Effect of drying type and drying conditions over fermentative ability of brewer's yeast

Journal of Food Process Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 135-147

  Luna Solano, G ^a   Salgado Cervantes, M A ^a   Ramirez Lepe, M ^a   Garcia Alvarado, M A ^a   Rodriguez Jimenes, Guadalupe C ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE VERACRUZ   (Mexico)

^b NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREWERIES; CELLS; DEHYDRATION; DRYING; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FLUIDIZED BEDS; GLUCOSE; REACTION KINETICS;

REHYDRATION;

YEAST;

EID: 0043269924     PISSN: 01458876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2003.tb00593.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ATKINSON, A.C. and HUNTER, W.G. 1968. The design of experiment for parameter estimation. Technometrics 10(2), 271-289.
2. ATKINSON, B. and MADITUNA, F. 1991. Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology Handbook, Second Ed. Chapt. 5, pp. 170-191, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.
3. BHANDARI, B.R. 1992. Etude du procédé de séchage par pulvérisation Leaflash pour les produits alimentaires. Ph.D. Thesis, p. 161, ENSIA-Massy, France.
4. BRODERICK, H.M. 1977. The Practical Brewers Master, Ed. (MBAA) pp. 203-230, Madison, Wisconsin.
5. DIZY, M. and POLO, M.C. 1996. Changes in concentration of nitrogenous compounds during fermentation of white grape musts at pilot plant scale. Food Sci. Technol. Intern. 2, 87-93.
6. FELS, S., RECKELBUS, B. and GOSSELIN, Y. 1999. Dried Yeasts. A truly multifunctional product. J. Brewing Biotechnol. 3, 17-20.
7. FORREST, I.S. 1996. The use of ultrasonics for in-line measurement in beer and wort. J. Brewing Biotechnol. 1, 51-54.
8. GARCIA, A.I., GARCIA, L.A. and DIAZ, M. 1994. Análisis de las Condiciones de Inoculación en la Fermentatión de Cerveza. Cerveza Malta 4, 26-37.
9. GOSSELIN, Y. 1998. Fermentation characteristics from dried ale and lager yeast. J. Brewing Biotechnol. 1, 17-26.
10. GRABOWSKI, S., RAMASWAMY, H.S., MUJUMDAR, A.S. and STRUMILLO C. 1996. Comparison of fluidized and spouted bed drying of baker's yeast. Drying 96, B, pp. 785-792, Krakow, Poland.
11. HENSCHKE, P. 1991. Assessment of active died yeast and the importance of viability. Wine Industry J. Nov. 295-296.
12. HOUGH, J.S. 1990. Biotechnology of Beer and Malt, Ed. pp. 109-156, Acribia, Zaragoza, Spain.
13. LABUZA, T.P., LE ROUX, J.P., FAN, T.S. and TANNENBAUM, S.R. 1970. Engineering factors in single-cell protein production. Spray drying and cell viability. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 12, 135-140.
14. LIEVENSE, L.C. and VAN, R.K. 1993. Convective Drying of Bacteria. Adv. Biochemical Eng. 50, 46-60.
15. LUNA, S.G., SALGADO, C.M.A., GARCIA, A.M.A. and RODRIGUEZ, J.G. 1998. Yeast Viability (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) dried by fluidized bed and spray drying. Drying '98, Vol. C, pp. 18-21, (IDS) Halkidiki, Greece.
16. LUNA, S.G., SALGADO, C.M.A., GARCIA, A.M.A. and RODRIGUEZ, J.G. 2000. Improved viability of spray dried brewer's yeast by using starch (grits) and maltodextrin as processing aids. J. Food Process Engineering 23, 453-462.
17. MILLER, G.I. 1959. Use of acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analitical Chem. 31, 426-428.
18. PAALME, T., ELKEN, R., VILU, R. and KORHOLA, M. 1997. Growth efficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose/ethanol media with a smooth change in the dilution rate (A-stat). Enzyme Microbial Technol. 20, 174-181.
19. VAN, N., VERLINDEN, V. and DEBOURG, A. 1997. La Levure en Fermentation: Impact des nouvelles technologies. J. Brewing Biotechnol. 4, 29-36.