Visualization schemes for domain novices exploring a topic space: The navigation classification scheme

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 923-940

  Leide, John E ^a   Large, Andrew ^a   Beheshti, Jamshid ^a   Brooks, Martin ^b   Cole, Charles ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Charles Cutter; Classification; Information retrieval; Navigation; Undergraduates

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); VISUALIZATION;

CHARLES CUTTER;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0043267614     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00077-8     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aboud M., Chrisment C., Razouk R., Sedes F., Soule-Dupuy C. Querying a hypertext information retrieval system by the use of classification. Information Processing and Management. 29:1993;387-396.
2. Allan J., Leuski A., Swan R., Byrd D. Evaluating combinations of ranked lists and visualizations of inter-document similarity. Information Processing and Management. 37:2001;435-458.
3. Atlas of Cyberspace. Available: www.cybergeography.org/atlas (accessed July 13, 2002).
4. Bates M.J. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review. 13(5):1989;407-424.
5. Belkin N.J., Chang S., Downs T., Saracevic T., Zhao S. Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs. Information in the Year 2000: from research to cooperation. Proceedings of the 53rd ASIS annual meeting. 1990;69-79 Learned Information, Inc, Medford, NJ.
6. Berger F.C., van Bommel P., van der Weide T.P. Ranking strategies for navigation based query formulation. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems. 12(1):1999;5-25.
7. Bookstein A. Information retrieval: a sequential learning process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 34(5):1983;331-342.
8. Brajnik G., Mizzaro S., Tasso C., Venuti F. Strategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(5):2002;343-358.
9. Brooks M., Campbell J. Interactive graphical queries for bibliographic search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;814-825.
10. Card S.K., Mackinlay J.D., Shneiderman B. Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. 1999;Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
11. Carlsen J.R., Kacmar C.J. Increasing link marker effectiveness for WWW and other hypermedia interfaces: an examination of end-user preferences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;386-398.
12. Chen C. Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51:2000;529-542.
13. Cole C. Intelligent information retrieval: part IV. Testing the timing of two information retrieval devices in a natural setting. Information Processing and Management. 37:2001;163-182.
14. Cole C., Cantero P., Sauve D. Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need. Part II. Uncertainty expansion in a prototype of a diagnostic IR tool. Information Processing and Management. 34:1998;721-737.
15. Cole, C., & Leide, J. (in press). Using the user's mental model to guide integration of information space into information need. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
16. Cole, C., Leide, J. E., Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Brooks, M. (in preparation). Navigating the Web.
17. Cole C., Mandelblatt B., Stevenson J. Visualizing a high recall search strategy output for undergraduates in an exploration stage of researching a term paper. Information Processing and Management. 38:2002;37-54.
18. Cutter C.A. Rules for a dictionary catalog. 3rd ed. 1876/1904;Government Printing Office, Washington.
19. Cutter C.A. Expansive classification: Part 1: The first six classifications. 1891-93;Cutter, Boston, MA.
20. Cutting, D. R., Karger, D. R., Pedersen, J. O., & Tukey, J. W. (1992). Scatter/gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 318-329).
21. van Dijk T.A., Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. 1983;Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
22. Dillon A. Spatial-semantics: how users derive shape from information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51:2000;521-528.
23. Domanovsky A. Functions and objects of author and title cataloguing: a contribution to cataloguing theory. 1975;Verlag Dokumentation, Munchen.
24. Dourish, P., & Chalmers, M. (1994). Running out of space: models of information navigation. In Proceedings of HCI'94. Available: http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/̃matthew/papers/hci94.pdf (accessed July 12, 2002).
25. Efthimiadis E.N. Interactive query expansion: a user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(11):2000;989-1003.
26. Fischer, G., Henninger, S., & Redmiles, D. (1991). Intertwining query construction and relevance evaluation. In CHI'91 Conference Proceedings (pp. 55-62).
27. Ford N. Cognitive styles and virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51:2000;543-557.
28. Gelernter, D. (2002). Bold new look, tired old metaphor. The New York Times, Friday, January 11, 2002, p. A23.
