll S.J. Schneier C.E. Performance Appraisal and Review Systems: The identification of Measurement and Development of Performance in Organisations 1982 Scott, Foresman Glenview, IL
15. Dean J.W. Bowen D.E. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development Academy of Management Review 19 3 1994 392-418
16. Deming W.E. Out of Crisis 1986 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Advanced Engineering Study Cambridge
17. Dobbins G.H. Cardy R.L. Carson K.P. Examining fundamental assumptions: a contrast of person and system approaches to human resource management Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 3 1991 1-38
18. Fenton O'Creevy M. Employee involvement and the middle manager: evidence from a survey of organisations Journal of Organisational Behaviour 19 1998 67-84
19. Fisher C.D. Schoenfeldt L.F. Shaw J.B. Human Resource Management 3rd edn 1996 Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, MA
20. Fletcher, C. (1993) Appraisal: an idea whose time has gone? Personnel Management September, 34-36.
21. Garavan T.N. Morley M. Flynn M. 360 degree feedback: its role in employee development Journal of Management Development 16 2 1997 134-147
22. Ghorpade J. Lackritz J.R. Influence behind neutral response in subordinate ratings of supervisors: a methodological note Personnel Psychology 34 1981 511-522
23. Ghorpade J. Chen M.M. Caggiano J. Creating quality-driven performance appraisal systems The Academy of Management Executive 9 1 1995 32-40
24. Hackman J.R. Wageman R. Total quality management: empirical, conceptual, and practical issues Administrative Science Quarterly 40 309 1995 309-342
25. Hauenstein N.M.A. Training raters to increase the accuracy of appraisals and the usefulness of feedback Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice ed Smither J.W. 1998 405-441 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
26. Hunter J.E. Hunter R.F. Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance Psychology Bulletin 96 1984 72-98
27. Ilgen D.R. Performance appraisal accuracy: an elusive and sometimes misguided goal Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organisational Perspectives eds H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & M. Smith, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
28. Ishikawa K. What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way 1985 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
29. Juran J.M. Juran on Leadership for Quality 1989 Free Press New York
30. Kaisen Ltd. Motivating with ten commandments Management Services 45 11 2001 4-6
31. Katzell R.A. Guzzo R.A. Psychological approaches to productivity improvement American Psychologist 38 1983 468-472
32. Kingstrom, P. O. and Mainstone, L. E. (1985) An investigation of rater/ratee acquaintance and rater bias. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 641-653.
33. Latham G.P. Wexley K.N. Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal 2nd edn 1994 Addison Wesley Longman Reading, MA
34. Locke E.A. Schweiger D.M. Participation in decision making: one more look Research in Organisational Behaviour 1 1979 256-339
35. London, M. and Beatty R. (1993) Introduction to special issue on 360 degree feedback. Human Resource Management 32, 353-372.
36. Long P. Performance Appraisal Revised 1986 London Institute of Personnel Management
37. Mahew B.H. Hierarchical differentiation in improving coordinated associations Research in the Sociology of organisations Vol. 2 ed Bacharach S. 1983 JAI Press Greenwich, CT
38. McEvoy G.M. Buller P.F. User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting Personnel Psychology 40 1987 785-797
39. Meyer H. Self-appraisal of job performance Personnel Psychology 33 1980 291-295
40. Moen R.D. The performance appraisal system: Deming's deadly disease Quality Progress 22 1989 62-66
41. Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G. P. and Sorcher, M. (1993) Other people's expectations. Human Resource Management 32, 283-297.
42. Murphy K.R. Cleveland J.N. Performance Appraisal: An Organisational Perspective 1991 Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA
43. Murphy K.R. Cleveland J.N. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organisational, and Goal-based Perspectives 1995 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
44. O'Reilly B. 360 Feedback can change your life Fortune October 1994 67-72
45. Oakland J.S. Total Quality Management 1989 Heinemann London
46. Randell G.A. Employee appraisal Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice in Britain ed Sisson K. 1994 Blackwell Oxford
47. Redman T. Snape E. Upward and onward; can staff appraise their managers? Personnel Review 21 1992 32-46
48. Reeves C.A. Bednar D.A. Defining quality: alternatives and implications Academy of Management Review 19 3 1994 419-445
49. Scherkenbach, W.W. (1985) Performance appraisal and Quality: Ford's new philosophy. Quality Progress, (April) 40-46.
50. Scholtes P.R. Total quality or performance appraisal: choose one National Productivity Review 12 3 1993 349-363
51. Scholtes, P.R. (1995) Performance Appraisal: Obsolete and harmful, Quality Magazine, pp.66-70.
52. Seddon, J. (2001) Performance a miracle: praise the workers. The Observer, 11 March: www.lean-service.com.
53. Segella L.J. Kiss appraisal woes goodbye Supervisory Management 34 1989 24
54. Simon S.K.L. Schaubroeck J. Total quality management and performance appraisal: an experimental study of process versus results and group versus individual approaches Journal of Organisational Behaviour 20 4 1999 445-457
55. Smith P.C. Kendall L.M. Retranslation of expectations: an approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales Journal of Applied Psychology 47 1963 149-155
56. Smither J.W. Lessons learned: research implications for performance appraisal and management practice Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice ed, Smither J.W. 1998 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA
57. Sonny S.A. Employee involvement as a prerequisite to reduce workers' compensation costs: a case study Review of Business 23 2 2002 12-16
58. Strebler, M. T., Robinson, D. and Bevan, S. (2001) Performance review: balancing objective and content, IES (The Institute for Employment Studies) Report 370, February.
59. Thornton III G.C. Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of performance Personnel Psychology 33 1980 263-271
60. Tim W.M. Employee participation: a vehicle for safety by design Occupational Hazards 64 5 2002 71-76
61. Torrington D. Hall L. Human Resource Management 4th edn 1998 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
62. Townley B. Selection and appraisal: reconstituting 'social relations'? New Perspectives on Human Resource Management ed, Storey J. 1991 92-108 Routledge London
63. US Department of Labour Dictionary of Occupational Titles 4th edn 1991 US Governmental Printing Office Washington, DC
64. Vivian D.A. Performance-based rewards, line-of-sight foster ownership behaviour in staff Canadian HR Reporter 14 17 2001 10-11
65. Waldman D.A. The contributions of total quality management to a theory of work performance Academy of Management Review 19 1994 510-536
66. Wexley K.N. Klimoski R. Performance appraisal: an update Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management eds, Rowland K.M. Ferris G.R. 1984 35-80 JAI Press Greenwich, CT
67. Wiese D.S. Buckley M.R. The evolution of the performance appraisal process Journal of Management History 4 3 1998 233-244
68. Wilkinson A. Redman T. Snape E. Marchington M. Managing with Total Quality Management 1998 McMillan Press London
69. Williams R. Alternative raters and methods Assessment and Selection in Organisations ed, Herriot P. 1989 725-736 John Wiley Chichester
70. Yoshida K. Deming management philosophy: does it work in the U.S. as well as in Japan? Columbia Journal of World Business Fall 1989 10-17
71. Zobal C. The ideal team compensation system - an overview: part I Team Performance Measurement 14 5 1998 235-249