Impact forces cannot explain the one-target advantage in rapid aimed hand movements

Human Movement Science

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 365-376

  Biegstraaten, Marianne ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a   Brenner, Eli ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Impact force; Motor control; One target advantage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FINGER; FORCE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; VELOCITY;

BIOMECHANICS; HAND; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0043288085     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00050-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adam J.J. Helsen W.F. Elliott D. Buekers M.J. The one-target advantage in the control of rapid aiming movements: The effect of practice Journal of Human Movement Studies 41 2001 301-313
2. Adam J.J. Niewenstein J.H. Huys R. Paas F.G.W.C. Kingma H. Willems P. Werry M. Control of rapid aimed hand movements: The one-target advantage Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 2000 295-312
3. Adam J.J. van der Bruggen D.P.W. Bekkering H. The control of discrete and reciprocal target-aiming responses: Evidence for the exploitation of mechanics Human Movement Sciences 12 1993 353-364
4. Adam J. van Loon E.M. Paas F.G.W.C. Drost M.R. van Dongen M.M.J. Kodde R. Impact forces of one- and two-element target-aiming responses Human Movement Science 16 1997 369-377
5. Chamberlin C.J. Magill R.A. Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60 1989 256-267
6. Christina R.W. Fischman M.G. Lambert A.L. Moore J.F. Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Christina et al. (1982) revisited Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 56 1985 316-322
7. Fischman M. Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction Journal of Motor Behavior 16 1984 405-423
8. Fischman M.G. Reeve T.G. Slower movement times may not necessarily imply on-line programming Journal of Human Movement Studies 22 1992 131-144
9. Flash T. Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model Journal of Neuroscience 5 1985 1688-1703
10. Guiard Y. On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming Acta Psychologica 82 1993 139-159
11. Helsen W.F. Adam J.J. Elliott D. Buekers M.J. The one-target advantage: A test of the movement integration hypothesis Human Movement Sciences 20 2001 643-674
12. Lajoie J.M. Franks I.M. Response programming as a function of accuracy and complexity: Evidence from latency and kinematic measures Human Movement Sciences 16 1997 485-505
13. Smeets J.B.J. Brenner E. A new view on grasping Motor Control 3 1999 237-271
14. Smeets J.B.J. Frens M.A. Brenner E. Throwing darts: Timing is not the limiting factor Experimental Brain Research 144 2002 268-274
15. Smiley-Oyen A.L. Worringham C.J. Peripheral constraint versus on-line programming in rapid aimed sequential movements Acta Psychologica 108 2001 219-245
16. Teasdale N. Schmidt R.A. Deceleration requirements and the control of pointing movements Journal of Motor Behavior 23 1991 131-138