Combinations of etchants, composite resins, and bracket systems: An important choice in orthodontic bonding procedures

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 267-275

  Urabe, H ^a   Rossouw, P E ^a   Titley, K C ^a   Yamin, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acid concentrations; Orthodontic bonding

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; DENTAL ALLOY; MALEIC ACID; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; PLASTIC; RESIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; ENAMEL; GEL; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; GELS; INCISOR; MALEATES; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PLASTICS; SOLUTIONS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0033146498     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. Toronto: Mosby, 1986.
2. Sinclair PM. The reader's corner. Editorial. J Cli Orthod, 1991;25(9):555-557.
3. Newman GV. Bonding plastic orthodontic attachments to tooth enamel. J NJ State Dent Soc 1964;346-358.
4. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Brit J Orthod 1975;2(3):171-178.
5. Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Boyer DB, Jakobsen JR. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109(4):403-409.
6. Maijer R, Smith DC Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Amer J Orthod 1981;79(1):20-34.
7. Smith NR, Reynolds IR. A comparison of three bracket bases: An in vitro study. Brit J Orthod 1991;18(1):29-35.
8. MacColl, G. The relationship between bond strength and base surface area using conventional and micro-etched bases (thesis). Toronto: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, University of Toronto, 1995.
9. Gorelick L. Bonding/The state of the art: A national survey. J Clin Orthod 1979;13(1):39-53.
10. Gottlieb EW, Nelson AH, Vogels DS III. 1990 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures: Part I. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod 1991;25(3):145-156.
11. Ødegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94(3):201-206.
12. Gwinnett AJ. A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93(4):346-348.
13. Harris AMP, Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic resins to ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24(12):725-728.
14. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;97(2): 121-125.
15. Forsberg CM, Hagberg C. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. Brit J Orthod 1992;19(3):183-189.
16. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;104(2) 170-179.
17. Wiltshire WA, Janse van Rensberg SD. Fluoride release from four visible light-cured orthodontic adhesive resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108(3): 278-283.
18. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108(3):231-236.
19. Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100(3): 251-258.
20. Winchester LJ. A comparison between the old Transcend and the new Transcend series 2000 bracket. Brit J Orthod 1992;19(2):109-116.
21. Blalock KA, Powers JM. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107(6):596-603.
22. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-853.
23. Relief DH. The use of 50 per cent phosphoric acid as an etching agent in orthodontics: A rational approach. Am J Orthod. 1975;68(2):165-178.
24. Gottlieb EW, Retief DH, Jamison HC. An optimal concentration of phosphoric acid as an etching agent. Part I: Tensile bond strength studies. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48(1):48-51.
25. Zidan O, Hill G. Phosphoric acid concentration: Enamel surface loss and bonding strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55(3):388-392.
26. Carstensen VV. Clinical effects of reduction of acid concentration on direct bonding of brackets. Angle Orthod 1993; 63(3):221-224.
27. 4 concentration on bond strength. Angle Orthod 1994;46(5):377-382.
28. Mardaga WJ, Shannon IL. Decreasing the depth of etch for direct bonding in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1982;16(2):130-132.
29. Legier LR, Rerief DH, Bradley EL, Denys FR, Sadowsky PL. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;96(6):485-492.
30. Sadowsky PL, Relief DH, Cox PR, Hernandez-Orsini R, Rape WG, Bradley EL. Effects of etchant concentration and duration on the retention of orthodontic brackets: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98(5): 417-421.
31. Wang WN, Lu TC. Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100(1):72-79.
32. Sheen DH, Wang WN, Tarng TH. Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with various etching times. Angle Orthod 1993;63(3):225-230.
33. Swift EJ, Cloe BC. Shear bond strengths of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent 1993;6(3):162-164.
34. Garcia-Godoy F, Martin S. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel. J Clin Ped Dent 1995;19(3):181-183.
35. Mizrahi E, Smith DC. Direct attachment of orthodontic brackets to dental enamel: A preliminary clinical report. Brit Dent J. 1971;130:392-396.
36. Smith DC, Cartz L. Crystalline interface formed by polyacrylic acid and tooth enamel. J Dent Res. 1973;52(5):1155.
37. Maijer R, Smith DC. A new surface treatment for bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:975-985.
38. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85(4):333-340.
39. Rueggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure: Review of the literature. Dent Mater 1991;7:2-10.
40. Jeiroudi MT. Enamel fracture caused by ceramic brackets: A case report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;99(2):97-99.
41. Machen DE. Legal aspects of orthodontic practice: Risk management concepts, ceramic bracket update. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98(2):185-186.
42. Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98(4)348-353.
43. Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988;22(2):82-85.
44. Hermsen RJ, Vrijhoef MMA. Loss of enamel due to etching with phosphoric or maleic acid. Dent Mater. 1993; 9:332-336.
45. Urabe H. The effect of different acid conditioning agents on metal, ceramic, and polycarbonate brackets bonded to bovine enamel (thesis). Toronto: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, University of Toronto, 1996.
46. Weast RC, editor. Handbook of chemistry and physics. Cleveland: CRC Press, B-78, 1974.
47. Chow LC, Brown WE. Phosphoric acid conditioning of teeth for pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res 1973;52(5):1158.
48. Soetopo D, Beech DR, Hardwick JL. Mechanism of adhesion of polymers to acid-etched enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:69-79.
49. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 1992;8:265-269.
50. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study. Part I and Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:145-153, 263-273.
51. Maskeroni AJ, Meyers CE, Lorton L. Ceramic bracket bonding: A comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid conditioning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;97(2):168-175.
52. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: An in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108(3):284-293.
53. Fitzpatric DA, Way DC The effects of wear, acid etching, and bond removal on human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1997;72(6):671-681.