29. Harnad S. Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition. 1987;Cambridge University Press, New York.
30. Hearst M.A. Interfaces for searching the web. Scientific American. 276(3):1997;68-72.
31. Hearst M.A. User interfaces and visualization. Ricardo B.-Y., Berthier R.-N. Modern Information Retrieval. 1999;257-323 ACM Press, New York.
32. Hearst, M. A., & Pedersen, J. O. (1996). Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In SIGIR'96 (pp. 76-84).
33. Heo M., Hirtle S.C. An empirical comparison of visualization tools to assist information retrieval on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 52:2001;666-675.
34. Hert C.A., Jacob E.K., Dawson P. A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(11):2000;971-988.
35. Hjorland B. Information seeking and subject representation: an activity-theoretical approach to information science. 1997;Greenwood Press, Westport, CO.
36. Iivonen M., Sonnenwald D.H. From translation to navigation of different discourses: a model of search term selection during the pre-online stage of the search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49:1998;312-326.
37. Information Visualization Resources. Available: www.cs.man.ac.uk/̃ngg/InfoViz/ (accessed February 20, 2002).
38. Koenemann, J., & Belkin, N. J. (1996). A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 205-212).
39. Leide, J. E., Cole, C., Large, A., & Beheshti, J. (submitted for publication). Collocating information in the user's mind's eye: Cutter and beyond.
40. Leuski, A., & Allan, J. (2000). Improving interactive retrieval by combining ranked lists and clustering. In Proceedings of RIAO'2000 (pp. 665-681).
41. Lin X. Map displays for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48:1997;40-54.
42. Mani I., Bloedorn E. Summarizing similarities and differences among related documents. Information Retrieval. 1:1999;35-67.
43. Milstead J.L. Needs for research in indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45:1994;577-582.
44. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. Winston P. The Psychology of Computer Vision. 1975;211-277 McGraw-Hill, New York.
45. Mukherjea, S., Foley, J., & Hudson, S. (1995). Visualizing complex hypermedia networks through multiple hierarchical views. In CHI'95. Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems.
46. Nowell, L. T., France, R. K., Hix, D., Heath, L. S., & Fox, E. A. (1996). Visualizing search results: some alternatives to query-document similarity. In SIGIR'96 (pp. 67-75).
47. O'Day, V. L., & Jeffries, R. (1993). Orienteering in an information landscape: how information seekers get from here to there. In INTERCHI'93. Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 438-445).
48. Pirolli P., Card S. Information foraging. Psychological Review. 106(4):1999;643-675.
49. Rorvig M. Images of similarity: a visual exploration of optimal similarity metrics and scaling properties of TREC topic-document sets. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;639-651.
50. Rosenfeld L., Morville P. Information architecture for the World Wide Web. 1998;O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.
51. Roussinov D.G., Chen H. Information navigation on the web by clustering and summarizing query results. Information Processing and Management. 37:2001;789-816.
52. Salton G., Buckley C. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41:1990;288-297.
53. Savage-Knepshield P.A., Belkin N.J. Interaction in information retrieval: trends over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;1067-1082.
54. Shneiderman B., Byrd D., Croft W.B. Clarifying search: a user-interface framework for text searches. D-Lib Magazine. 1997.
55. Simon H.A. The sciences of the artificial. 1969;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Small H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;799-813.
57. Suchman L.A. Plans and situated actions: the problems of human-machine communication. 1987;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Svenonius E. The intellectual foundation of information organization. 2000;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Taniguchi S. An analysis of orientedness in cataloging rules. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(5):1999;448-460.
60. Tweedie, L. (1997). Characterizing interactive externalizations. In CHI'97 (pp. 375-382).
61. Veerasamy, A., & Belkin, N. J. (1996). Evaluation of a tool for visualization of information retrieval results. In SIGIR'96 (pp. 85-92).
62. Wise J.A. The ecological approach to text visualization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50:1999;1224-1233.
63. Wu M., Fuller M., Wilkinson R. Using clustering and classification approaches in interactive retrieval. Information Processing and Management. 37:2001;459-484.
64. Xie H. Shifts of interactive intentions and information-seeking strategies in interactive information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51:2000;841-857.