Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts

Quintessence International

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 534-536

  Chandler, Nicholas P ^a   Qualtrough, Alison J E ^b   Purton, David G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endodontic retreatment; Root canal post; Trephine burs; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

RESIN; TITANIUM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; TOOTH ROOT CANAL; ULTRASOUND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CUSPID; DENTAL DEBONDING; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TITANIUM; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0141426600     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AGB, Käyser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-284.
2. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment: Post removal simplified. Dent Today 1998;17(5):48-50,52-53.
3. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993;38:39-45.
4. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy of dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14:200-204.
5. Purton DG, Chandler NP, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of root canal posts. Br Dent J 1998;184:294-296.
6. Stokes AN, Hood JAA, Chandler NP. A light cured resin for precision plastic dowels and cores. Quintessence Int 1989;20:599-601.
7. Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts. Oper Dent 2000;25:223-227.
8. Masserann J. Entfernen metallischer Fragmente aus Wurzelkanälen. J Br Endod Soc 1971;5:55-59.
9. Williams VD, Bjorndal AM. The Masserann technique for the removal of fractured posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:46-48.
10. Gaffney JL, Lehman JW, Miles MJ. Expanded use of the ultrasonic scaler. J Endod 1981;7:228-229.
11. Krell KV, Jordan RD, Madison S, Aquilino S. Using ultrasonic scalers to remove fractured root posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:46-49.
12. Bergeron BE, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, Walker WA. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal. J Endod 2001;27:13-17.
13. Johnson WJ, Leary JM, Boyer DB. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth. J Endod 1996;22:487-488.
14. Gomes APM, Kubo CH, Santos RAB, Santos DR, Padilha RQ. The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents. Int Endod J 2001;34:93-99.
15. Sattherthwaite JD, Stokes AN, Frankel NTN. Potential for temperature change during application of ultrasonic vibration to intra-radicular posts. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent (in press).
16. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-405.
17. Gutmann JL, Dumsha TC, Lovdahl PE, Hovland EJ. Problem Solving in Endodontics, ed 3. St Louis: Mosby, 1997:191,193.