Shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets cemented to bovine enamel with composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cements

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 263-269

  Titley, Keith C ^a,b   Mahal, Raj Deep ^a,b   Rossouw, P Emile ^a,b   Kulkarni, Gajanan V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Department of Orthodontics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cements; Long term storage; Orthodontic brackets; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DRUG STORAGE; ENAMEL; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DRUG STORAGE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0141462685     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. Toronto, Canada: The CV Mosby Company; 1993:347-357.
2. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling material to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849-853.
3. Newman CV, Snyder WH, Wilson CE. Acrylic adhesives for bonding attachments to tooth surfaces. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:12-18.
4. Newman CV. Bonding plastic orthodontic attachments. J Pract Orthod. 1969;3:231-338.
5. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
6. Urabe H, Rossouw PE, Titley K, Yamin C. Combinations of etchants, composite resins, and bracket systems: An important choice in orthodontic bonding procedures. Angle Orthod. 1998;69:267-275.
7. Sharma-Sayal SK. The influence of bracket base designs on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to bovine enamel [thesis]. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto; 1999.
8. Coups Smith KS. The relationship between bond strength and bonding agent when resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements are used to bond orthodontic attachments to enamel [thesis]. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto; 1997.
9. Regan D, van Noort R. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil mesh. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:144-153.
10. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch treatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
11. Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear bond strength of dental composite to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 1998;43:305-311.
12. Rueggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1991;7:2-10.
13. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:276-281.
14. Bishara SE, Khowassah MA, Oesterle LJ. Effect of humidity and temperature changes on orthodontic direct bonding systems. J Dent Res. 1975;54:751-758.
15. Low T, von Fraunhofer JA. The direct use of composite materials in adhesive dentistry. Brit Dent J. 1976;141:207-213.
16. Johnson WT, Hembree JH, Weber FN. Shear strength of orthodontic direct bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:559-566.
17. Yamaguchi R, Powers JM, Dennison JB. Parameters affecting in vitro bond strength of composites to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 1989;5:153-156.
18. Meng CL, TarngTH, Luo YC, Lai JS, Arvystas MG. Orthodontic resin under water immersion. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:209-214.
19. Chamda RA, Stein E. Time-related bond strengths of light cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110:378-382.
20. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass Ionomer Cement. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1988.
21. O'Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJF. Residual debris and bond strength-is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:222-230.
22. Keiser S, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:18-27.
23. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater. 1992;8:265-259.
24. Ostman-Andersson E, Marcusson A, Horstedt P. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface after debonding following the use of glass ionomer cement and acrylic resins for bracket bonding. Sived Dent J. 1993;17:139-146.
25. Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod. 1996;17:449.
26. White LW. Glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod. 1986;20:387-391.
27. Fox NA. Fluoride release from orthodontic bonding materials: an in vitro study. Brit J Orthod. 1990; 7:293-298.
28. Ashcroft DB, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. Fluoride release and shear bond strength of three light-cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:260-265.
29. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J. 1991;15:253-258.
30. Creanor SL, Carruthers LMC, Saunders WP, Strang R, Foye RH. Fluoride uptake and release characteristics of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 1994;28:322-328.
31. Forss H, Seppa L. Prevention of enamel demineral-ization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:173-178.
32. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Caries associated in microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res. 1992;100:140-143.
33. Wright AB, Lee RT, Lynch E, Young KA. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:469-475.