Effects of mug book size and computerized pruning on the usefulness of dynamic mug book procedures

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 265-277

  McAllister, Hunter A ^a   Stewart, Heather A ^a   Loveland, James ^a  

^a SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized Mug Book; Eyewitness Identification; Mug Book

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043245849     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1068316031000081363     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Davies, G., Shepherd, J. and Ellis, H. (1979). Effects of interpolated mug shot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.
2. Goodman, L. A. (1978). Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
3. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V. and Burton, M. A. (1998). A comparison of two computer-based identification systems with human perceptions of faces. Vision Research, 38, 2277-2288.
4. Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F. and Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.
5. Laughery, K. R.. Fessler, P. K., Lenorovitz, D. R. and Yoblick, D. A. (1974). Time delay and similarity effects in facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L., Nosworthy, G. J., Martin, R. and Martynuck, C. (1994). Using mug shots to find suspects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 121-130.
7. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
8. Levi, A. M., Jungman, N., Ginton, A., Aperman, A. and Noble, G. (1995). Using similarity judgments to conduct a mug shot album search. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 649-661.
9. McAllister, H. A., Bearden, J. N., Kohlmaier, J. R. and Warner, M. D. (1997). Computerized mug books: does adding multimedia help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 688-698.
10. McAllister, H. A., Blair, M. J.. Cerone, L. G. and Laurent, M. J. (2000). Multimedia mug books: how multi should the media be? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 277-291.
11. Penev, P. and Atick, J. (1996). Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 7, 477-500.
12. Phillips, P. J., Moon, H. Rauss, P. J. and Rizvi, S. A. (1997a). The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, 97, 139-143, D7.
13. Phillips, P. J., Wechsler, H., Huang, J. and Rauss, P. J. (1997b). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms. Unpublished manuscript.
14. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neimacience, 3, 71-86.